ارزیابی عوامل مؤثر بر ظرفیت تاب‌آوری خانوارهای روستایی تحت تأثیر خشکسالی: مطالعه موردی روستاهای شهرستان زهک

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• علیرضا ثانی حیدری
• محمود دانشور کاخکی
• محمود صبوحی صابونی
• حسین محمدی

گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

https://doi.org/10.22067/jead.2024.88277.1272

چکیده

خشکسالی یک تهدید عمده برای امنیت معیشت خانوارهای روستایی کشور به‌حساب می‌آید و خسارت وارد شده به آنها طی سال‌های اخیر، گواه عدم درک وضعیت تاب‌آوری آنها بوده است. همچنین، ارزیابی شیوه‌های مدیریت خشکسالی کشور نشان می‌دهد که مداخلات فنی و مالی اجرا شده‌ فقر و بی‌عدالتی را در برخی مناطق گسترش داده است. بنابراین، با توجه به حساسیت موضوع تاب‌آوری به‌عنوان یک رویکرد غالب مؤثر بر ابعاد زندگی و معیشت خانوارهای روستایی و عدم مطالعه جامع به عوامل زیربنایی آن، این پژوهش به دنبال سنجش ظرفیت تاب‌آوری خانوارها در برابر خشکسالی و ارزیابی عوامل اثرگذار آن است. داده‌ها از طریق تکمیل پرسشنامه چند بعدی از 376 خانوار در سال 1402 جمع‌آوری شد. برای سنجش ظرفیت تاب‌آوری خانوار از چارچوب نظری TANGO و برای ارزیابی عوامل اثرگذار از الگوی شانس متناسب جزئی استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد میانگین ارزش ظرفیت تاب‌آوری خانوارهای روستایی 26/27 است که حاکی از سطح پایین ظرفیت تاب‌آوری آنها است. همچنین، نتایج الگوی شانس متناسب جزئی نشان داد متغیرهای تحصیلات سرپرست خانوار، سطح مهارت در فعالیت‌های کشاورزی، پس‌انداز، درآمد خانوار، تعداد تماس‌های خانوار با ترویج کشاورزی، عضویت سرپرست خانوار در گروه‌های اجتماعی و دسترسی به اعتبارات خرد دارای اثر مثبت و متغیرهای ارزش زیان محصولات کشاورزی و تعداد دام‌های تلف شده خانوارها دارای اثر منفی و قابل توجهی بر ظرفیت تاب‌آوری خانوارهای روستایی در برابر خشکسالی داشته است. در نهایت، با توجه به اینکه یکی از عوامل کلیدی اثرگذار بر ظرفیت تاب‌آوری خانوارها دسترسی به اعتبارات خرد است؛ لذا سیاست‌گذاران بایستی در گام اول به ترویج و تقویت نهادهای پرداخت کننده آن بپردازند؛ در گام دوم با ارائه اطلاعات و کاهش محدودیت‌های وثیقه‌ای سطح دسترسی خانوارها به اعتبارات خرد را بهبود دهند و در گام سوم، ایجاد گزینه‌های سازگاری، ارتقای آگاهی و آموزش مهارت‌های کسب و کار را در اولویت قرار دهد تا خانوارها برای مدیریت اعتبارات دریافتی آماده شوند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• الگوی شانس متناسب جزئی
• چارچوب نظری TANGO
• ظرفیت انتقال
• ظرفیت جذب
• ظرفیت سازگاری

موضوعات

• توسعه کشاورزی و روستایی

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Factors Influencing the Resilience Capacity of Rural Households Affected by Drought: A Case Study of the Villages of Zehak City

نویسندگان [English]

• A. Sani Heidary
• M. Daneshvar Kakhki
• M. Sabouhi Sabouni
• H. Mohammadi

, Department of Agricultural Economics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction
Considering being located in arid and semi-arid regions of the world, Iran is influenced by the most severe impacts of drought. Drought is considered a major threat to the livelihood of rural households. During the recent drought, rural households faced significant losses and hardships, underscoring their lack of preparedness for this natural hazard. Consequently, every society must take proactive measures to manage changes, mitigate threats, and respond effectively. A review of the country's drought management programs reveals that policymakers have consistently prioritized increased production, even amid the critical conditions of recent droughts. This focus on boosting production to meet the basic needs of a growing population has taken precedence over enhancing rural households' livelihoods and resilience. However, improving rural households' resilience in drought conditions hinges on prioritizing their capacity for adaptability and flexibility. Therefore, considering the sensitivity of the issue of resilience as a dominant approach effective on the dimensions of life and livelihood of rural households on the one hand and the lack of a comprehensive study on its underlying factors, on the other hand, this research seeks to answer two questions: First, what is the resilience level of rural households against drought? Second, what factors influence the resilience levels of rural households in drought conditions?
 
