تحلیل ساختار بازار و روش‌های بازاریابی محصول زغال‏اخته با تاکید بر نقش دلالان در شهرستان کلیبر

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• مجتبی سوختانلو
• صمد دهقانپور
• اصغر باقری

گروه مهندسی آب و مدیریت کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران

https://doi.org/10.22067/jead.2020.17789.0

چکیده

زغال‌اخته (Cornus mas L.)، یکی از مهم‏ترین محصولات دارویی و ارگانیک استان آذربایجان شرقی شناخته می‏شود که بیشترین سطح زیرکشت این محصول در شهرستان کلیبر واقع است؛ اما به دلیل نبود مدیریت صحیح بازاریابی و نیز نفوذ دلالان، نتوانسته است جایگاه واقعی خود را در رونق اقتصادی منطقه و بهبود بهره‏وری تولیدکنندگان آن پیدا کند. لذا هدف تحقیق، تحلیل ساختار بازار و روش­های بازاریابی محصول زغال اخته (مؤلفه‏های 4Ps، مسیرهای بازاریابی و روش‏های بازاریابی) با تاکید بر نقش دلالان در شهرستان کلیبر در سال 1398 بود. جامعه آماری شامل همه تولیدکنندگان فعال زغال‏اخته در شهرستان کلیبر بودند که به روش نمونه‏گیری چندمرحله‌ای و با کمک جدول بارتلت و همکاران، 280 نفر به عنوان حجم نمونه تعیین شدند. یافته‏ها نشان داد روش‌ منتخب بازاریابی تولیدکنندگان زغال‌اخته، فروش سرمزرعه به دلالان بود. همچنین، اولویت اول تأثیرپذیری مؤلفه‏های 4Ps از دلالان، مربوط به مؤلفه قیمت بود. مطابق یافته‏ها، مسیر غالب بازار به صورت "تولیدکننده  ¥دلال‏ها و واسطه‏ها ¥ عمده‏فروش ¥ کارخانجات و کارگاه‎ها ¥ خرده‏فروش‏ ¥ مصرف‎کننده" بدست آمد. همچنین، مهم‏ترین متغیرهای متمایزکننده تولیدکنندگان براساس میزان معامله با دلالان، شامل سابقه دوره‏‏های آموزشی (735/0)، میزان درآمد از دیگر فعالیت‏های اقتصادی (640/0-) و فاصله باغ از بازار فروش (605/0) بود. به نظر می‏رسد در منطقه تحقیق، دلالان و واسطه‏ها، مدیریت غالب بازار زغال‏اخته را در دست دارند و در چانه‏زنی‏های اقتصادی با تولیدکنندگان و خریداران، دست بالا را داشته و تعیین قیمت در بازار را کنترل می‏کنند. لذا برای بهبود بازاریابی زغال‏اخته در منطقه، یافته‏های تحقیق، مسیر روشنی را برای حذف تدریجی جایگاه دلالان معرفی می‏نماید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• بازاریابی
• دلالان
• زغال‌اخته
• گیاهان دارویی

عنوان مقاله [English]

Market Structure Analysis and Marketing Methods of Cornelian Cherry Product with Emphasis on the Role of Brokers in Kaleybar County

نویسندگان [English]

