کاربرد الگوی چند سطحی تعادل در معنی‌داری تبلیغات عمومی بر سود صنعت تولید شیر در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• حبیب شهبازی ¹
• احمد سام دلیری ²

¹ دانشگاه سید جمال الدین اسد آبادی

² دانشگاه سید جمال الدین اسدآبادی

https://doi.org/10.22067/jead2.v0i0.69994

چکیده

محصولات لبنی به‌ویژه شیر، نقش مهمی در سبد مصرف کالاهای سلامت‌بخش خانوارهای ایرانی دارد. از دیرباز افزایش میزان مصرف این ماده غذایی، از سیاست‌های دولت بوده است. یکی از راه‌های افزایش مصرف خانوارها، ترویج مصرف شیر با استفاده از تبلیغات عمومی می‌باشد. با توجه به اینکه تبلیغات عمومی، هزینه‌بر است، پرسش اصلی این است که آیا در سال‌های گذشته، تبلیغات عمومی در صنعت تولید شیر توانسته است بر تقاضای شیر (از جنبه مصرف‌کنندگان) و در نتیجه سود صنعت تولید شیر (از جنبه تولید‌کنندگان) اثرگذار باشد. بنابراین، هدف این پژوهش بررسی الگوی معنی‌داری تبلیغات عمومی شیر بر تقاضای خرده‌فروشی و سود صنعت در یک الگوی چند سطحی تعادل در سال 1395 در کشور است. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که به‌طور میانگین مقدار آماره بر اساس شاخص شدت تبلیغات عمومی در بازار رقابتی چندسطحی شیر، 519/1 تا 657/10 خواهد بود. این مقدار بر اساس شاخص شدت تبلیغات عمومی برای بازار رقابتی چندسطحی محصولات لبنی، 032/3 تا 692/3 و برای بازار غیررقابتی 981/0 تا 414/3 می‌باشد. یعنی، با غیررقابتی‌تر شدن بازار، معنی‌داری تبلیغات کاهش ‌می‌یابد. بطور میانگین در سناریوهای مختلف قیمت نهاده در سطح مزرعه معنی‌داری از 937/2 تا 414/3 تغییر می‌کند. میانگین معنی‌داری تبلیغات شیر در تمامی سناریوها 883/3 بدست آمده است. بنابراین در تمامی سناریوهای در نظر گرفته‌شده، تبلیغات شیر اثر معنی‌داری بر تقاضای مصرف‌کنندگان و سود صنعت تولید شیر دارد. همچنین با افزایش کشش قیمتی تقاضای شیر فرآوری‌شده در سطح خرده‌فروشی و قیمت نهاده تولید شیر خام در سطح مزرعه (قیمت علوفه، کاه، گندم، جو و ...)، سطح معنی‌داری تبلیغات بر تقاضای شیر فرآوری‌شده در سطح خرده فروشی کاهش و با افزایش ضریب بهینه تبلیغات (شاخص شدت تبلیغات) سطح معنی‌داری تبلیغات افزایش می‌یابد. پیشنهاد می‌شود به منظور تأثیرگذاری بیشتر تبلیغات عمومی بر افزایش مصرف شیر، سیاست‌هایی در جهت کاهش قیمت نهاده‌های تولید و افزایش شاخص شدت تبلیغات را اجرا نمود. سیاست‌هایی که موجب رقابتی‌تر شدن بازار شیر (در سطوح مختلف بازاریابی) شود، نیز می‌تواند مفید باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• تبلیغات عمومی
• الگوی معنی‌داری
• آماره F
• بازار غیررقابتی
• الگوی چندسطحی تعادل

20.1001.1.20084722.1398.33.1.3.9

عنوان مقاله [English]

Application of Multi-market Equilibrium Model on General Advertising Significance Model in Profit of Milk Industry in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

