آثار افزایش قیمت کالاهای خوراکی بر رفاه و فقر خانوارهای شهری ایران

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه شیراز

2 دانشگاه کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری

چکیده

هدف اصلی این پژوهش بررسی تأثیر افزایش قیمت کالاهای خوراکی بر رفاه خانوارهای شهری است. به‌منظور بررسی رفتار مصرف‌کنندگان و برآورد کشش­های قیمتی کالاهای مورد مطالعه از رهیافت دیتون استفاده شده است. براساس این رهیافت واکنش مصرف‌کنندگان نسبت به افزایش قیمت کالاهای خوراکی مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. بدین منظور از اطلاعات مربوط به هزینه و درآمد خانوارهای شهری مرکز آمار ایران در سال 1393 استفاده شده است. داده‌های این بررسی نیز شامل مخارج و مقادیر مصرف کالاهای خوراکی و همچنین ویژگی­های جمعیتی اندازه خانوار و میزان تحصیلات سرپرست خانوار است. پس از تخمین تابع تقاضای کالاهای خوراکی خانوار با استفاده از سیستم تقاضای تقریبا ایده­آل درجه دوم (QAIDS)، کشش قیمتی و درآمدی محاسبه شده است. بر اساس نتایج به دست آمده، در نتیجه­ی اعمال سه سناریوی افزایش قیمت، با 15 درصد افزایش قیمت‌ها، 144 خانوار (98/1 درصد) به خانواده های فقیر و زیر خط فقر اضافه شده­اند. با افزایش 25 درصدی قیمت­ها، 253 خانوار (5/3 درصد) و با افزایش 50 درصدی قیمت­ها 503 خانوار (93/6 درصد) به زیر خط فقر منتقل شدند. بنابراین با توجه به اینکه خوراکی­ها، سهم بالایی از سبد مصرفی خانوارهای شهری را به خود اختصاص داده است، می‌بایستی جهت حفظ سطح رفاه خانوارها، حمایت‌های مالی لازم انجام شده و معادل تغییرات جبرانی محاسبه شده جهت حفظ مطلوبیت خانوارها، پرداخت گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effects of Increasing Food Commodities Prices on the Welfare and Poverty of Iranian Urban Households

نویسندگان [English]

