طراحی مدل اقتصادی توسعه فرآیند کنترل و گواهی بذر گندم با رویکرد تلفیقی تئوری بنیادی و تحلیل شبکه‏ ای

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• معصومه بهادری ¹
• بیتا رحیمی بدر ¹
• علیرضا نیکوئی ²
• رویا اشراقی سامانی ¹

¹ گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج، ایران

² بخش تحقیقات اقتصادی، اجتماعی و ترویج کشاورزی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان اصفهان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، اصفهان، ایران

10.22067/jead.2025.90404.1306

چکیده

سیستم کنترل و گواهی بذر به‌عنوان ابزاری کلیدی جهت تأیید کیفیت بذور تولیدی شناخته شده است. با توجه به جایگاه منحصر به فرد گندم در نظام زراعی و مصرفی، این فرآیند نقش ویژه‌ای در پایداری تولید بذر سالم و امنیت غذایی در کشور ایفا می‏نماید. مطالعه حاضر به‌دلیل فقدان غنای تئوریکی و با هدف طراحی مدل مفهومی عوامل مؤثر بر توسعه نظام کنترل بذر و شناسایی مهم ترین مؤلفه‌های اثر‌گذار با توجه به معیارهای فنی، اقتصادی، اجتماعی و ساختاری انجام گرفت. جهت دستیابی به اهداف پژوهش از تئوری مفهوم‌سازی بنیادی و تحلیل شبکه‌ای استفاده گردید. اطلاعات مورد نیاز از طریق 30 مصاحبه هدفمند با خبرگان بخش کشاورزی در حوزه بذر غلات گردآوری شد. 47 مفهوم، 11 مقوله محوری و چهار مقوله گسترده در قالب ابعاد شش گانه مدل پارادایمی شناسایی شدند. در ادامه هشت نفر از اعضای هیأت علمی متخصص در زمینه کنترل بذر برای انجام مقایسات زوجی انتخاب گردید. روایی و پایایی پژوهش در سطح مطلوب ارزیابی شد. در تفسیر معنایی مدل مفهومی، عوامل نظارتی و سیاست‏های حمایتی دولت در جایگاه راهکارها با پیامدهای، بهبود کیفیت بذر و ثبات بازار بذر شناسایی گردید. نتایج نشان داد، کیفیت هسته‏های بذری و متعادل‌سازی قیمت فروش بذر سالم نسبت به سایر مؤلفه‏های معیار فنی و اقتصادی دارای اهمیت بیشتری بودند. افزون بر این، رتبه‌بندی شرکت‌های تولید‌کننده بذر جهت ارائه تسهیلات تشویقی به واحدهای برتر و حمایت از ورود شرکت‏های دانش بنیان به عرصه تولید بذر از جمله راهبردهایی بودند که برای توسعه این فرآیند پیشنهاد شد و می‌تواند مورد توجه مسئولان قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• بخش کشاورزی
• تحلیل شبکه ای
• تئوری مفهوم‌سازی بنیادی
• گواهی بذر
• گندم

موضوعات

• اقتصاد کشاورزی

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing an Economic Model for the Development of the Wheat Seed Control and Certification Process with Using the Grounded Theory and Network Analysis Process

نویسندگان [English]

• M. Bahadori ¹
• B. Rahimi Badr ¹
• A. Nikouei ²
• R. Eshraghi Samani ¹

¹ Department of Agricultural Economics, Ka.C., Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

² Economic, Social and Extension Research Department, Isfahan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Isfahan, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction
 The seed industry is a growing industry in the world, and the role of processed seeds in increasing the production performance is undeniable. Due to the population growth, the importance of achieving food security is increasing. Healthy seed is one of the important factors in the development of agricultural production. Although agricultural production systems have increased their production, it does not seem to be enough, though. The basic problems of the seed market and insufficient supply of seeds required by farmers have made it necessary to identify samples of seed quality development. The current research was the first research at the national level dealing with the design of a conceptual model for the development of control and certification of wheat seeds using the grounded theory method and prioritization of effective factors.
 