Materials and Methods
The statistical population of this study is 16,817 rural households in Zehak city, located in Sistan and Baluchistan province, which are strongly influenced by different climatic events such as drought, excessive heat, low rainfall and 120-day winds. A stratified random sampling method was used to determine the sample size. According to Cochran's formula, the sample size is estimated to be 376 households. Data were collected by completing multidimensional questionnaires along with semi-structured interviews from households in 2023. To measure the resilience capacity of rural households, the theoretical framework of TANGO based on the estimation of the three capacities of absorption, adaptation and transfer was used through the factor analysis method, in which attitudinal and mental aspects of resilience are also taken into account. Finally, partial proportional odds model has been used to evaluate the influencing factors on the resilience capacity of rural households.
 
Results and Discussion
The results of the state of resilience capacity of rural households in the region indicated that the average value of their resilience capacity is 26.27, which shows the low level of resilience capacity in the region. Also, the households of the region are in a bad situation based on the absorption, adaptation and transmission capacities, and the households of the region have a stronger transmission capacity than the absorption and adaptation capacity against drought. The results of grouping the resilience capacity of households reveal that 32.45% are in the vulnerable group, 28.19% are in the relative resilience group, 22.61% are in the resilient group and 16.76% are in the high resilience group. The results show that more than 60% of households are at very low levels of resilience. Finally, the partial proportional odds model results demonstrated that the variables of education of the head of the household, skill level in agricultural activities, savings, household income, number of household contacts with agricultural extension, membership of the head of the household in social groups and access to microcredits have a positive effect and variables of the value of the loss of agricultural products and the number of livestock lost have a negative effect on the resilience capacity of rural households against drought.
 
Conclusion
According to the findings, policy-makers should prioritize strengthening the variables that determine the resilience capacity and its dimensions in the implementation of drought management programs so that households can absorb drought shocks without damaging their basic components. Policy-makers should also target specific categories of risks, dimensions of vulnerability and resilience in different time periods (before, during, and after shock) in order to choose comprehensive strategies to build and increase resilience. For instance, before a shock, better access to early detection of emerging climate risks could help farmers plan their cropping activities accordingly. Access to climate information allows for forward-looking adaptation that reduces the impact of shocks and increases resilience.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Absorption capacity
• Adaptation capacity
• Partial proportional odds model
• TANGO theoretical framework
• Transfer capacity

