کاربرد شبکه بیزین در بررسی تأثیر بهره‌وری کشاورزی و محیط کسب‌وکار بر شاخص تولید غذا (امنیت غذایی) در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• سمیه نقوی ¹
• عباس میرزایی ²

¹ گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه جیرفت، جیرفت، ایران

² گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی و توسعه روستایی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، ملاثانی، ایران

https://doi.org/10.22067/jead2.v34i2.86033

چکیده

امنیت غذایی، یکی از محورهای رشد و توسعه اقتصادی و از اهداف مهم هر کشور محسوب می­شود. با توجه به اهمیت بخش کشاورزی در امنیت غذایی، در این مطالعه، با استفاده از شبکه بیزین به بررسی تأثیر بهره­وری کشاورزی و محیط کسب و کار بر شاخص تولید غذا در ایران در دوره زمانی 1381-1396 پرداخته شد. نتایج نشان داد متغیرهای بهره­وری کشاورزی و محیط کسب و کار تأثیر مثبت بر شاخص تولید غذا دارند. همچنین، نتایج تحلیل حساسیت شبکه بیزین نشان داد بیشترین متغیر تأثیرگذار بر شاخص تولید غذا، متغیر بهره­وری کشاورزی و پس از آن بهره­وری آب در بخش کشاورزی می­باشد. بنابراین، اعمال سیاست هایی به منظور کاهش هزینه تولید، افزایش بهره وری تولیدکنندگان محصولات کشاورزی و تشویق سرمایه گذاری بخش خصوصی در بخش کشاورزی، می­توانند در جهت هدفمندسازی سیاست های حمایتی بخش کشاورزی در راستای امنیت غذایی مؤثر باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• امنیت غذایی
• بهره‌وری آب
• بهره‌وری کشاورزی
• محیط کسب و کار

20.1001.1.20084722.1399.34.2.4.9

عنوان مقاله [English]

Application of Bayesian Network in Investigating the Impact of Agricultural Productivity and Business Environment on Food Production Index in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

• S. Naghavi ¹
• A. Mirzaei ²

¹ Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran

² Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Rural Development, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Food security is one of the main goals of economic growth and development of each country. , in this study, Due to the importance of agricultural sector in food security, the effect of agricultural productivity and Business environment on food production index in Iran was investigated using Bayesian network during 2001-2016. One of the indicators of food security that is based on micro data is the food production index. The food production index includes food products that are considered edible and contain nutrients. But coffee and tea are an exception, because although they are edible, they have no nutritional value. This index is calculated as the ratio of food production value to the value of basic food production. Also, the health and food security of a country is directly dependent on agricultural production. One of the important indicators in the field of improving domestic production and subsequent food security is improving business environment, which its role in increasing production, especially in the agricultural sector, has been ignored. Improving the business environment is a key step in developing private sector investment, product and employment in the country. Although many studies have attempted to investigate effective factors on food security, but impact of the agricultural productivity index and business environment has not been considered. The institutional environment in which all economic businesses are formed, or have gone bankrupt and exit is called the business environment of economic activities. Improving the business environment by increasing entrepreneurship, increasing investment, reducing the informal sector, reducing production costs and prices of domestic goods, strengthening property rights, reducing corruption and reducing smuggling will increase economic growth. In this study, the effect of two factors of agricultural sector productivity and business environment on food security as factors affecting domestic production has been investigated. Various studies have proven the establishment of food security through supportive policies in the agricultural sector and increasing production in this sector. None of the studies, in particular, examined the effect of agricultural productivity on food security.
Materials and Method: In this study, the effect of agricultural productivity and Business environment on food production index in Iran is investigated using Bayesian network during 2001-2016. The Bayesian network is a probabilistic graph pattern that shows a set of variables and probabilities associated with each. This network is a straightforward, cyclical graph in which nodes are problem variables. The structure of a Bayesian network is, in fact, a graph of the interaction of the variables to be modeled. In addition to showing the quality of the relationship between the problem variables, it also shows the quantity of the relationship between these variables. Each network consists of three components: 1) nodes 2) the relationship between nodes and 3) the conditional probability table of nodes. The variables in the graph and the links show the relationships between the variables. The conditional probability table is also used to define the conditional probability of causal relationships.
Results and Discussion: The results showed that the increase in the real exchange rate, agricultural productivity, water productivity in the agricultural sector, and the improvement of the business environment have led to an increase in the food production index in Iran. The business environment is very important in the prosperity of production because an unfavorable business environment would increase production costs and reduce the competitiveness of goods in the international arena. Inadequate business environment has a significant impact on reducing economic growth and, consequently, the growth of the agricultural sector. Agriculture is considered as an area or platform for business. Therefore the development of agricultural businesses is also a manifestation of entrepreneurial behavior in this sector. Improving the business environment is a key step in the development of private sector investment, production and employment in the country. By providing the right conditions for competitiveness and effective entry of the private sector, a decisive role in it plays the economic growth and development of the country. Therefore, simplifying the licensing process; Reducing administrative procedures and time to enforce customs tariffs and simplifying rules and regulations are effective in improving the business environment.
 The health and food security of a country is directly dependent on the production of the agricultural sector. The results showed that the share of value added of the agricultural sector in GDP and grain production, as indicators of agricultural productivity, has a positive effect on food security. The agricultural sector has an important role to play in achieving a prosperous production and food security. Therefore, the need to pay attention to the agricultural sector and appropriate support for this sector is felt. Increasing the level of productivity can improve economic growth, optimal use of resources, cost reduction, profitability and production capacity. For this purpose, it is necessary to review the necessary parameters in the design of irrigation systems and to develop design instructions according to the crisis water and soil conditions of the country.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Agricultural productivity
• Business environment
• Food security
• Water productivity

مراجع

1. Abdullah Zhou D., Shah T., Ali S., Ahmad W., Ud Din I., and Ilyas A. 2017. Factors affecting household food security in rural northern hinterland of Pakistan. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences 18: 201-210.
2. Akhoni Pourhosseini F., and Asadi E. 2017. Bayesian networks, Gamma Test, Groundwater level, model Least Squares Support Vector Machine, Plain Ardebil. Jwmseir 11(36): 33-42. (In Persian)
3. Bagerzadeh Azar, F., Ranjpour, R. and Takanloo, Z. (2017). A New Assessment of the Security Using Global Food Safety initiative (GFSI) Index. Health System Research 2: 236-243. (In Persian)
4. Brüssow K., Fabe A., and Grote U. 2017. Implications of climate-smart strategy adoption by farm households for food security in Tanzania. Food Security 9(6): 1203–1218.
5. Cain J.D., Jinapala K., Makin I.W., Somaratna P.G., Ariyaratnab B.R., and Perera L.R. 2003. Participatory decision support for agricultural management. A case study from Sri Lanka", Sri Lanka, Agricultural Systems.
6. Capalbo S.M., and Vo T.T. 2015. A review of the evidence on agricultural productivity. Agricultural productivity: Measurement and explanation 96.
7. Conceição P., Levine S., Lipton M., and Warren-Rodríguez A. 2016. Toward a food secure future: Ensuring food security for sustainable human development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Food Policy 60: 1-9.
8. Davies P. 2007. Bayesian Decision Networks for Management of High Conservation. Report to the Conservation of Freshwater Ecosystem Values Project. Department of Primary Industries and Water, Hobart, Tasmania.
9. Department of Compilation and Regulation of Laws. 2004. Law of the Fourth Economic, Social and Cultural Development Plan of the Islamic Republic of Department of Compilation and Regulation of Laws. 2005. Law of the Fifth Economic, Social and Cultural Development Plan of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran.
10. Devereux S. 2007. The impact of droughts and floods on food security and policy options to alleviate negative effects. Agricultural Economics 37: 47–58.
11. Food and Agricultural Organization of United Nation (FAO). 2008. An Introduction to the Basic Concepts of Food Security. Rome, Italy.
12. Farajzadeh Z., Zhu X., and Bakhshoodeh M. 2017. Trade reform in Iran for accession to the World Trade Organization: Analysis of welfare and environmental impacts. Economic Modelling 63: 75–85. (In Persian)
13. Frelat R., Lopez-Ridaura S., Giller K.E., Herrero M., Douxchamp S., Djurfeldt A.A., Erenstein O., Henderson B., Kassie M., Paul B.K., and Rigolot C. 2016. Drivers of household food availability in sub-Saharan Africa based on big data from small farms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(2): 458-463.
14. Hayes M. J., Svoboda M. D., Wilhite D. A., and Vanyarkho, O. V. 1999. Monitoring the drought using the standardized precipitation index. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc 80: 429–438.
15. Headey D., and Fankhauser. 2010. Reflections on the global food crisis. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Available at: www.ifpri.org.
16. Helfand S.M., Magalhães M.M., and Rada, N.E. 2015. Brazil's agricultural total factor productivity growth by farm size (No. IDB-WP-609). IDB Working Paper Series.
17. Hosseini S. S., Pakravan M. R., Gilanpour O., and Atghayi M. 2012. Investigating the Effects of Protection Policy on Agriculture Sector TFP. Journal of Economics and Agricultural Development 25(4): 507-516. (In Persian)