Materials and Methods
This research had a fundamental-applicative goal and was applied in at two stages. In At the first stage, after designing the interview questions, the grounded theory was carried out in three stages of open, central, and selective coding using a systematic approach in order to design a conceptual model. After designing the paradigm model and identifying the factors affecting the development of seed control and certification, the prioritization of the components was done including technical, social, economic and structural criteria using analytic network process.
 
Results and Discussion
After analyzing the interviews, 140 initial codes were identified and the initial codes were reduced to 94 and then to 47 concepts. In the following parts, 11 core categories including processed seed production standards, laws and regulations, environmental factors, regulatory factors, equipment and technology, stability in the seed market, government support policies, human factors, wheat seed quality, attitude and awareness, and economic infrastructure were identified. The results of prioritization among the four effective criteria on the development of seed certification indicated that the technical criterion was more important than the other three criteria. In terms of the prioritization of the components, the quality of the seed kernel having a weight of 0.49, the performance of the responsible expert having a weight of 0.44, the cost of producing processed seeds having a weight of 0.39 were the first priority of technical, social, and economic criteria. Applying the ranking of production units with a weight of 0.57 and making the seed market competitive with a weight of 0.26 were more important than other components of structural criteria.
 
Conclusion
According to the results of this study, and the first priority of the technical criterion, it is suggested to monitor the quality of seed kernels and select appropriate farm inspectors. Moreover, in order to strengthen the human resources system, it is recommended to hold continuous courses in the field of seed quality. To implement the solutions of the paradigm model, it is recommended to prevent buying and selling unhealthy seeds and balance the costs of producing and selling processed seeds.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Agricultural sector
• Analysis of network processing
• Grounded theory
• Seed control
• Wheat

