معاملات بازخورد در صندوق‌های قابل معامله زعفران

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی به زبان انگلیسی

نویسندگان

• مهدی شاعرعطار
• اکبر میرزاپور باباجان

گروه اقتصاد، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران

https://doi.org/10.22067/jead.2023.80030.1171

چکیده

صندوق­های کالایی یکی از انوع صندوق­های قابل معامله در بورس هستند که دارایی پایه آن­ها به جای سهام، محصولات کشاورزی، انرژی و یا فلزات می­باشند. این صندوق­ها به روش­های مختلفی نظیر نگه­داری فیزیکی کالا، قرارداد آتی کالای منفرد، سبدی از قراردادهای آتی کالاها و یا خریداری سهام کالاهای مختلف، سرمایه­گذاران خود را در مقابل بازار انواع کالاها قرار می­دهند. طی سال­های اخیر، این ابزار مالی با ایجاد مزیت­های فراوان به یکی از گزینه­های مهم سرمایه­گذاری در بین معامله­گران تبدیل شده است. با وجود این تحولات، شواهد کمی در ادبیات فعلی در مورد رفتار معاملاتی سرمایه­گذاران این صندوق­ها گزارش شده است. هدف از این مقاله، بررسی وجود معاملات بازخورد در رفتار معامله­گران صندوق­های کالایی زعفران در ایران می­باشد. به این جهت از داده­های روزانه دو صندوق زعفران موجود در بورس کالای ایران یعنی سحرخیز و نویرا، طی دوره زمانی 14/10/1399 الی 30/08/1401 و مدل معاملات بازخورد سنتانا-وادوانی (1992) استفاده شده است. نتایج حاصل نشان داد که نوسان بازدهی صندوق­های زعفران نسبت به اخبار مثبت و منفی متقارن می­باشد. با وجود بازار رسمی با هم­پوشانی کامل برای معاملات دارایی پایه، معامله­گران صندوق­های زعفران توجهی به انحراف قیمت بین صندوق­ها و خالص ارزش دارایی­ آن­ها ندارند. نتایج حاصل از برآورد مدل معاملات بازخورد نشان داد که علائمی از وجود معاملات بازخورد در هیچ کدام از صندوق­های زعفران دیده نمی­شود و معامله­گران این صندوق­ها توجهی به بازدهی گذشته آن ندارند. به نظر می­رسد بازار این صندوق­ها از کارایی برخوردار می­باشد که این موضوع را می­توان با خاص بودن دارایی پایه زعفران و سرمایه­گذاران این صندوق­ها در ارتباط دانست.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• صندوق‌های قابل معامله
• صندوق‌های کالایی زعفران
• معاملات بازخورد

20.1001.1.20084722.1402.37.2.2.8

موضوعات

• بازاریابی و تجارت محصولات کشاورزی

عنوان مقاله [English]

Feedback Trading in Saffron Exchange Traded Funds

نویسندگان [English]

• M. Shaerattar
• A. Mirzapour Babajan

Department of Economics, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran

چکیده [English]

Commodity Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) are one type of ETF that underlying assets are agricultural products, energy or metals instead of stocks. These ETFs expose their investors to the market of various commodities in different ways, such as physical commodity, futures of single commodity, futures of baskets commodities, equities with exposures to commodities in various forms. In recent years, this financial instrument has become one of the important investment options among several people by creating many advantages. Despite these developments, scarce evidence exists in the current literature on the feedback trading of ETF investors. The objective of this paper is examination of feedback trading in behavior investors of Saffron ETF in Iran. For this purpose, daily data of two Saffron ETF for January 3, 2021 - Novenber 11, 2022 and Sentana and Wadhwani (1992) model was used. Empirical analysis suggests that volatility of fund return is symmetrical against the news. Despite a formal market with full overlapping for the underlying assets, Saffron ETFs investors do not notice about the difference between ETFs' market prices and their Net Asset Value (NAV). The results of the feedback trading model show that there is no evidence of feedback trading in Saffron ETF. It seems that the market of Saffron ETF is efficient, which can be related to the specificity of the underlying assets and the investors of these ETFs.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Exchange traded fund
• Feedback trading
• Saffron commodity ETF