  • niloofar ashktorab 1
  • Zahra Nematollahi 2
1 shiraz university
2 Sari University of agriculture and natural resources
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Measuring changes in economic welfare has been known as one of the practical economic issues. So, this study aimed to calculate the welfare changes resulted from the changes in Iran food prices. To accomplish such task, welfare macroeconomic theory, compensating variation (CV) criteria, household income and expenditure data of Iran in 2014 were used. The purpose of this study is to provide scientific solutions to assess consumer behavior and estimate the price elasticity of goods.
Materials and Methods: Compensating variation represents the net income that must be given to household in order to restore them to the utility level they have been before the price changes. The price change is negative after an increase because it is expressed as a central authority’s expenditure to restore the household to the pre-price change utility level. In order to estimate compensated variation, at first household's demand system should be estimated. So, the parameters of the demand system are estimated by applying nonlinear seemingly unrelated regression to the system of eight share equations. Parameter estimates, summarized in form of income and price elasticities, provide more clear understanding of household food consumption behavior in 2014 and also these parameter estimates provide a theoretically consistent model of household food demand that can be used to evaluate the welfare impressions of food price increases.
Results and Discussion: Uncompensated own price elasticities are calculated. Due to the absolute value of the coefficients of elasticity, it can be stated that for urban households the demand for all selected goods, other than oil and fat, is not elastic to price changes. Investigation of the non-compensatory cross-sectional for cereals indicates the existence of a complementary relationship between cereals and most foods. Meanwhile, the most and the least complete complementary relationship is between cereals- meat and cereals - sugar. In other words, urban households after the inclusion of cereals in their basket regard this food as a supplement to their food basket. Investigating cross-sectional elasticity of meat in urban households revealed a substitution relationship between meat, dairy, oil and fat, fruits, vegetables and sugar. According to the absolute value of cross-sectional, it can be stated that there is a weak substitution relationship between the desired foods. The positive sign of cross-sectional elasticity implies an increase in meat consumption in urban households as a result of rising food prices. Also, the relationship between meat and cereals with respect to the negative elasticity is a Complementary relationship. Therefore, a one- percent increases in the price of cereals, assuming that the other requirements for meat demand are fixed, leads 0.023% to –percent decrease in meat demand. Based on the results of Table 2, non-compensatory cross-sectional of dairy products indicates the existence of complementary relationship between dairy products and cereals. Other cross-sectional elasticities for dairy products are positive and indicate the substitution relationship of dairy products with other foods, including meat. The highest ratio of substitution to dairy is tea and coffee with cross-sectional elasticity equals 0.415%. Therefore, urban households, after adding dairy products in their basket, add tea and coffee as a substitute for dairy products to their food basket. An examination of cross-sectional elasticity for oil and fat indicates the existence of a complementary relationship between oil and fat with fruits, tea and coffee. In other words, urban households after adding fat and oil in their basket will add fruits, tea and coffee as a complement to their basket, which means increasing the consumption of fruits, tea and coffee along with fat and oil consumption for urban households.
Results of current study indicate of high income elasticity for cereals due to the variety of goods as well as existence of numerous types of cultivars processed in this kind of foods. So this kind can be considered as luxury especially for the types of processed products. The elasticities of other foods are positive and smaller than one. So these foods are considered as essential commodities for urban households.
In the next section, three scenarios including 15, 25 and 50 percent increase in food prices are considered and the impacts of changes in food prices on urban household expenditures are calculated by means of the welfare index of compensatory changes for the eight main food groups. Results reveal that for urban households the average consumption of meat is higher than other food stuffs. After meat, the highest consumption expenditure is allocated to cereals with the average consumption expenditures calculated for urban households s 892,000 Rials. In other words, these two groups of foods including cereals and meat are among the main commodities in the household food basket.
Conclusion: Considering the importance and share of food commodities in the consumption basket of households, this study examines the effect of rising prices of edible chips on welfare and consequently on poverty of urban households. In this regard, the quadratic ideal demand system has been applied to estimate the demand for household food commodities and the criterion of compensating variation has been used as the welfare measure The results show that, given the absolute value of the coefficients of own elasticity, it can be stated that for these households demand for all selected goods other than oil and fat is inelastic in response to price changes. Therefore supposed that foodstuffs have a high share of the households basket, it is necessary to provide financial support to maintain the welfare of households and pay equivalent compensatory changes calculated to retain the desirability of households.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • price increasing
