Application of Integrated Hydro-economic Optimization Model for Water Resources Management of Qarehsou River Basin to Wetland Protection and Food Security

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• F. Mazraeh ¹
• H. Amirnejad ¹
• A. Nikouei ²

¹ Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Sari University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Sari, Iran

² Economic, Social and Extension Research Department, Isfahan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Isfahan, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jead.2022.70539.1049

Abstract

Introduction
In recent years, climate change and global warming, by reducing rainfall and higher temperature, have increased the frequency and severity of drought and water scarcity in various parts of the world, including Iran. The study of the annual discharge of rivers located in Qarahsu basin (Golestan province) showed that this basin has also faced drought in recent years and since most of the water required of Miankaleh wetland is supplied from Qarahsu River, so Water abstraction for agricultural, urban and industrial uses will have a major impact on the ecosystem of Miankaleh wetland. Given that agriculture is the main economic activity in the Golestan province and also it is the largest consumer of water and food security providers in the region Therefore, reducing irrigation water consumption can provide the extra water needed to protect the wetland. In order to sustainable supply water required of Miankaleh wetland in Gorgan Gulf, and preventing to dry the wetland, and using area's capacity in food security, attending to water resources management is very important in Qarehsou river Basin and Gorgan Gulf (Miankaleh wetland).
Materials and Methods
In this paper, a hydro-economic river basin model was used to water optimal allocation of Qarehsou River among water users in the basin (including irrigation activities, urban, industrial, and fishery uses, and environment) and protecting the Miankaleh wetland ecosystem (Gorgan Gulf). The empirical river basin model includes three reduce forms of hydrological components, regional optimization components, and environmental components and can make the integrated linkage between hydrologic, economic, institutional, and environmental components. This model also simulates demand nodes' behavior under different drought scenarios. The linkage between the three model components allows a rigorous evaluation of the quantitative impacts of drought on water availability in the river basin under study, the effects on the users’ behaviors, and the private and social-economic benefits and costs of water use. The hydrological model of the river basin is based on the principles of water mass balance, which determine the volume of water availability in the different river reaches. This water available can be used for economic activities after taking into account the environmental restrictions for economic activities. In the economic component, the economic benefits of water demand are maximized by using water demand functions subject to technical and resource constraints. In the environmental component, we maximize the benefits that environmental characteristics provide for society and compare them with the benefits of other applications.
Results and Discussion
The results showed, in the current condition, the allocation and consumption of water have not been optimal between nodes in the Qarehsou river basin. In the normal water supply scenario, also total water sources decreased to protect Miankaleh wetland in suitable condition, but the area under cultivation of the most crops increases, which increases water resources consumption in this sector, and finally, the net benefits of the agriculture sector has grown positively. Also, by allocating 18 million cubic meters of water to the wetland, because of optimal water allocation, urban water consumption, and annual gross benefit increase, too. In drought conditions, because of water shortage due to climate change and reduction headwater and surface flows to preserve the wetland, water consumption reduced by all nodes, especially irrigation node. Agricultures can prevent from reducing excessive of their income by changing in cultivation pattern, deficit planting crops with less water, etc. Under drought conditions and water scarcity, although the amount of water available is reduced to all applicant nodes compared to baseline conditions, but it improves the economic benefits of stakeholders, especially the environment sector.
Increasing groundwater extraction and decreasing surface water (due to drought and wetland water supply from headwater flow), although Qarehsou river basin has faced water scarcity problem, due to the optimal distribution of water between water demand nodes based on the economic-hydrological model used by changing the cultivation pattern and the use of drought-tolerant crops, the amount of water entering the Miankaleh wetland has increased in normal and drought scenarios and as a result has increased the gross environmental benefits of Qarehsou basin. Therefore, it is recommended to protect the Miankaleh wetland and increase its ecological function, reduce the water allocated value to irrigation sector, and to increase the farmers economy efficiency, optimal cultivation pattern, and applying deficit irrigation strategies promote by agricultural jihad experts in province, and in drought conditions is used suitable strategies for drought to improve water resources management.
 