مراجع

1. Abner, D. (2016). The ETF handbook. How to value and trade exchange-traded funds (2nd edition). John Wiley & Sons.
2. Antoniou, A., Koutmos, G., & Pericli, A. (2005). Index futures and positive feedback trading: evidence from major stock exchanges. Journal of Empirical Finance, 12(2), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2003.11.003
3. Barberis, N., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). A model of investor sentiment. Journal of Financial Economics, 9(3), 307–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00027-0
4. Charteris, A., Chau, F., Gavriilidis, K., & Kallintrakis, V. (2014). Premiums, discounts and feedback trading: evidence from emerging markets' ETFs. International Review of Financial Analysis, 35, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2014.07.010
5. Charteris, A., & Kallinterakis, V. (2021). Feedback trading in retail-dominated assets: Evidence from the gold bullion coin market, International Review of Financial Analysis, 75, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101727
6. Charteris, A., & Musadziruma, A. (2017), Feedback trading in stock index futures: Evidence from South Africa, Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 1289–1297.
7. Chau, F., Deesomsak, R., & Lau, M. (2011). Investor sentiment and feedback trading: Evidence from the exchange traded funds market. International Review of Financial Analysis, 20, 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2011.06.006
8. Chen, J., & McMillan, D.G. (2020). Stock returns, illiquidity and feedback trading. Review of Accounting and Finance, 19(2), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-02-2017-0024
9. Cherry, J. (2004). The limits of arbitrage: evidence from exchange traded funds. Working Paper, University of California-Berkeley. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.628061
10. Da Costa Neto, A.F., Klotzle, M.C., & Pinto, A.C.F. (2019). Investor behavior in ETF markets: A comparative study between the US and emerging markets. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 14(5), 944–966. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-04-2018-0195
11. De Long, J.B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L.H., & Waldmann, R.J. (1990). Positive feedback investment strategies and destabilizing rational speculation. Journal of Finance, 45(2), 375-379. https://doi.org/10.2307/2328662
12. DeFusco, R., Ivanov, S., & Karels, G. (2011). The exchange traded funds' pricing deviation, Analysis and forecasts. Journal of Economics and Finance, 35, 181– https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-009-9090-6
13. Deville, L. (2008). Exchange Traded Funds: History, Trading, and Research. Handbook of Financial Engineering. 67-97 (Springer).
14. Dorfleitner, G., Gerl, A., & Gerer J. (2016). The pricing efficiency of exchange-traded commodities. Review of Managerial Science, 12, 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11846-016-0221-0
15. Engel, A., & Sarkar, D. (2006). Premiums-discounts and exchange traded funds, Journal of Derivatives, 13(4), 27– https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.2006.635418
16. Farmer, J.D., & Joshi, S. (2002). The price dynamics of common trading strategies. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 49(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00065-3. https://tse.ir https://www.fipiran.com https://www.ime.co.ir https://www.tsetmc.ir
17. International investment funds assosiation (IIFA), (2022). Worldwide regulated open-end fund assets flows second quarter. Available at: https://iifa.ca/page/industry_statistics.
18. Ivanov, S. (2013). The influence of ETFs on the price discovery of gold, silver and oil. Journal of Economics and Finance, 37, 453-462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-011-9205-8.
19. Johnson, WF. (2009). Tracking errors of exchange traded funds. Journal of Asset Management, 10(4), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1057/jam.2009.10
20. Kallinterakis, V., & Kaur, S. (2010). On the impact of exchange-traded funds over noise trading: Evidence from European stock exchanges. In G. N. Gregoriou (Ed.), Handbook of trading (pp. 199–212). Europe: McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2010.08.005
21. Kallinterakis, V., Leite Ferreira, M. (2007). Herding and feedback trading: Evidence on their relationship at the macro level. SSRN Working Paper, 984681. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.984681
22. Kallinterakis, V., Liu, F., Pantelous, A.A., & Shao, J. (2020), Pricing inefficiencies and feedback trading: Evidence from country ETFs, International Review of Financial Analysis, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101498
23. Karaa, R. et al. (2021). Do investors feedback trade in the Bitcoin—and why? European Journal of Finance, (15 Sep), https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2021.1973054
24. Kuttu, S., & Bokpin, G.A. (2017). Feedback trading and autocorrelation patterns in sub-Saharan African Equity markets, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 53(1), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2016.1178111
25. Kyrkilis, D., Koulakiotis, A., Babalos, V., & Kyriakou, M. (2018), Feedback trading and short-term return dynamics in Athens Stock Exchange: Novel evidence and the role of size, International Journal of Managerial Finance, 14(5), 574-590. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-07-2017-0145
26. Mallika, M., & Sulphey, M. (2018). Gold exchange traded fund- price discovery and performance analysis. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 65(4), 477-195. https://doi.org/10.2478/saeb-2018-0024
27. Odean, T. (1998). Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? Journal of finance, 53(5), 1775-1798. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00072
28. Purohit, H., & Malhotra, N. (2015). Pricing efficiency and performance of exchange traded funds in India. The IUP Journal of Applied Finance, 21(3). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2671810
29. Sentana, E., & Wadhwani, S. (1992). Feedback traders and stock return autocorrelations: Evidence from a century of daily data. The Economic Journal, 102(411), 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5606(97)00021-1
30. Shefrin, H., & Statman, M. (1985). The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: Theory and evidence. Journal of Finance, 40(3), 777-790. https://doi.org/10.2307/2327802
31. Wagner, M., Tek Lee, J., & Margaritis, D. (2022). Mutual fund flows and seasonalities in stock returns, Journal of Banking and Finance, 144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106623
32. World Federation of Exchanges (WFE), (2022). Statistics: Monthly Reports. Available at: http://www.world-exchanges.org/home/index.php/statistics/monthly-reports.