• M. Sookhtanlou
• S. Dehghanpour
• A. Bagheri

Department of Water Engineering and Agricultural Management, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Cornelian Cherry (Cornus mas L.) is one of the most important medicinal and organic products in East Azerbaijan Province which is recognized as the most cultivated area of this crop in Kaleybar county (More than 135 ha of gardens). While due to lack of proper marketing management and lack of complementary industries, it has failed to find its true place in improving the productivity of its producers and economic boom of the region. Influence of brokers in different dimensions of the market and especially the possible future product prices, financial needs and low knowledge of producers in relation to the correct marketing principles and conditions of rapid product corruption are considered in order to maximize profits. What is certain is that brokers, if the right conditions arise, are considered as one of the determining and influential factors in creating a selling price bubble. The influence of brokers on marketing can be explained via 4Ps marketing, which is the most common and at the same time the most widely used type of marketing mix in the field of marketing of agricultural products. Therefore, the aim of the study was to analyze the market structure and marketing methods of this product (4Ps components, marketing routes and marketing methods) with emphasis on the role of brokers in marketing producers in Kaleybar county (in 2018) to create optimal knowledge of the dimensions of brokers' influence in the market.
Materials and Methods: The statistical population included all active producers of Cornelian Cherry in Kaleybar county (N=1010), which sample size was determined by multistage sampling method with the help of Bartlett's et al. (2001) table. First, five major production areas (Cornelian Cherry gardens) were selected from the research areas. Then, in each region, a number of gardens-villages (7 gardens-villages) were determined randomly and among them, 280 producers (n=280) were selected and interviewed by appropriate proportion. In calculating the reliability of the study instrument, Cronbach's alpha method was used, which confirmed the use of study variables (coefficients above 0.7). For content and appearance validity of the study instrument, suggestions and corrections of a panel of faculty members in economics and agricultural management of Mohaghegh Ardabili University, experts of agricultural jihad organization of the province and executive experts of Kaleybar County were considered. To determine the dominant market direction, the producers were asked to state or outline the available paths in Cornelian Cherry market from the producer to the end customer. Then, by examining the frequency of responses, the dominant path was determined.
Results and Discussion: The findings showed that the preferred method of marketing among producers was to sell in farm to brokers. Also, the first priority of the influence of 4Ps components from brokers was related to the price component. According to the findings, dominant direction of market was achieved as "producer→ brokers→ wholesalers→ factories and workshops→ retailers→ consumer". Also, the most important distinguishing variables of producers based on the amount of transactions with brokers were the variables of the history of training courses (0.735), The amount of income from other economic activities (-0.640), and the garden distance from the sales market (0.605). Therefore, while emphasizing on educational programs, with the prosperity of Cornelian Cherry production cooperatives in the region, it is possible to organize the warehousing and transportation management of the produced crop to the market. Also, planning for government supporting purchases and creating a support office for Cornelian Cherry marketing in the region could diminish the role of brokers in the dominant market direction.
Conclusion: The predominant path of Cornelian Cherry marketing in the region often begins with brokers (sometimes up to a few brokers) and reaches at the end to the consumer in a few steps, and brokers are effective in determining the price of the product. The brokers appear to have full control of the Cornelian Cherry market in the studied region and they always have the upper hand in economic bargaining with producers and buyers; and control the pricing in the market. Also, the lack of knowledge of producers of Cornelian Cherry in various fields of marketing, including customer acquisition, advertising, storage, the right sales routes and new marketing methods, are major obstacle to the prosperity of Cornelian Cherry marketing in the region. The special characteristics of production and sale of Cornelian Cherry (such as seasonality, corruption, lack of insurance and government facilities in the region and problems related to proper storage and maintenance facilities and knowledge and lack of industrial and semi-industrial processing and conversion workshops in the region) seem to lead producers to trade with brokers. Meanwhile, the existence of many intermediaries between the producer and the consumer also increase the basic marketing problems of this product. Rising prices, through the number of brokers and intermediaries in the marketing paths, will also have a negative impact on the marketing boom of the region and improve the productivity of Cornelian Cherry production. It is obvious that laying the government financial and executive support for the construction of processing industries and production of Cornelian Cherry in the region can reduce the negative and active presence of brokers in the dominant marketing paths, and increase the profitability of Cornelian Cherry producers in the region. Therefore, in order to improve Cornelian Cherry marketing in the region, the study findings introduce a clear path for the gradual elimination of the position of brokers.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Brokers
• Cornelian Cherry
• Marketing
• Medicinal herbs