Keywords

• Hydrological-economic optimization model
• Water scarcity
• Wetland

20.1001.1.20084722.1401.36.1.2.9

Main Subjects

• Environment and Natural Resources Economics

References

1. Adibpor M., Shirashiani R. 2014. Estimation of water demand function in Golestan Province household sector. Quarterly Jornal of Economical Modelling 26(2): 91-106. (In Persian with English abstract)
2. Ahmady M., and Asghari S. 2013. The environmental consequences of reduced water levels in the Lake Uromieh and its Survival. Quarterly Gheograghycal Jornal of Territory (Sarzamin) 40: 81-96. (In Persian with English abstract)
3. Akter S., Grafton R.Q., and Merritt W.S. 2020. Integrated hydro-ecological and economic modeling of environmental flows: Macquarie Marshes, Australia. Agricultural Water Management 145: 98-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2013.12.005.
4. Alcamo J., Henrichs T., and Rösch T. 2000. World Water in 2025: Global modeling and scenario analysis for the world commission on water for the 21st century. Kassel World Water Series. Report No 2. Center for Environmental System Research. University of Kassel. Kassel.
5. Amirnejad H., Rafiee H., and Atghaee M. 2010. Estimation of the preservation value of environmental resources (Case study: Miankaleh international wetland). Jornal of Envirenmental Studies 53: 89-98. (In Persian with English abstract)
6. Blaco G, Varela-Ortega I., and R.Purkey D. 2013. Integrated assessment of policy interventions for promoting sustainable irrigation in semi-arid environments: a hydro-economic Modeling Approach 124: 144-160.
7. Booker J.F., Michelsen A., and Ward F.A. 2005. Economic impact of alternative policy responses to prolonged and severe drought in the Rio Grande Basin. Water Resources Research 41: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003486.
8. Brouwer R., and Hofkes M. 2008. Integrated hydro-economic modelling: approaches, key issues and future research directions. Ecological Economics 66(1): 16-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.009.
9. Do P., Tian F., Zhu T., Zohidov B., Ni G., Lu H., and Liu H. 2020. Exploring synergies in the water-food-energy nexus by using an integrated m2.
10. Ebrahimipak N.A., Egdernezhad A., Tafteh A., and Khadadai D. 2018. Evaluation of aquacrop model to simulate canola (Brassica napus) yield under deficit irrigation scenarios in gazvin plain .Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research 49(5): 1003-1015. (In Persian with English abstract)
11. El-Shawafy M.A., Ramadan A., El-Shafie A., and El-Baset M. 2020. Effect of deficit irrigation scheduling and mminimum tillage on the water stress, water application efficiency, yield and water productivity of barley under sandy soil conditions. Plant Archives 20(2): 3138-3148.
12. Environmental Protection Agency, deputy for natural resources and biodiversity, habitats and regional affairs office. 2013. Detailed stage studies of the Management plan of Miankaleh biosphere reserves in Mazandaran province. (In Persian)
13. Esmaelnejad M., Akbarpour M., Mikaniki J., and Falsoleinan M. 2018. Assessing the implications of climate change on food security and rural livelihoods case study: rural farmers in Migan Nehbandan. Geography 57: 5-18. (In Persian with English abstract)
14. Esavi V., and Rezaei-Chianeh E. 2014.Analysis the impact of drought and land use/cover changes on wetlands ecosystem of Sulduz region. Wetland Ecobiology 19: 91-101. (In Persian with English abstract)
15. EshaghiNasrabadi E., Shahnazari A., Ziatabarahmadi M.Kh., Aghajani GH., and Karandish F. 2014. Investigation of quantity and quality traits of maize yield under partial root zone drying and deficit irrigation strategies. Jornal of Irrigation Sciences and Engineering 3: 73-82. (In Persian with English abstract)
16. Esteve P., Varela-Ortega C., Gutierrez I.B., and Downing T. 2015. A hydro-economic model for the assessment of climate change impacts and adaptation in irrigated agriculture. Ecological Economics 120: 49-58
17. Fardad H. 2011. General irrigation (methods irrigation). University of Tehran, Iran. (In Persian )
18. 2003. Food and nutrition technical assistance project (fanta) and food aid management (FAM). Food Access indicator review. Washington, D.C.
19. 2006. Food security strategies: the Asian experience. FAO Agricultural Policy and Economic Development Series.
20. Finlayson CM., and Spiers AG. 1999. Global review of wetlands resources and priorities for wetland inventory. Supetvising Scientist Report/ Wetlands International Publication 53, Supetvising Scientist, Canberra.
21. Galbraith H., Amerasinghe P. H., and Huber- Lee A. 2005. The effects of agricultural irrigation on wetland ecosystems in developing countries: a literature review. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). Comperhenesive Assessment Secretariat.
22. Golestan Provice Governorate. 2018. https://golestanp.ir/moarefi-ostan/print:page,1,18.
23. Haab T.C., and McConnell K.E. 2003. Valuing environmental and natural resources: the econometrics of non-market valuation. Edward Elgar Pub. Cheltenham, UK.
24. 2011. Water: the unifying element in our system international water resources management institute. Retrieved from http:// www.iwmi.cgiar.org/Topics/Climate_Change/
25. Kahil M.T., Albiac J., Dinar J., Calvo E., Esteban E., Avella L., and Garcia-Molla M. 2016. Improving the performance from drought in Spain. Water 2016, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/w8020034.
26. Kahil M.T., Dinar A., and Albiac J. 2014. Modeling water scarcity and drought severity for policy adaptation to climate change: application to the Jucar Basin, Spain, University of California Water Science and Policy Center, Working Paper 01- 0114,January 2014.
27. Kalbali E., Ziaeee S., MardaniNajafabadi M., and Zakerinia M. 2021. Approaches to adapting to impacts of climate change in northern Iran: The application of a hydrogy-economics model. Journal of Cleaner Production v (280): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124067.
