با همکاری انجمن اقتصاد کشاورزی ایران

نقش سرمایه‌گذاری مستقیم خارجی و باز بودن تجاری در عملکرد بخش کشاورزی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصادی، دانشگاه بجنورد، بجنورد، ایران

چکیده
یکی از مهمترین اهداف همه کشورها به­ویژه کشورهای در حال توسعه، رسیدن به رشد و توسعه اقتصادی است و با توجه به اینکه بخش کشاورزی یکی از مهم­ترین بخش­های اقتصادی چنین کشورهایی است، بنابراین سیاست­گذران اقتصادی، همواره به‌دنبال رشد و توسعه این بخش هستند. سرمایه­گذاری مستقیم خارجی (FDI) برای سرعت بخشیدن به اقتصاد یک کشور در حال توسعه مانند ایران، بسیار مهم است. باز بودن تجاری و تأثیر آن بر رشد اقتصادی نیز به‌طور گسترده در ادبیات اقتصادی، مورد بحث و تحقیق قرار گرفته است. از این رو با توجه به اهمیت FDI و باز بودن تجاری در اقتصاد و مشخص نبودن اثر قطعی آنها بر عملکرد بخش کشاورزی از لحاظ نظری، در این مطالعه با استفاده از روش خودتوضیح با وقفه­های توزیعی (ARDL) به بررسی اثر سرمایه­گذاری مستقیم خارجی و باز بودن تجاری بر رشد تولید ناخالص داخلی بخش کشاورزی ایران طی دوره 1970-2022 به‌صورت تجربی پرداخته شد. نتایج این پژوهش نشان می­دهد که سرمایه­گذاری مستقیم خارجی، تولید ناخالص داخلی (رشد اقتصادی) و سرمایه ثابت ناخالص بر رشد تولید بخش کشاورزی ایران در بلندمدت، اثر مثبت و معنی­دار دارد. این در حالی است که اثر نرخ تورم بر رشد تولید بخش کشاورزی ایران در بلندمدت، منفی و معنی­دار است؛ اما باز بودن تجاری اثر معنی­داری بر رشد تولید بخش کشاورزی ایران در بلندمدت ندارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment and Trade Openness on the Performance of Iran's Agricultural Sector

نویسندگان English

R. Babaki
M. Efati
Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, University of Bojnord, Bojnord, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Given the importance of foreign direct investment (FDI) and trade openness in the economy and the theoretical ambiguity surrounding their effects on agricultural performance, this study employs the AutoRegressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach to empirically assess their impact. Specifically, it examines how FDI and trade openness have influenced the growth of gross domestic product (GDP) in Iran’s agricultural sector over the period 1970–2022.
 
Materials and Methods
The model utilized in this research is based on the study by Sultana and Sadkin (2023) as follows:
The variables employed in this research include: AFF: agricultural production growth, FDI: foreign direct investment, GDP: gross domestic product (economic growth), CPI: inflation rate, TRADE: degree of trade openness (free trade), GFC: gross fixed capital formation, and : stochastic term. The necessary data were gathered from the World Bank for the period from 1970 to 2022.
 
Results and Discussion
In this research, the generalized Dickey-Fuller tests were employed to assess the stationarity of the time series and the presence of unit roots. The order of their aggregation was determined accordingly. The generalized Dickey-Fuller test indicates that at a significance level of 5%, all variables, except for the growth of the agricultural sector with a one-time difference, are stationary in both the cases of having an intercept without a trend and having an intercept with a trend. Based on the results of the generalized Dickey-Fuller unit root tests, the accumulated model variables are of order one and zero. Consequently, the ARDL method is applied in this research.
To estimate long-run coefficients, it is essential to first verify the existence of a long-run relationship. Therefore, the F-Bound test introduced by Pesaran, Shin, and Smith (2001) is also utilized. This method confirms the existence of a long-run equilibrium relationship among the model's variables.
The results of the LM test indicate that there is no autocorrelation among the residuals in the examined model. In fact, the null hypothesis of no autocorrelation is not rejected. Additionally, the results of the heteroscedasticity test suggest that the null hypothesis of the absence of heteroscedasticity is not rejected, indicating homogeneity of variance.
The following table presents the results of model estimation using the ARDL method.
 