مراجع

1. Agricultural Statistics. 2016. Ministry of Agriculture Jihad, Deputy Minister of Economic Planning and Statistics, Technology and Information. Paper 25. )In Persian with English abstract(
2. Altyn I., and Twaruzek M. 2020. Mycotoxin Contamination Concerns of Herbs and Medicinal Plants. Toxins 12(3): 182.
3. Amiri Aghdaei F., and Zare Zardini H. 2014. Investigating the factors affecting the improvement and development of the medicinal plants market in Iran Case study: Isfahan city. Quarterly Journal of Modern Marketing Research 4(1): 214-195. )In Persian with English abstract(
4. Anabestani A., and Toolabi Nejad H. 2018. Investigating the Barriers and Challenges of Marketing Agricultural Products in the Central District of Poldakhtar County Using Fuzzy Network Analysis. Geographical Arrangement of Space 8(30): 59-78. )In Persian with English abstract(
5. Baliga V., Joshi H., and Shenoy S. 2019. Branding of territorial speciality products: A case of Udupi Mattu Gulla Brinjal. Indian Journal of Marketing 491: 8-24.
6. Bartlett J.E., Kotrlik J.W., and Higgins C.C. 2001. Organizational research: determining appropriation sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal 19: 43–50.
7. Brunetti C., Buyuksahin B., and Harris J.H. 2015. Speculators, Prices and Market Volatility. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 51: 1545–1574.
8. Buyuksahin B., and Harris J.H. 2011. Do Speculators Drive Crude Oil Futures Prices? Energy Journal 32: 167–202.
9. Buyuksahin B., and Robe M.A. 2009. Commodity Traders’ Positions and Energy Prices: Evidence from the Recent Boom-Bust Cycle. Working Paper. US CFTC.
10. Cheruiyot D.K., Mwaura P., and Tanui J.K. 2019. The Mediating Influence of Bixa Ollerana Value Chain Government Policy on the Relationship between Product Strategy and sales performance. The International Journal of Business and Management 7(7): 216- 225.
11. Chukwu B.A., Kanu E.C., and Ezeabogu A.N. 2019. The Impact of Advertising on Consumers Buying Behaviour. International Journal of Arts and Commerce 8(1): 1-15.
12. Davari Farid R., Azizi J., Allahyari M.S., Damalas C.A., and Sadeghpour H. 2018. Marketing mix for the promotion of biological control among small-scale paddy farmers. International Journal of Pest Management 1: 1–7.
13. Dehghanpour P. 2018. Investigating the Behavior of Marketing Management Manufacturers of Coal Medicinal Plants in Kleiber County. Master Thesis in Agricultural Management, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran. )In Persian with English abstract(
14. Dixie G., Imam S.A., and Hussain M.J. 2003. Medicinal Plant Marketing in Bangladesh Contents. South Asia Enterprise Development Facility. Public Disclosure Authorized, Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265029002
15. Foladizada M., Barani H., Abedi Sarvestani A., and Mostafaloo H. 2017. Socio-economic Factors Affecting Acceptance of Livestock and Rangelands Insurance Case Study: Agh Ghala County, Golestan Province, Iran. Journal of Rangeland Science 7(1): 35-44.
16. Frey G.E., Alexander S.J., Chamberlain J.L., Blatner K.A., Coffin A.W., and Barlow R.J. 2019. Markets and Market Values of Nontimber Forest Products in the United States: A Review, Synthesis, and Identification of Future Research Needs. Journal of Forestry 117(6): 613–631.
17. Ghambar Ali R., Agahi H., Ali Beigi A., and Zarafshani K. 2015. Identifying the Marketing Challenges of Agricultural Entrepreneurs in Kermanshah County. Rural Research 6(1): 2-0. )In Persian with English abstract(
18. Gilbert C. 2010. How to understand high food prices. Journal of Agricultural Economics 61: 398–425.
19. Hosseini A., Fallahi A., Allahyari M.S., Gholi Nejad S., and Majlisi S. 2017. Identifying economic, educational, and promotional activities that affect the development of the cultivated area of medicinal plants: Comparison of entropy and fuzzy triangular weighting in Delphi method. Agricultural Extension and Education Research 10)4(: 1-12. )In Persian with English abstract(
20. Irwin S.H., and Sanders D.R. 2012. Testing the Masters Hypothesis in commodity futures markets. Energy Economics 34: 256–69.
21. Latorre Guillem M.A. 2020. The Customer Orientation Service of Spanish Brokers in the Insurance Industry: The Advisory Service of the Insurance Distribution Channel Banc assurance. Sustainability 12(7): 2970.
22. Lee J.Y., and Jin C.H. 2019. The Role of Ethical Marketing Issues in Consumer-Brand Relationship. Sustainability 11(23): 6536.
23. Lotfalian Z., Yousefi A., and Amini A. 2014. Evaluation of Grape Product Marketing Network in Two Directions of Fresh Eating and Dried Fruits Case Study of Malayer County. Agricultural Economics and Development 22 (86): 97-75. )In Persian with English abstract(
24. Melindi-Ghidi P., Dedeurwaerdere T., and Fabbri G. 2020. Using environmental knowledge brokers to promote deep green agri-environment measures. Ecological Economics 176: 106722.
25. Melovic B., Cirovic D., Dudic B., Vulic T.B., and Gregus M. 2020. The Analysis of Marketing Factors Influencing Consumers’ Preferences and Acceptance of Organic Food Products; Recommendations for the Optimization of the Offer in a Developing Market. Foods 9(3): 259.
26. Nadaf Fahmideh S., Allahyari M.S., Damalas C.A, Daghighi M.Z., and Ghazi M. 2017. Predicting adoption of double cropping in paddy fields of northern Iran: a comparison of statistical methods. Paddy and Water Environment 15: 907-917.
27. Pezeshki Rad G., and Feli S. 2010. Challenges and Strategies for Processing, Marketing and Exporting Saffron: Application of Delphi Technique. Journal of Agricultural Economics 4(1): 157-137. )In Persian with English abstract(
28. Poyearleng C., Kai Z., Shahriar S., and Reakine O. 2019. Factors Influencing Consumers’ Purchasing Behavior on Organic Vegetables: A Case Study in Vientiane, Lao PDR. Open Journal of Social Sciences 7: 199-215.
29. Rahman M.F. 2003. Agricultural Marketing System in Bangladesh. Agricultural Marketing 45(4): 29-32.
30. Rana K.G., and Astuti W. 2003. Agricultural Marketing System in Indonesia. Agricultural Marketing 45(4): 35-37.
31. Sanders D.R., Irwin S.H., and Merrin R.P. 2010. The adequacy of speculation in agricultural futures markets: Too much of a good thing? Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 32: 77–94.
32. Singleton K.J. 2014. Investor Flows and the 2008 Boom/Bust in Oil Prices. Management Science 60: 300–18.
33. Wu J., Murphy F., Garvey J., and Weifeng M. 2015. The role of market participants in agricultural futures markets. Outlook on AGRICULTURE 44 (2): 97–108.