• H. Shahbazi ¹
• A. Samdeliri ²

¹ Sayyed Jamaleddin Asadabadi University

² Sayyed Jamaleddin Asadabadi University

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Dairy products, especially milk, play an important role in healthy food basket of Iranian households. The long-standing increase in the consumption of this food has been a policy of the government. In recent years, government efforts to increase per capita consumption of dairy products and milk have led to an increase in demand for these products; with the per capita consumption of milk in 2016 equals 27.1 liters. Studies indicate that price of milk does not have impressive impact on milk consumption. For example, Cyprus, with very high price for milk, is one of the leading countries in milk consumption. Therefore, it seems that other factors have contributed to increase of demand for milk in the countries. One of the factors is general advertising of milk that promotes milk consumption among households. Today, advertising is an essential element in introducing goods and products and serving the needs of human life. Advertising should be used to boost economic movement by identifying the product. The role of advertising can be examined in a chain of influence from firm level to market level for sales and product demands. Therefore, because of the milk consumption importance, governments, spend money on advertising in order to increase its consumption. This policy (increasing demand by general milk advertising) has been prevalent in the world for many years and has been the main task of governments, for example, in the United Kingdom in 2015 about 12.4 million pounds or in the United States between years of 2000 to 2001, an average of 25.1 million dollars annually been spent on general advertising of milk. This approach can also be applied to government policies in Iran.  Given that general advertising is costly, the key question is whether general advertising in milk industry can affect the demand for milk (from the consumer's point of view) and, as a result, the profit of milk industry (from the perspective of producers). Although the results of assessment about the effect of advertising on consumption and profits of firms producing basic goods, including milk, have been reported in other studies, but the reliability of estimates has not been studied. This is basically due to the unknown type of statistical distribution of the effect of advertising.
Materials and Methods:  In this study, the effect of advertising is estimated by analyzing the statistical significance of general advertising and its reliability. Also, with the simultaneous review of the effect of general advertising on industry profits and retail demand in a multi-market equilibrium model that considers advertising effects from farm to retail, the results are more reliable. So, the Significance of model of general advertising on milk industry profit in a multi-market equilibrium is examined. The purpose of this study is to investigate the significant role of general advertisement on Iran’s milk retail demand and industry profits in a multi-market equilibrium in 2016.
Results and Discussion: Results indicated that by increasing the price elasticity of demand for processed milk at retail level, the level of advertising significance statistically declined and by increasing in input prices for raw milk production at farm level (forage, straw, wheat, barley, etc.), in most own price elasticities scenarios of demand, the level of advertising significance statistically declined, but by increasing the optimal advertisement budget (advertising intensity index), the level of advertising significance statistically increases, but when the markets are considered as multi equilibrium, the interval of milk general advertising significances declines for the minimum and maximum advertising intensity indicator. However, the more the market moves towards non-competitiveness, the significance level of processed milk general advertising declines. Also, results show that the average of the F statistics in competitive multi- market of milk is 1.519 to 10.657. This value for the competitive multi- market of dairy is 3.032 3.692 and for the non-competitive market is 0.981-3.414. Namely, with a less competitive market, general advertising effect declines significantly. On average, in different scenarios of the input price at farm level, general advertising effect varies significantly from 2.937 to 3.414.  The mean of milk advertising significant level in all scenarios is 3.883. Therefore, in all considered scenarios, milk advertising has a significant effect on consumer demand and the profit of the milk industry.  The effect of processed milk general advertising at retail level on the price of raw milk at farm level shows that the effect of advertising on farm prices decreases with increasing price elasticity. Also, by increasing the index of optimal advertising intensity, the effect of advertising on farm prices also decreases. The more the market goes to non-competitive, the effect of general advertising on the price increases at farm level. The average advertising effectiveness (advertising budget) is found to be at farm level price of 0.009226.
Conclusion: According to this study results, the effect of advertising on industry profits is significant enough to justify advertising programs. This issue is examined by considering the statistical distribution of the effect of advertising on industry profits as a function of the statistical distribution of the effect of advertising on consumption. The results showed that the F-statistic for examining the effect of advertising on industrial profits was equal to the F-statistic associated with the reduced form of advertising effect on product prices. While the size of the effect of advertising on profits increased with the effect of advertising on demand, there was no significant correlation between the effect of demand and the significant effect of profit. One of the most important results of this study is that the statistical significance of advertising in demand function is neither necessary nor sufficient for the statistical significance of the effect of advertising in the reduced forms of price and profit functions of the industry. Therefore, it is suggested that in the study of the effectiveness of variables, the effects of different levels of marketing, the assumption of the type of market are considered. Also, in order to increase the influence of general advertising on milk consumption, decision makers can implement polices to reduce the prices of inputs and increase the intensity of advertising. Also, policies that make the milk market more competitive (at various levels of marketing) can be beneficial.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• General advertising
• Significance model
• F statistics
• Non-competitive market
• Multi-market equilibrium model

مراجع

1. Aghapour Sabbaghi M., and Koopahi M. 2005. Estimation of the systemic demand for milk and milk products for urban households (2002-2008). Zahedan. (In Persian with English abstract)

2. Balagtas J.V., and Kim S. 2007. Measuring the effects of generic dairy advertising in a multi-market equilibrium. American Journal of Agricultural Econmics 89(4): 932–946.