Model estimation results using the ARDL method




Long-run relationship




Variables


Coefficients


standard deviation


t-Student


Prob.




FDI


22.91


6.25


3.66


0.00




GDP


1.36


0.39


3.48


0.00




GFC


0.82


0.38


2.14


0.05




INF


-0.37


0.13


-2.68


0.02




TRADE


0.16


0.15


1.04


0.32




C


67.43


11.57


5.82


0.00




Source: Research findings
The error correction model is employed to assess how short-run imbalances of dependent variables are corrected towards long-run equilibrium. The results from estimating the error correction model indicate that the coefficient of the error correction term in the model is -0.20. This means that in each period, 20% of the imbalance in the agricultural sector is corrected, moving closer to its long-run equilibrium trend. To ensure the stability of the estimated regression coefficients and the accuracy of the results obtained, stability tests, including cumulative residual (CUSUM) and cumulative residual squared (CUSUMSQ), are conducted for the residuals of the short-run model. The results confirm the stability of the estimated coefficients during the studied period.
 
Conclusion
The findings of this research indicate that foreign direct investment (FDI) has a positive and significant impact on the long-term production growth of Iran's agricultural sector. However, commercial openness does not have a significant effect on the growth of production in this sector over the long run. Additionally, gross domestic product (economic growth) and gross fixed capital positively and significantly influence agricultural production growth. Conversely, the inflation rate negatively and significantly affects the production growth of the agricultural sector.
 
Acknowledgement
Given the positive and significant impact of FDI on agricultural production in the long run, it is essential to attract appropriate and efficient foreign direct investment to enhance local employment and investment, thereby boosting production and productivity in Iran's agricultural sector. Consequently, it is recommended that policymakers refine their strategies to foster an environment conducive to attracting foreign direct investment in agriculture, aiming to draw in more effective investments to elevate agricultural productivity. In this context, the country can adjust its tax and agricultural investment policies to establish a "suitable investment environment" that encourages long-term foreign investments in the agricultural sector. Furthermore, the government should implement policies aligned with agricultural needs and initiate relevant and practical training programs for farmers to enhance agricultural skills, enabling FDI to further develop the nation's agricultural sector. Additionally, to bolster the country's economic growth within the agricultural sector, innovative methods must be adopted to attract foreign direct investment. The lack of a significant effect of trade openness on the production of Iran's agricultural sector underscores the necessity to reassess the country's free trade policy to support various segments of the agricultural sector, thereby increasing production and improving the overall performance of agriculture.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Agricultural production growth
Auto regressive distributed lag (ARDL)
Foreign direct investment (FDI)
Trade openness  

Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

  1. Abbasi, F., Moghaddasi, R., & Kianirad, A. (2022). Investigating the effect of trade liberalization on agricultural growth and trade in Iran: Application of Markov-Switching Model. Agricultural Economics and Development, 29(4), 53-87. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.30490/aead.2022.353489.1313
  2. Ahmed, A., Devadason, E.S., & Jan, D. (2017). Does inward foreign direct investment affect agriculture growth? Some empirical evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, 13(1), 60-76. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJARGE.2017.084035
  3. Andersen, L., & Babula, R. (2008). The link between openness and long-run economic growth. Journal of International Commerce and Economics.
  4. Becker, C., & Morrison, A. (1999). Urbanization in transforming countries. In: Handbookof Regional and Urban Economics, third ed. Amsterdam, North-Holland, Chapter43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(99)80012-1
  5. Chaudhuri, S., & Yabuuchi, S. (2010). Formation of special economic zone, liberalized FDI policy and agricultural productivity. International Review of Economics & Finance, 19(4), 779–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref. 2010.02.004
  6. Daniel, J. (2012). 8 lecons de Histoire Économique. Odile Jacob, Paris.
  7. Demery, L. (1994). Structural adjustment: Its origins, rationale and achievements, in from adjustment to development in Africa, Giovanni Cornia and Gerald Helleiner (eds.), New York: St. Martin’s Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23596-4_2
  8. De Sormeaux, A., & Pemberton, C. (2011) Factors influencing agriculture’s contribution to GDP: Latin America and the Caribbean. Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus, Trinidad and Tobago. https://doi.org/10.5152/turkthoracj.2018.18036
  9. Djokoto, J. (2013). Openness and agricultural performance in Ghana. Journal of Science and Technology (Ghana), 33(2), 24-36. https://doi.org/10.4314/JUST.V33I2.3
  10. Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2001). Trade, growth, and poverty, World Bank, development research group, macroeconomics and growth. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2615
  11. Edeh, C.E., Eze, C.G., & Ugwuanyi, S.O. (2020). Impact of foreign direct investment on the agricultural sector in Nigeria (1981–2017). African Development Review32(4), 551-564.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12460
  12. Edwards, S. (1998). Openness, productivity and growth: what do we really know? The Economic Journal, 108(447), 383-398. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00293
  13. Elbadawi, I.A. (1998). From macroeconomic stabilization to medium-term growth in sub-saharan Africa: some lessons from world bank-supported adjustment programs. The Journal of Policy Reform, 2(1), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/13841289808523373
  14. Frankel, J.A., & Romer, D. (1999). Does trade cause growth? American Economic Review, 89(3), 379-399. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.3.379
  15. Gholipour, S., Mohammadzadeh, R., Bakhshoode, M., Azarinfar, Y., & Rafati, M. (2011). Study of agricultural trade openness impact on export and import shares of agriculture and services in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development25(4), 392-399. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22067/jead2.v0i0.12178
  16. Grossman, G.M., & Helpman, E. (1995). Technology and trade. Handbook of International Economics, in: G. M. Grossman & K. Rogoff (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 25, pages 1279-1337, Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4404(05)80005-X
  17. Hasan, M.K. (2017). The study of the problems in attracting inward FDI in Bangladesh. World Vision, 11(1), 56-73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343163132
  18. Hoque, M.M., & Yusop, Z. (2010). Impacts of trade liberalisation on aggregate import in Bangladesh: An ARDL Bounds test approach. Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, 21(1), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2009.09.004
  19. Jahangiri, Kh., Rezazadeh, A., & Jamshidi, S. (2015). Analysis of the flow of foreign direct investment in the agricultural sector and its effect on the export of the agricultural sector in Iran. Iran Agricultural Economics Conference. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/671631/
  20. Jalaie Esfandabadi, S., & Javdan, E. (2010). The impact of trade liberalization on the employment of Iranian agricultural sector. Agricultural Economics Research2(8), 135-150. (In Persian). 1001.1.20086407.1389.2.8.8.4
  21. Ju, P., Anser, M., Osabohien, R., Ochuba, O., Ahuru, R., & Ashraf, J. (2022). Trade openness, foreign direct investment and sustainable agriculture in Africa. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 17, 246-255. https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.1.22
  22. Karim, M., Safdari Nahad, M., & Amjadipour, M. (2014). Agricultural development and resistive economy, as a alternative to oil revenue. Journal of the Macro and Strategic Policies, 2(6), 103-127. (In Persian). https://www.jmsp.ir/article_7371_en.html
