An Empirical Analysis of Competitiveness of Agricultural Products in Kurdistan Province

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Hiva Rahiminia ¹
• B. Akbari Moghadam ²

¹ Payame Noor University of Marivan, Marivan, Iran

² Islamic Azad University of Ghazvin, Ghazvin, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jead2.v33i4.73577

Abstract

Introduction: The limitations regarding production factors as well as the increasing global markets requirements have increased the importance of products competitiveness. Despite its potentials for export including easy access to Iraq's market as well the availability of important resources of agricultural products, Kurdistan province in Iran has failed to make progress in terms of production and exporting agricultural products. Iran's Kurdistan Province has the important water and labor sources of Agricultural products. Kurdistan share of Iran's Agricultural products export is nearly 1.5 percent. Kurdistan province must recognize its comparative and competitive advantage to increase its competitiveness in international market. Comparative and competitive advantage are used to explain the tendency of countries to export or import commodities. We have used a combination of different indicators to explain the competitiveness of agricultural products in Kurdistan province.
Materials and Methods: The international competitiveness is a challenging phenomenon that has become increasingly important in today's world. Some economic theory emphasizes that change in comparative advantage should be a reflection of changes in the endowment and factors of products. Others attribute the major cause of world trade fluctuations to the technology gap, production factor and domestic costs. Institutional quality and human capital are the factors affecting world trade. Evidences that production and exports become more diversified-not more specialized- as per capita income rises has been interpreted to suggest that comparative advantage does not evolve as theory predicts and has been taken as a basis for a revival of industrial policy in developing countries.
This paper uses the Normalized Revealed Comparative Advantage (NRCA) and Constant Market Shares (CMS) indices to analyze the competitiveness of agricultural products of Kurdistan province for the years 2010-2016. CMS index is combination of three indictors: goods effects, market effects and competitiveness effects. These indexes are calculated for 32 agricultural items with relevance to the agricultural sector. The relevance basis for the classification of 32 agricultural items is the Harmonized Coding and classification system (HS).
Result and Discussion: The results show that Kurdistan province has the comparative advantage between 16 agricultural items comparing to other Iran' provinces. Among those 16 agricultural items, apple, tomato, cucumber, lettuce, other vegetables, pepper, potato, watermelon and eggplant have a high comparative advantage with the NRCA index by more than 0.0005. In the other words, the CMS index indicates the revealed competitive advantage of Kurdistan province in 8 agricultural items. These consist of eggplant, strawberry, animals-meat, garlic, carrot, onion, lettuce and oil and fruit seeds. Kurdistan province cannot convert comparative advantage of important products to competitive advantage. These important products are apple, tomato, cucumber, lettuce, potato and watermelon.
Results of market effect index emphasized that the Iraq market is appropriate for exporting products such as fresh animals, milk and dairy products, potato, piles and shallots, lettuce, carrots and turnips, cucumber, eggplant, currant, watermelon, dried fruits and grains. But Kurdistan province has not export advantage in all products. The results of this study suggested that it is beneficial for the framers in Kurdistan province to produce the products which have relative and comparative advantage and also try to move from comparative to competitive advantage.
Conclusion: This paper offers empirical consistency among five indices of competitiveness advantage to examine Kurdistan province' international advantage in agricultural items in the previous seven years. The results show that Kurdistan province has comparative advantage in many of agricultural products, but it is not successful in creating competitive advantage in target market. Kurdistan province must try to convert its comparative advantage of products to competitive advantage to develop its share of target markets.

Keywords

• Agricultural products
• Comparative advantage
• Competitive advantage
• HS classification
• Kurdistan province

20.1001.1.20084722.1399.34.1.1.4

References

1- Bender S., and Li K.W. 2002. The changing Trade and Revealed Comparative Advantages of Asian and Latin American manufacture exports. Center Discussion Paper, Economic Growth Center, No, 843.

2- Boneli R., and Pinhiro A.C. 2008. New export activities in Brazil: Comparative Advantage, Policy or self-dicovery?. Research Network Working Papers; (R-551), American Research Network.

3- Costinot A. 2009. On the origins of Comparative advantage. Journal of International Economics, 77(2009), MIT and NBER, United States.

4- Dai L. 2013. The Comparative Advantage of Nations: How global supply Chains change our understanding of Comparative Advantage. MOSSAVAR-RAHMANI Center for Business and Government, M-RCBG Associate Working Paper Series/ NO.15, May 2013.

5- Greenaway D., McGown D., and Milner C. 2009. Country Trade Costs, Comparative Advantage and the Pattern of trade: Multi-Country and product panel evidence. Research Paper Series, Globalization, Productivity and Technology, 2009/26.

6- Hanson G.H., and Lind N. 2015. The Dynamics of Comparative Advantage. Working Paper 21753, National Bureau of Economic Research, Combridge, MA 02138.

7- Juswanto W., and Mulyanti P. 2003. Indonesia's Manufactured Exports: A Constant Market Shares Analysis. Keuangan Dan Moneter Journal, Valume 6, Number 2.

8- Khai N.X., Ismail M.M., and Sidique S.F. 2016. Consistency of Comparative Advantage measures: An empirical evidence from the Malaysian and selected Asian shrimp products. International Food Research Journal 23(6): 2752-2758.

9- Mehmet A.S. 2013. Comparative Advantage of Agriculture sector between Turkey and European Union. Africa Journal of Agricultural Research 8(10): 884-895.

10- Phan T.T.P., and Ridel J. 2013. An Empirical Analysis of Comparative Advantage Dynamics. Available At Http://www. Friet.org.

11- Rahiminia H. 2017. Effective Factor to Export Production of Kurdistan Province. (In Persian with English abstract)

12- The Islamic Republic of Iran Customs Administration/statistic: 2010-2016. http://irica.gov.ir/.

13- Thurow L. 1996. Building Wealth: The New Rules for Individuals, Companies, and nations in a Knowledge Based Economy. New York.

14- Trade Promotion Organization of Iran. http://tpo.ir/.

15- Yu R., Cai J., and Leung P. 2009. The Normalized Revealed Comparative Advantage Index. The Annals of Regional Science 43(1): 267-282.