©2025 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

مراجع

1. Alinejad, Z., Najafi, S.B., Fath Elahi, J., & Zali, N. (2020). Designing a model of realization of knowledge-based agriculture with a grounded theory approach in Kermanshah province. Agricultural Economics (Economics and Agriculture), 15(3). https://doi.org/10.22034/iaes.2021.538475.1862
2. Alivand, R., Nouri, O., Visi, H., & Dehim Fard, R. (2022). Analysis and comparison of community garden indicators using network analysis process. Environmental Sciences Quarterly, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.48308/envs.2023.1225
3. Amerian, A.R., Chirani, E., Gholizadeh, M., & Mirbargkar, S.M. (2021). Financial crimes; Model design and explanation with grounded theory method. Journal of Investment Knowledge, 10(38), 265-285.
4. Arabkhani, A., Seyed Mirzaei, S.M., & Kaldi, A. (2018). Developing a conceptual model of rural women's empowerment using data-based theory. Scientific Quarterly Journal of Cultural and Social Studies of Khorasan Province, https://doi.org/10.22034/fakh.2019.197529.1351
5. (2018). Food Safety Report. http://awnrc.com/images/pdf/reports/foodsecurityabstract.pdf.
6. Azkia, M., Imani, M., & Farzizadeh, Z. (2012). Applied Research Method, Application of Basic Theory (Vol. 2). Kayhan Publications.
7. Bayat Babalghani, M., Faqihi, A., & Daneshfard, K. (2016). Explaining the pattern of institutionalization of trust in Iran's government organizations. Quarterly Journal of Iranian Society of Management Sciences, 15(59), 1-32.
8. Charmaz, K. (2020). Grounded Theory: Main Characteristics. Qualitative Analysis Eight Approaches for the Social Sciences.
9. Chin, K.S, Chan, B.L, & Lam, P.K. (2008). Identifying amd priortizing critical success factors for competition stategy. Industerial Management and Data System, 108(4).
10. Darvishi, B. (2018). New methods of bean seed certification. Journal of Registration and Seed and Seedling Certification.
11. Dee, L.E., Allesina, S., Bonn, A., Eklöf, A., Gaines, S.D., Hines, J., Jacob, U., McDonald-Madden, E., Possingham, H., & Schröter, M. (2017). Operationalizing network theory for ecosystem service assessments. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 32(2), 118-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.011
12. Dehghanshoar, M. (2007). Health and Quarantine Seeds. Seed and Seedling Registration and Certification Research Institute.
13. Dehshiri, A., Zare, L., & Shayanfar, A. (2016). Review article: Seed technology and its role in reducing water consumption. Iran Seed Science and Research, 4(2), 123-133. https://doi.org/10.22124/jms.2017.2502
14. Guneri, A.F., & Cengiz, M.S. (2009). A Fuzzy ANP approach to shipyard location selection, Department of industrial Engineering yildiz Technical University, Yildiz. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.059
15. Habibi Nodeh, F., Ghorbani, M., Kohansal, M., & Abiyar, N.M. (2019). The model of the influence of inputs on the risk of irrigated and rainfed wheat production in the east of Golestan province. Agricultural Economics and Development, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.30490/aead.2020.121575
16. Hamidi, A., & Ramaei, M. (2012). The challenges facing the control and certification of rice seed production in the country The 11th National Rice Conference of the country, Sari.
17. Hasheminejad, A., Abdshahi, A., Ghanian, M., & Khosravipour, B. (2018). Analysis of factors affecting the risk of wheat production in Iran. Agricultural Economics and Development (Agricultural Sciences and Industries), 33(4), 329-338. https://sid.ir/paper/358556/fa.
18. Hemati, B., Forozani, M., Yazdan Panah, M., & Khosravipour, B. (2015). Comparison of the application of the analysis network process (ANP) and the analysis hierarchy process (AHP) in the analysis of the agricultural water poverty index, the study of Dezful city. Science of Agricultural Promotion and Education, 40(2).
19. Heydari, H., & Razeghi, S. (2018). Investigating the obstacles to the growth of economic development indicators of West Azerbaijan province from the point of view of industry activists in the private and public sectors with an emphasis on the grounded theory method. Two Quarterly Journals Of Economic Sociology And Development, 2.
20. Hossein Abadi, H., Mohammadinejad, A., Gilanpour, O., & Khalidi, M. (2021). Socio-economic factors affecting the success of contract farming in Iran. Extension Research and Agricultural Education, 15(2).
21. Ilkaei, M., Sarmirad, A., Abaszadeh, B., & Salehi, E. (2020). The role of feeding the mother plant with chemical and biological fertilizers on the germination characteristics of cluster oregano seeds. Seed Research, 54.
22. Izadpanah, N., Mohammadi, V., & Aghayarmakoui, N. (2017). A review on bread waste (the need to reduce bread waste to increase productivity) the 11th International Conference on Accounting and Management and the 8th Conference on Entrepreneurship and Open Innovations, Tehran.