3. CDIC. 2016. Milk and Cheese Report, Canadian Dairy Information Centre, www.dairyinfo.gc.ca.

4. Chizari A.H., Shokoohi Z., Salami H., and Hosseini S.S. 2014. Existence of consumer habits and empirical analysis of demand: case study of dairy products demand for urban households in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics 9(2): 19-35. (In Persian with English abstract)

5. Davis G.C. 2005. The significance and insignificance of demand analysis in evaluating promotion programs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87(3): 673-688.

6. Erfanian Z. 2008. Assesment of Advertisng in Iranain milk Demand, Msc Thesis, Faculty of Agricultural Economics and development, University of Tehran. (In Persian with English abstract)

7. Fao. 2018. Data, Http://www.faosatat.org.

8. Fomby T.B., Hill R.C., and Johnson S.R. 1984. Advanced Econometrics. New York: SpringerVerlag.

9. Hosseini S.S., and Erfnian Z. 2008. Factors affecting the demand for milk and dairy product: with an emphasis on advertising (study of the Iranian milk industry). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research 39(1): 1-9. (In Persian with English abstract)

10. IDIS. 2016. Report for Diary Full Cost, Iranian Dairy Industy Society, www.ir-dis.org.

11. Kaiser H. 2010. Measuring the Impacts of Generic Fluid Milk and Dairy Marketing. National Institute for Commodity Promotion Research and Evaluation.

12. Papaioannou L., Tzimitra– Kalogianni L., and Tegkelidou E. 2015. The Influence of advertisement in fresh milk consumers’ behavior. Proceeding of 7th International Conference Information and Communication Technology in Agriculture, Cavalla.

13. Patalinghug J.C. 2015. The effect of advertising and in-store promotions on the demand for chocolate. International Journal of Economics and Finance 7(10): 1-10.

14. Pishbahar I., and Kheirinataj M. 2014. Dairy demand survey in Iran using the almost ideal demand system. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research 45(3): 690-701. (in Persian with English abstract)

15. Rejeana M.G., Oral Capps J., and Dharmasen S. 2014. Dynamics of Advertising and demand for fluid milk in the United States: an incomplete demand approach, Minneapolis.

16. Rejeena M.G., Dharmasen S., and Oral Capps J. 2014. Dynamics of Advertising and Demand for Milk in the United States Delineated by Milk Fat Type, Dallas.

17. Shaffer G., and Zettelmeyer F. 2009. Comparative advertising and in-store displays. Marketing Science 28(6): 1144-1156.

18. Shahbazi H. 2015. Generic advertising optimum budget for Iran’s milk industry. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Developmen, 29(4): 389-400. (In Persian with English abstract)

19. Shahbazi H. 2016. Generic dairy advertising effects in a multi-market equilibrium. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development 10(3): 89-112. (In Persian with English abstract)

20. Shahbazi H., Balali H., and Hakempoor M. 2016. Measurement of market power and cost efficiency in Iran's milk industry. Journal of Agricultural Economics 10(1): 17-35. (In Persian with English abstract)

21. Shahbazi H., and Faryadras V. 2018. Milk optimal generic advertising expenditure in an imperfect competitive marketing level. Agricultural Economics and Development Journal 26(2): 217-224. (In Persian with English abstract)

22. Shahbazi H., Kavoosi M., Peikani GH.R., Erfanian Z., and Abedi S. 2009. Estimation of deadweight loss of monopoly in the milk production industry in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development 65: 39-54. (In Persian with English abstract)

23. Shahnooshi N., Bakhshoodeh M., Firoozzare A., Azarinfar Y., and Nikoukar A. 2011. Adequacy assesment of animal protein products supply in the goals of the fourth Development Plan. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development 74(19): 221-249. (In Persian with English abstract)

24. SLAL. 2017. Annunal Report of Prices of poultry livestock inputs and products, State Livestock Affairs Logistics Inc, http://www.iranslal.com.

25. Statista. 2017. Per capita consumption of fluid milk worldwide in 2016, by country, The Statistics Portal.