Document Type : Research Article-en
Authors
1
Department of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran
2
Department of Agricultural Machinery and Mechanization Engineering, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran
Abstract
We have strived to present a fresh definition of the water-energy-food-environment-decision makers (WEFED) nexus through the creation of a comprehensive and interconnected system. In this study, we considered criteria for consumption, mass productivity, and economic productivity related to irrigation water, renewable and non-renewable energy, as well as the criteria of fertilizer and pesticide use, CO2 emissions, and wetland conservation to elucidate the water-energy-food-environment (WEFE) nexus. We then assessed the impact of decision-makers’ perspectives on the nexus criteria under seven different management scenarios: water consumption management (WCM), energy consumption management (ECM), water economic management (WEM), energy economic management (EEM), environmental management (ENM), management with equal weight given to criteria (WEFE), and management with weight based on the opinions of decision makers in the study area (WEFED), employing TOPSIS method. To explicitly integrate decision-makers’ perspectives into this system (the WEFED approach), the weights assigned to each sustainability criterion in one scenario were determined directly based on a survey of local decision-makers using the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical Process (FAHP) method. The study findings revealed that in the WCM, ECM, and ENM scenarios, barley cultivation held the highest priority, yet despite improvements in environmental parameters, a decrease in water and energy economic productivity was observed compared to the current pattern. Conversely, in the WEM and EEM scenarios, tomato cultivation took precedence, and despite the deterioration of environmental conditions, enhanced mass and economic water and energy productivity were demonstrated compared to the current pattern. The discrepancy in results among the various sustainable scenario patterns underscored the substantial impact of decision-makers’ perspectives on sustainable agricultural management. Finally, it was determined that the WEFE scenario returned the greatest number of improvements (11 out of 13 criteria) in sustainable management criteria compared to the current pattern. Therefore, the findings revealed that a holistic, equally-weighted nexus approach (WEFE), while increasing water consumption, delivers the most balanced sustainability outcomes, though its implementation must be coupled with robust water governance.
Keywords
Subjects