18. Hosseini S.M., and Fahimifar F. 2011. The role of financial system development and improvement of business doing on economic growth. The Fourth Conference on Financial System Development in Iran. (In Persian)
19. Hubbard L., and Hubbard C.2013. Food security in the United Kingdom: External supply risks. Food Policy 43(5): 142-147.
20. Karimi M., and Jolaini, M. 2016. Evaluation of Agricultural Water Productivity Indices in Major Field Crops in Mashhad Plain (Technical Note). Journal of Water and Sustainable Development 4(1): 133-138.
21. Khanzadi A., Sharif Karimi M., and Shokri N. 2017. Evaluation of Food Security with an Emphasis on FSI Indicator in Kermanshah Province. Agricultural Economics & Development 32(1): 82-69.
22. Khiz Z., Zibaei M., and Farajzadeh Z. 2018. Impact of drought on households’ income and welfare and food production index. Agricultural Economics 2: 21-43.
23. Kuikka S., and Varis O. 1997. Uncertainties of climate change impacts in Finnish watersheds: A Bayesian network analysis of expert knowledge, Boreal Environment Research.
24. Lolemtum J.T., Mugalavai E.M., and Obiri J.A. 2017. Impact of Drought on Food Security in West Pokot County, Kenya. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 7(6): 742-750
25. Mckee T.B., Doesken N.J., Kleist J. 1993. The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. 8 Conf, Applied climatology, 17-22 January, California: 1-6.
26. Mehrabi Boshrabadi H and Owhadi A. 2014. Investigation of Effective Factors on Food Security in Iran. Agricultural Economics 8: 111-121. (In Persian)
27. Mirzaei A., and Sabaeh 2011. Specialized water engineering software, Kiyan Green Computer Publications, First Edition.
28. Ndlovu P.V., Mazvimavi K., An H., and Murendo C. 2014. Productivity and efficiency analysis of maize under conservation agriculture in Zimbabwe. Agricultural Systems 124: 21-31.
29. Ogunlesi A., Bokana K., Okoye C., and Loy J.P. 2018.Agricultural Productivity and Food Supply Stability in Sub-Saharan Africa: LSDV and SYS-GMM Approach. MPRA Paper 90204: 1-29.
30. Sartori M., and Schiavo, S. 2015. Connected we stand: A network perspective on trade and global food security. Food Policy 57: 114–127.
31. Serres A., Kobayakawa Sh., Sløk T., and Vartia L. 2006. Regulation of Financial Systems and Economic Growth in OECD Countries: An Empirical Analysis. OECD Economic Studies 43.
32. Seyed Safdar H., Pakravan M.R., and Etghaei M. 2014. Effects of Agricultural Sector Total Support Estimate on Food Security in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development.
33. Shahnazi R., and Dehghan Shabani Z. 2011.Investigating the Effect Bussiness Environmet on Economic Growth in /the Selected Counties.Journal of Economic Research 42(3): 161-185.
34. Tinta A.A., Sarpong D.B., Ouedrgo I.M., Hassan R.A., Bonsu A.M., Onumah E.E. 2018. The effect of integration, global value chains and international trade on economic growth and food security in ECOWAS. Food Science and Technolgy 4: 1-15.
35. Twongyirwe R., Mfitumukiza D., Barasa B., Naggayi B., Hannington O., Nyakato V., and Mutoni G. 2019. Perceived effects of drought on household food security in South-western Uganda: Coping responses and determinants. Weather and Climate Etremes 24: 1-11.
36. Zerarat Kish S.Y., and Kamali ZH. 2017. Factors Affecting Food Security of Rural Farming Households in Kohkiluyeh and Boyer- Ahmad Provience of Iran. Journal of Food. JOURNAL OF FOOD TECHNOLOGY AND NUTRITION 2(54): 77-86.
37. Zhai K, 2013. Vision of Resource, Structure, System and Chinese Food Security. IERI Procedia. 4: 408-416.