©2024 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

مراجع

1. Ahmadalipour, A., Moradkhani, H., Castelletti, A., & Magliocca, N. (2019). Future drought risk in Africa: Integrating vulnerability, climate change, and population growth. Science of the Total Environment, 662, 672-686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.278
2. Akhgari, M., & Ghasemian Moghaddam, A. (2023). Prioritization of the effective factors on increasing the economic resilience of rural households against drought (Study case: Dastgerdan section of Tabas county). Village and Space Sustainable Development, 4(2), 112-129. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22077/VSSD.2023.5530.1121
3. Babaei, M., Jalalian, H., & Afrakhtehh, H. (2021). Spatial analysis of livelihood resilience in rural areas (Case study: villages around Lake Urmia, Urmia city). Geographical Engineering of Territory, 5(1), 125-140. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/JGET-2009-1188(R1)
4. Béné, C., Frankenberger, T., Griffin, T., Langworthy, M., Mueller, M., & Martin, S. (2019). ‘Perception matters’: New insights into the subjective dimension of resilience in the context of humanitarian and food security crises. Progress in Development Studies, 19(3), 186-210.‏ https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993419850304
5. Béné, C., Wood, R.G., Newsham, A., & Davies, M. (2012). Resilience: new utopia or new tyranny? Reflection about the potentials and limits of the concept of resilience in relation to vulnerability reduction programs. IDS Working Papers, 2012(405), 1-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2012.00405.x
6. Beyene, F., Senapathy, M., Bojago, E., & Tadiwos, T. (2023). Rural household resilience to food insecurity and its determinants: Damot Pulasa district, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 11, 100500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100500
7. Calloway, E. E., Carpenter, L. R., Gargano, T., Sharp, J. L., & Yaroch, A. L. (2022). Development of three new multidimensional measures to assess household food insecurity resilience in the United States. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1048501. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1048501
8. Chiwaula, L.S., Chirwa, G.C., Simbeye, J., & Katundu, M. (2022). Household resilience among fish value chain actors during the COVID-19 pandemic in Malawi. World Development Perspectives, 26, 100411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2022.100411
9. Dawid, I., Haji, J., & Aman, M. (2023). Evaluating farm household resilience and perceptions of the role of small-scale irrigation in improving adaptability to climate change stress: evidence from eastern Ethiopia. Frontiers in Climate, 5, 1193910. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2023.1193910
10. Debie, E., & Ayele, A.W. (2023). Perceived determinants of Smallholder households’ resilience to livelihood insecurity in Goncha District, Northwest highlands of Ethiopia. SAGE Open, 13(3), 21582440231184861. https://doi.org/10.1177/215824402311848
11. Dhraief, M. Z., Dhehibi, B., Daly Hassen, H., Zlaoui, M., Khatoui, C., Jemni, S., & Rekik, M. (2019). Livelihoods strategies and household resilience to food insecurity: A case study from rural Tunisia. Sustainability, 11(3), 907. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030907
12. Egamberdiev, B., Bobojonov, I., Kuhn, L., & Glauben, T. (2023). Household resilience capacity and food security: evidence from Kyrgyzstan. Food Security, 15(4), 967-988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-023-01369-1
13. Ghasemi, M., Sahebi, Sh., & Mehregan, J. (2020). Identify livelihood resilience strategies against drought risk from the point of view of rural households (case study: Dehestan Golmakan, Chenaran County). Journal of Environmental Sciences 18(1), 117-136. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.29252/ENVS.18.1.117
14. Haile, D., Seyoum, A., & Azmeraw, A. (2022). Food and nutrition security impacts of resilience capacity: Evidence from rural Ethiopia. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 8, 100305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100305
15. Han, X., Lyu, K., Nie, F., & Chen, Y. (2024). Resilience effects for household food expenditure and dietary diversity in rural western China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 23(2), 384-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2023.12.010
16. Holling, C.S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009177856.038
17. Iran National Drought Warning and Monitoring Center (NDWMC). (2019). Iran Meteorological Organization, products, Drought percentage report of basins, Sistan and Baluchestan reports and maps.
18. Jalili-Bak, G., Bijani, M., Gholamrezai, S., & Momvandy, A. (2023). Analyzing rural people’s resilience in the face of floodwater: Evidence from Iran. Natural Hazards, 118(2), 1595-1618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06041-7
19. Jamshidi, O., Asadi, A., Kalantari, K., Azadi, H., & Scheffran, J. (2019). Vulnerability to climate change of smallholder farmers in the Hamadan province, Iran. Climate Risk Management, 23, 146-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2018.06.002
20. Keshavarz, M., Maleksaeidi, H., & Karami, E. (2017). Livelihood vulnerability to drought: A case of rural Iran. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 21, 223-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.12.012