28. Kingsford R.T. 2000. Ecological impacts of dams, water diversions and river management on flood plain wetlands in Australia. Austral Ecology 25(2): 109-127. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9993.2000.01036.x.
29. Kafi M., and Jami Alahmadi M. 2020. Challenges of the agricultural sector in the face of drought and water shortages and possible solutions. In Presentation at 16th National Iranian Crops Science Congress. Mollasani, Ahvaz, Khuzestan, Iran, 25^th – 27^th (In Persian with English abstract)
30. Lalitha R., and Vallalkannan S. 2019. Yield, crop response factor and water productivity of paddy under deficit irrigation condition. Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 9(Special): 291-295
31. Mainuddin M., Kirby M., and Qureshi M. E. 2007. Integrated hydrologic–economic modelling for analyzing water acquisition strategies in the Murray River Basin. Agricultural Water Management 3: 123-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2007.06.011.
32. Memon S.A., Sheikh I.A., Talpur M.A., Mangiro M.A. 2021. Impact of deficit irrigation on winter wheat in semi-arid climate of Sindh. Agriculture Water Maznagement 243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106389.
33. Mirchi A., Wathins D.W., Engel V., Sukop M.C., Czajkowski Bhat M., Rehage J., Letson D., Takatsuka Y., and Weisskoff R. 2018. A hydro- economic model of south Florida water resources system. Science of the Total Environment 628-629: 1531-1541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.111.
34. Mirkarimi S., Amirnejad H., and Julaie R. 2019. Optimal allocation and distribution of water resources in Gorganrood-Qarasu River Basin and investigation of its side effects: Random Bankruptcy Approach. Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Iran.
35. Mulugeta M.S., and Kannan N. 2015. Effect of deficit irrigation on maize under conventional, fixed and alternate furrow irrigation systems at Melkassa, Ethiopia. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) 4(11): 119-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV4IS110178.
36. Naderi N. 2010. Use of irrigation in conditions of water shortage and drought. Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Jihad Organization of Semnan Province, Agricultural Extension Coordination Management 21. (In Persian with English abstract)
37. Nikmehr S., and Zibaei M. 2020. Assessing the effects of climate change on hydrological and economic conditions of south Karkheh Sub-basin. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development 34(1): 63-79. (In Persian with English abstract)
38. Nikouei A., Zibaei M., and Ward F.A. 2012. Incentives to adopt irrigation water saving measures for wetlands preservation: an integrated basin scale analysis. Journal of Hydrology 464-465: 216-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.07.013.
39. Ouda S., Noreldin T., Alarcón J.J., Ragab R., Caruso G., Sekara A., Abdelhamid M.T. 2021. Response of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) to deficit irrigation management under the semi-arid environment of Egypt: Field and Modeling Study. Agriculture 90(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020090.
40. Patane C., Tringali S., and Sortino O. 2011. Effects of deficit irrigation on biomass, yield, water productivity and fruit quality of processing tomato under semi-arid Mediterranean climate conditions. Scientia Horticulturae 129: 590-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.04.030.
41. Qureshi M.E., Ranjan R., and Qureshi S.E. 2010a. An empirical assessment of the value of irrigation water: the case study of Murrumbidgee catchment. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 54(1): 99–118.
42. Rigenal Water compony of Golestan. 2016. (In Persian)
43. Ringler C., and Cai X. 2006. Valuing fisheries and wetlands using integrated economic– hydrologic modeling Mekong River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 132(6): 480–487. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2006)132:6(480)
44. Sepaskhah A., Tavakoli A., and Mousavi S.F. 2006. Principles and applications of deficit irrigation. Iranian National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage (IRNCID). (In Persian)
45. Smardon R. 2009. International wetland policy and management issues, sustaining the world’s wetlands. Springer New York. pp. 1–20.
46. Taghavi Kaljahi S., Reiazi B., and Taghavi L. 2014. Determination of environmental water requirement of Miankaleh wetland. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 2: 101-109. (In Persian with English abstract)
47. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).https://www.epa.gov/wetlands/why-are-wetlands-important
48. Vörösmarty C.J., P.B. McIntyre M.O., Gessner D., Dudgeon A., Prusevich P., Green S., Glidden S.E., Bunn, C.A. Sullivan Reidy Liermann C., and Davies P.M. 2010. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467: 555-561. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09440.
49. Ward F.A., Booker J.F., and Michelsen A.M. 2006. Integrated economic, hydrologic, and institutional analysis of policy responses to mitigate drought impacts in Rio Grande Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 132(6): 488-502. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2006)132:6(488).
50. World Food Programme (WFP). 2016. What is food security? World food programme, Viewed 06 June 2017, from https://www.wfp.org/node/359289.
51. Yosefian M., Shahnazari A., Ziyatabar Ahmadi M.Kh., Raeini M., and Arabzadeh B. 2018. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation and partial root drying on yield, yield components and water productivity of rice in furrow and basin methods. Journal of Water Research in Agriculturr 3: 341-351. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/22092/JWRA.2018.117788.