  23. Karikari, J.A. (1992). Causality between direct foreign investment and economic output in Ghana. Journal of Economic Development, 17(1), 7-17. https://doi.org/21474/IJAR01/7710
  24. Leylian, N., ebrahimi, M., Zare, H., & Haghighat, A. (2021). Investigating the effect of foreign direct investment and human capital on agricultural economic growth in selected Asian developing countries. Agricultural Economics Research13(2), 109-126. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22055/JQE.2021.32814.2225
  25. Lileeva, A. (2010). The benefits to domestically owned plants from inward direct investment: The role of vertical linkages. Canadian Journal of Economics, 43(2), 574–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5982.2010.01584.x
  26. Mohammadinodeh, A., Hasanvand, D., & Asayesh, H. (2020). Investigating the role of foreign direct investment on economic growth in economic sectors of Iran. QJER, 20(2), 121-144. (In Persian). 1001.1.17356768.1399.20.2.3.6
  27. Mohammadpour, S., Rezazadeh, A., & Reofi, A. (2020). Investigating the relationship between the degree of trade openness and economic growth in selected MENA countries: a bootstrap panel grangery causality approach. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 16(4), 101-128. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22055/jqe.2019.26967.1930
  28. Obansa, S.A., & Maduekwe, I.M. (2013). Agriculture financing and economic growth in Nigeria. European Scientific Journal, 9(1), 168-204. https://doi.org/10.52589/AJAFR-VV0CKXM8
  29. Oloyede, B.B. (2014). Impact of foreign direct investment on agricultural sector development in Nigeria (1981-2012). Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 3(12), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.12816/0018804
  30. Otaboyev, U. (2024). Thr impact of forien direct investment on the countrys agricultural production. Nordic_Press3(0003). ‏ https://research.nordicuniversity.org/index.php/nordic/article/view/1135/780
  31. Pesaran, M., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616
  32. Rahman, M., Rahaman, M.D., Sarkar, M.D., & Islam, M. (2024). Foreign direct investment and agricultural output nexus in Bangladesh: An autoregressive distributed lag approach. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 15, 101042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101042
  33. Rakotoarisoa, M.A. (2011). A contribution to the analyses of the effects of foreign agricultural investment on the food sector and trade in Sub-Saharan Africa, FAO. https://www.fao.org/4/aq384e/aq384e.pdf
  34. Rivera-Batiz, L., & Romer, P. (1991). Economic integration and endogenous growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 531-555. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937946
  35. Sultana, Z., & Sadekin, M.N. (2023). The impact of FDI on the agriculture sector: A case study from Bangladesh. Heliyon, 9(12), e22983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22983
  36. Tahir, M., & Azid, T. (2015). The relationship between international trade openness and economic growth in the developing economies: some new dimensions. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 8(2), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCEFTS-02-2015-0004
  37. Tahir, M., Mazhar, T., & Afridi, M.A. (2019). Trade openness and sectoral growth in developing countries: some new insights. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 12(2), 90-103. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCEFTS-01-2019-0001
  38. Thomson, K.J. (2011). Rising global interest in farmland: Can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits? Experimental Agriculture, 47(4), 730. https://doi.org/1017/S0014479711000548
  39. Wacziarg, R., & Welch, K.H. (2008). Trade liberalization and growth: New evidence. The World Bank Economic Review, 22(2), 187-231. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhn007
  40. Warner, A. (2003). Once more into the breach: Economic growth and integration. Working Papers, No 34, Center for Global Development. https://doi.org/2139/ssrn.1111718
  41. Yiyong, C., Gunasekera, D., & Newth, D. (2015) Effects of foreign direct investment in African agriculture. China Agricultural Economic Review, 7, 167-184. https://doi.org/10.1108/caer-08-2014-0080
  42. Zhang, D., Chen, C., & Sheng, Y. (2015). Public investment in agricultural R&D and extension: an analysis of the effects on Australian broadacre farming productivity. China Agricultural Economic Review, 7(1), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/CAER-05-2014-0052

 

ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
نام را وارد کنید.
نشانی پست الکترونیکی را به درستی وارد کنید.
وابستگی سازمانی را به درستی وارد کنید.
توضیحات را وارد کنید (حداقل 50 حرف)
CAPTCHA Image
شناسه امنیتی را به درستی وارد کنید.

  • تاریخ دریافت 02 تیر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 06 شهریور 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 12 شهریور 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 12 شهریور 1404