21. Kumar, S., Mishra, A. K., Pramanik, S., Mamidanna, S., & Whitbread, A. (2020). Climate risk, vulnerability and resilience: Supporting livelihood of smallholders in semiarid India. Land Use Policy, 97, 104729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104729
22. Menike, L.M.C.S., & Arachchi, K.K. (2016). Adaptation to climate change by smallholder farmers in rural communities: Evidence from Sri Lanka. Procedia Food Science, 6, 288-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2016.02.057
23. Mododi Arkhodi, M., Boroumand, R., & Akbari, E. (2020). Explaining the resilience of rural areas against natural hazards with emphasis on flood. Journal of Natural Environmental Hazards, 9(23), 151-172. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22111/JNEH.2019.30067.1525
24. Molla, S.D., Zeleke, M.T., & Tamiru, S.M. (2024). Assessing livelihood resilience in drought-affected areas: Lessons from Raya Kobo district, northeast Ethiopia. Heliyon, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23399
25. Mondal, M., Biswas, A., Mandal, S., Bhattacharya, S., & Paul, S. (2023). Developing micro level resilience index for Indian Sundarban adopting Resilience Indicators for Measurement and Analysis (RIMA) methodology. Geosystems and Geoenvironment, 2(1), 100129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geogeo.2022.100129
26. Moradian, S.Z., Kakhki, M.D., & Sabouni, M.S. (2023). Evaluation of household resilience capacity index to food insecurity case study: Hosein Abad Rekhneh Gol village–Iran. New medit: Mediterranean Journal of Economics, Agriculture and Environment= Revue méditerranéenne d'economie, agriculture et Environment, 22(1), 115-127. https://doi.org/10.30682/nm2301h
27. Mozaffari, S., Mohammadi Yeganeh, B., & Cheraghi, M. (2023). Analysis of decision factors on coping strategies for rural households against insecurity with an emphasis on the pandemic case study of Urban Peripheral in Zanjan. Preipheral Urban Spaces Development, 5(2), 253-270. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22034/JPUSD.2023.386099.1263
28. Ronizi, S.R.A., & Lasboyee, M.R. (2019). Farmers' resilience against drought with an emphasis on economic factors and social capital in rural areas: a case study of Roniz in Estahban County. Journal of Rural Research, 10(2), 230-243. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22059/JRUR.2018.230885.1090
29. Safari Aliakbari, M. (2022). Investigating factors affecting the economic and social resilience of rural areas (Case study, Kermanshah County). Spatial Planning, 12(4), 43-64. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22108/SPPL.2023.137043.1710
30. Savari, M., Damaneh, H.E., & Damaneh, H.E. (2023). Effective factors to increase rural households' resilience under drought conditions in Iran. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 90, 103644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103644
31. Sina, D., Chang-Richards, A.Y., Wilkinson, S., & Potangaroa, R. (2019). What does the future hold for relocated community’s post-disaster? Factors affecting livelihood resilience. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 34, 173-183.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.015
32. Smith, L.C., Frankenberger, T.R., Aguiari, S., & Presnall, C. (2016). Resilience in the Sahel-Enhanced (RISE) Project Impact Evaluation: Baseline survey resilience analysis. Prepared for the feed the future FEEDBACK project of the United States Agency for International Development. TANGO. International, Tucson, AZ. https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00MFFC.pdf
33. Smith, L.C., & Frankenberger, T.R. (2018). Does resilience capacity reduce the negative impact of shocks on household food security? Evidence from the 2014 floods in Northern Bangladesh. World Development, 102, 358-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.07.003
34. Upton, J., Constenla-Villoslada, S., & Barrett, C.B. (2022). Caveat utilitor: A comparative assessment of resilience measurement approaches. Journal of Development Economics, 157, 102873.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2022.102873
35. Udmale, P., Ichikawa, Y., Manandhar, S., Ishidaira, H., & Kiem, A.S. (2014). Farmers׳ perception of drought impacts, local adaptation and administrative mitigation measures in Maharashtra State, India. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 10, 250-269.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.09.011
36. Wang, Y., Yan, J., & Wu, Y. (2024). Impact of policy measures on smallholders’ livelihood resilience: Evidence from Hehuang Valley, Tibetan Plateau. Ecological Indicators, 158, 111351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111351
37. Watkins, M. (2021). A step-by-step guide to exploratory factor analysis with Stata. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003149286
38. Williams, R. (2006). Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. The Stata Journal, 6(1), 58-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0600600104
39. Zarif Moradian, S., Sabouhi Sabouni, M., & Daneshvar Khakhki, M. (2022). The effect of drought on rural farmers households resilience index. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 36(3), 301-315. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jead.2022.75508.1124
40. Zhang, Q., Gong, J., & Wang, Y. (2024). How resilience capacity and multiple shocks affect rural households’ subjective well-being: A comparative study of the Yangtze and Yellow River Basins in China. Land Use Policy, 142, 107192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107192