23. Khaksar, K. (2013). Systems, policies and seed production, control and certification rograms in Iran the second national seed science and technology conference, Mashhad.
24. Khalki, A., Ghorbani, M., Ordvan Esmaali, A., Shekohian, A., & Ali Ashraf, J. (2019). Locating wetlands prone to regeneration in Ardabil tea watershed using AHP hierarchical analysis method. Marte magazine, 1.
25. Kurttila, M., Pesonen, M., Kangas, J., & Kajanus, M. (2000). Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. Forest Policy and Economics, 1(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1389-9341(99)00004-0
26. Maboudi, M., Pourmohammadi, M., Sadr Mousavi, M., & Raushi, S. (2019). Analysis of sustainable urban transportation paradigm change policies, research sample: Tabriz metropolis. Spatial Planning, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.22108/sppl.2020.117018
27. Mirzaei Heydari, M., & Bagheri, M. (2022). Review article on seed production, self-sufficiency and agricultural independence, Journal of Seed Research, 12(43), https://civilica.com/doc/1765230
28. Moghadam, A., Kamalian, A., Orei, Y., Badruddin Kurd, B., & Roshan, S.A. (2016). Explanation and design of entrepreneurial human resources management, Foundation's data approach. Scientific Research Journal of Management Improvement, 4.
29. Mohammadi Azar, S., & Davoudpour, Z. (2018). Branding for the realization of a creative city, presentation of foundation data theory and case study of Erormia city. Local Development, 11.
30. OECD/FAO. (2018). OECD‑ FAO Agricultural Outlook 2018‑ OECD/FAO Report 51. https://doi.org/10.1787/agr_outlook-2018-en
31. Pajohan, A., Omani, A., & Salmanzadeh, S. (2016). Analysis of barriers to the participation of wheat farmers in the field of forming the water catchment organization, Dez irrigation network. Rural Development Strategies, 3(3), 365-378. https://doi.org/310.22048/rdsj.22017.22401.21289
32. Paluoj, M. (2017). Pathology of the exploitation system of agriculture and industry and providing solutions for its development. Agricultural Extension and Education Sciences of Iran, 14(2), 201-217.
33. Pretty, J., Sutherland, W.J., Ashby, J., Auburn, J., Baulcombe, D., Bell, M., Bentley, J., Bickersteth, S., Brown, K., Burke, J., & Campbell, H. (2010). The top 100 questions of importance to the future of global agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 8(4), 219-236, https://doi.org/210.3763/ijas. 2010.0534
34. Saad Elahi, P., Rusta, K., Yagoubi Farani, A., & Baradaran, R. (2020). Explaining the economic, social and political structure of rural poverty with a foundational theory approach (case study: Shamshir village of Paveh County). Agricultural Extension and Education Researches, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/pop4.296
35. Saaty, T.L. (2005). Theory and Aplication of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Benefits, opportunities, Costs and Risks. RWS Publications.
36. Seif Elahi Anar, N., & Mohammad Khani, R. (2020). Designing a conceptual model of the effective factors in the development of agricultural products export, presenting the foundation data theory. International Business Management, 4(2). https://org/10.22034/jiba.2021.45321.1671
37. Shaban Ali Fami, H., Savari, M., Motaghed, M., Mohammadzadeh Nasrabadi, M., Afshari, S., & Baghaee, M. (2020). Formulating and analysis of adaptation strategies of farmers to drought conditions in Isfahan province using TOWS matrix. MJSP, 24(1), 21-47. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4062494
38. Straus, A., & Corbin, J. (2017). Basic of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for developing Grounded Theory (3 ed.). Stage Publication.
39. Ghahremanzadeh, M., Faraji, S., & Pishbahar, E. (2022). Transfer of world prices and exchange rates to domestic prices of major imports of livestock and poultry in the country.Journal of Agricultural Economics, 14(2), 23-52. https://doi.org/10.22034/IAES.2020.134731.1780
40. Uerback, C.F., & Silverstein, L.B. (2017). Qualitative research: An introduction to Coding and analysis. New York University Press.
41. (2018). The State of World Population 2018. United Nation Population Fund.
42. Veisi, M., & Soleimani, N. (2014). Prioritizing the use of media in the awareness of insurance industry brands among consumers. Sociological Studies, 8(27).
43. Yari, L., Mariya, F., & Dalvand, B. (2022). Evaluation of the quality of wheat seed production fields in terms of contamination with illegal weeds, other cultivars and other products in Tehran and Alborz provinces. Plant Production and Genetics, 3(1). https://org/10.34785/J020.2022.539
44. Zareian, A., Hasani, F., Sadeghi, H., & JazaYeri, M. (2015). The process of wheat seed control and certification and its seed production situation in Iran the second national seed science and technology conference.
45. Zheng, S., Yin, K., & Yu, L. (2022). Factors influencing the farmer's chemical fertilizer reduction behavior from the perspective of farmer differentiation. Heliyon, 8(12). https://org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11918