  • essential goods
  • Poverty
  • QAIDS demand function
1- Ahmed M.A., and Buoys H.E. 2002. Weighing what's practical: proxy means Tests for Targeting Food Subsidies in Egypt, FC ND Discussion paper, 132, http//www.ifpri.org.
2- Akbari A., Ahmadi Javid M., Ziaei M.B., and Barekati S.M. 2015. Estimation of food demand function of urban households in Sistan and Baluchistan province using NNDS and QUAIDS systems. Agricultural Economics Research, 9(2): 93- 116. (In Persian)
3- Attanasio O., Di Maro V., Lechene V., and Phillips D. 2013. Welfare consequences of food prices increases: Evidence from rural Mexico. Journal of Development Economics, 104: 136–151.
4- Azzam A.M., and Rettab B. 2012. A welfare measure of consumer vulnerability to rising prices of food imports in the UAE; Food Policy, 37: 554-560.
5- Daat G. 1998. Controversy, tools for porerty measurement and Analysis FCND Discussion paper, No, 50. http://www.ifpri.org.
6- Deaton A., and Muellbauer J. 1980. An almost ideal demand system. American Economic Review, 70: 312–326.
7- Deaton A. 2000. Analysis of Household Surveys: A Micro Econometric Approach to Development Policy. John Hopkins University Press. Tech. rep., World Bank policy research working paper.
8- Ebrahimi M., and Dehghani Ahmadabadi H. 2011. Study of welfare changes due to increased electricity prices in urban and rural households. Journal of Social Welfare Research, 12(46): 373-397. (In Persian)
9- Falahi F., Mohammadzadeh P., and Hekmati Farid S. 2013. Study of welfare effects of commodity price rises in rural households in the country. Journal of Economic Research, 2: 131-150. (In Persian)
10- Fujii T. 2013. Impact of food inflation on poverty in the Philippines; Food Policy, 39: 13-27.
11- Ghahraman Zadeh M., Ziaee M.B., Pishbahr A., and Dashti GH. 2015. Measuring the effect of rising food prices on the welfare of Iranian urban households. Agricultural Economics Journal, 9(4): 97-119. (In Persian)
12- Gorman W.M. 1953. Community preference fields. Econometrica, 21: 63–80.
Haraki K. 1998. Food Subsidies: A case study of price Reform in morocco, h sms working paper, 50.
Hosseini Yekani S.A., Nematollahi Z., and Hosseinzadeh M. 2017. The welfare effects of rising of domestic rice Price on Mazandaranians households, Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 31(3): 228- 239. (In Persian)
13- Hosseinzad J., Sohrabi Athar F., Dashti Gh., and Ghahramanzadeh M. 2014. Application of system models in the analysis of demand for food commodities in Iran, Iranian Economic Research and Development, 45(3): 545- 554. (In Persian)
14- Layani Gh., and Esmaeili A. 2015. Determine the vulnerability of urban households due to the increase in imported food prices in Iran. Agricultural Economics Research, 7(3): 109-127. (In Persian)
15- Layani Gh., and Bakhshoudeh M. 2016. Investigating changes in the level of poverty and determining the vulnerability of rural households due to the rise in global prices of food in Iran, Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, 16(3): 1- 27. (In Persian)
16- Loughrey J., and Odonoghue C. 2012. The Welfare impact of price changes on household Welfare and inequality 1999-2011, the Economic and Social Review, 43(1): 31–66.
17- Minot N., and Dewina R. 2013. Impact of food price changes on household welfare in Ghana, ifpri discussion paper 01245, 1- 32.
18- Mosakhani GH. 1999. Analysis of Social Welfare in Iran and its Effectiveness from Inequality of Income. Thesis, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
19- Muellbauer J. 1976. Community preferences and the representative consumer. Econometrica, 44: 979–999.
20- Nelson C., Wood B., and Nogueira L. 2011. Econometrics of welfare evaluation of price changes: The case of food price increases in Mexico.
21- Nematalahi Z., and Shahnoushi Foroshani N. 2012. Evaluating the effects of energy efficiency allocation on the Prices of Agricultural Products, Food Industries and Household Welfare (Application of Input-Output Table). Eighth Biennial of Iranian Agricultural Economics, 2623-2634. (In Persian)
22- Osei-Asare Y.B., and Eghan M. 2013. Food price inflation and consumer Welfare in Ghana. International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics, 1(1): 27-39.
23- Piraee Kh., and Akbari Moghadam B. 2005. Effect of reduction of agricultural subsidy and changes in labor tax rate on urban production and welfare of rural and urban households in Iran (based on the generalized computational equation and social accounting matrix simulation method). Quarterly journal of economic research of Iran, 7(22): 1-30.) In Persian (
24- Piraee Kh.N and Shahsavari M.R. 2009. Poverty assessment in urban and rural areas of Fars province. Economic Research, 9(9): 233-265. (In Persian)
25- Renani M., and Mehabadi M. 2000. Impact of inequality and poverty on the efficiency of macroeconomic policies. Articles on poverty in Iran, University of Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences Tehran: 189-209.) In Persian (
26- Rodriguez-Takeuchi L., and Imai K.S. 2013. Food price surges and poverty in urban Colombia: New evidence from household survey data; Food Policy, 43: 227-236.
27- Sen A.K. 1976. Poverty: an ordinal approach to the measurement; Econometrica, 44: 219-231.
28- Shimeles A., and Delelegn A. 2013. Rising Food Prices and Household Welfare in Ethiopia: Evidence from Micro Data, Working Paper Series, 182.
29- Varian H. 1999. Microeconomic theory. Translation: Abbas Shakeri, Tehran, Ney Publishing. (In Persian (
30- Vu L., and Glewwe P. 2011. Impacts of rising food prices on poverty and welfare in Vietnam. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 14-27.
31- Ziegelhofer Z. 2014. Food prices and household welfare: A pseudo panel approach, Ph.D thesis of International Economics at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies.