The Influence of Water Users’ Cooperative on Farmers’ Attitudes toward Agricultural Water Management: A Case Study in Khorasan-Razavi Province, Iran

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

A.A. Shahroudi∗

M. Chizari

Gh. R. Pezeshki Rad

College of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modarres University

https://doi.org/10.22067/jead2.v1387i2.1150

Abstract

Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to investigate and analyze the influence of water users’ cooperative (WUC) on farmers’ attitudes toward optimum agricultural water management practices with an approach to compare the two groups of farmers in irrigation networks with WUC and without it. The research method was a descriptive-correlational and causal-comparative study of the survey type. The target population in the study was the entire farmers of irrigation networks in Khorasan-Razavi Province. Using stratified random sampling technique, 335 participants were selected as a statistical. The content and face validity of the questionnaire was specified after several times of review and correction by the faculty members at Tarbiat Modarres University and the executive experts of Agricultural Jihad Organization and Regional Water Joint-stock Company in Khorasan-Razavi Province. The reliability analysis was conducted and Cronbach’s alpha values for the various sections of instrument were estimated to be between 0.73 and 0.86. The results of descriptive findings showed that attitude rate more than half of studied farmers (55.1%) regarding agricultural water management were at positive relatively and positive levels. Moreover, the results from statistical analyses indicated that WUC was very effective on the development of factors related to the social, human, physical, financial, and natural capitals, so that the WUC irrigation network with increases in the components of social confidence, solidarity, and participation, improved extension contacts, developed appropriate information channels, improved the status of regional irrigation system, and increased water users’ participation in irrigation water management were more effective on farmers’ attitudes toward the development and application of agricultural water management strategies such as under-pressure irrigation technology compared to non-WUC irrigation networks.

Keywords

Water users’ cooperative

Farmer

Attitude

Agricultural water management

Agricultural extension

20.1001.1.20084722.1387.22.2.6.7

---

References

1. احسانی، م.، و ه، خالدی. 1382. بهره‌وری آب کشاورزی. کمیته ملی آبیاری و زهکشی ایران، تهران.
2. ازکیا، م.، و غ.ر، غفاری. 1383. توسعه روستایی با تأکید بر جامعه روستایی ایران. نشر نی، تهران.
3. افشار، ب. 1383. عملیاتی نبودن آیین نامه مصرف بهینة آب کشاورزی. گوهران کویر. مجموعه مقالات اولین همایش بررسی مشکلات شبکه های آبیاری، زهکشی و مصرف بهینه آب کشاورزی، تهران، ص 102-101.
4. بهره‌دار، د.، و م.ر، آل‌یاسین. 1381. مدیریت نوین آبیاری و تأثیر آن بر رفتار شبکه های آبیاری. کمیته ملی آبیاری و زهکشی ایران، تهران.
5. پورزند، ا. بهبود مدیریت مصرف آب، اولین گام برای دستیابی به امنیت غذایی. مجموعه مقالات یازدهمین همایش کمیته ملی آبیاری و زهکشی ایران،‌ تهران، ص 468-455.
6. حیدریان، 1. 1382. انتقال مدیریت: روش‌ها، موانع و راهکارها.سومین کارگاه فنی مشارکت آب بران در مدیریت شبکه‌های آبیاری، کرج، 8 بهمن، ص 81-25.
7. حیدریان، ا.، ابن علی، ف.، و م، مسچی. 1381. راهنمای پایش و ارزشیابی انتقال مدیریت آبیاری. کمیته ملی آبیاری و زهکشی ایران، تهران.
8. فرشی، ع. الف.، خیرابی، ج.، سیادت، ح.، میرلطیفی، م.، دربندی، م.، سلامت، ع. ر.، انتصاری، م. ر.، و م.ح، سادات‌میرئی. 1382. مدیریت آب آبیاری در مزرعه. کمیته ملی آبیاری و زهکشی ایران، تهران.
9. کشاورز، ع.، و ک، صادق زاده. 1379. مدیریت مصرف آب در بخش کشاورزی، برآورد تقاضا برای آینده، بحرانهای خشکسالی، وضعیت موجود، چشم اندازهای آینده و راهکارهایی جهت بهینه سازی مصرف آب. مؤسسه تحقیقات فنی و مهندسی کشاورزی، کرج.
10. محمدی نیک‌پور، ع.ر.، و ع.ر، پرستار. 1385. آب محور توسعه تولیدات زراعی در استان خراسان رضوی. خبرنامه جهاد کشاورزی خراسان رضوی، سال 4، شماره 23، ص 7.
11. هاشمی‌نیا، م. 1383. مدیریت آب در کشاورزی. دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد.
12. Burton, M., Marsh, S., and Patterson, J. 2006. Community attitudes towards water management in the Moore Catchment, Western Australia. Agricultural Systems, IN PRESS, [On-line], Available on WWW: URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com.
13. Bustos, R. Marre, M., and Chambouleyron, 2001. Performance of water users’ associations in the Lower Tunuyan area, Argentina. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 15: 235–246.
14. Davis, J.A. 1971. Elementary Survey Analysis. Englewood, Prentice Hall, NJ.
15. FAO, 2001. Guidelines for Participatory Training and Extension in Farmers’ Water Management. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, [On-line], Available on WWW: URL: http://www.fao.org/participation/english_web_new/content_en/Sector_doc/water_management.pdf.
16. Heyd, H., and Neef, A. 2004. Participation of local people in water management: evidence from the Mae SA wathershed, Northern Thailand. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington.
17. Howarth, S.E., and Lal, N.K. 2002. Irrigation and participation: Rehabilitation of the Rajapur project in Nepal. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 16: 111–138.
18. Howarth, S.E., Parajuli, U.N., Baral, J.R., Nott1, G.A., Adhikari, B.R., Gautam, D.R., and Menuka, K.C. 2005. Promoting good governance of water users’ associations in Nepal, Department of Irrigation of His Majesty’s Government of Nepal.
19. Ison, R., and Russell, D. 2000. Agricultural extension and rural development: breaking out of traditions. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, UK.
20. Joseph, C.J. 2001. Beneficiency participation in irrigation water menegemnt: the kerala experience. Discussion Paper No. 36, Kerala Research Programme on Local Level Development.
21. Krejcie, R.V., and Morgan, D.W. 1970. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, (30): 607-610.
22. Li, Y., and Lindner, J.R. 2005. China agricultural university faculty perceptions about barriers to diffusion of web-based distance education. A paper presented at the 21^st Annual Conference of the Association for International Agricultural and Extension Education, San Antonio, TX, 78-89.
23. Lin, Z.C. 2002. Participatory irrigation management by farmers: local incentives for self-financing irrigation and drainage districts in China. The Environment and Social Development Unit, WBOB.
24. Lise, W. 2000. Factors influencing people’s participation in forest management in India. Ecological Economics, 34: 379–392.
25. Mathmaluwe, S.M. 2003. Effects of irrigation management transfer on water productivity and water use efficiency: a case study from Mahaweli system. Water Professionals’ Symposium, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
26. Peter, J.R. 2004. Participatory irrigation management. International Network on Participatory Irrigation Management, Washington DC.
27. Pradhan, P. Water users’ associations towards diversified activities: experiences of Nepal and other countries. Indiana Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis.
28. Ruben, R., and Lerman, Z. 2005. Why Nicaraguan peasants stay in agricultural production cooperatives. Discussion Paper No. 13.04, [On-line], Available on WWW: url: http://departments. agri. huji. ac. il/ economics/ lerman-why.pdf.
29. Samad, M., and Vermillion, D. 1999. Assessment of participatory management of irrigation schemes in Sri Lanka: Partial reforms and benefits. Research Report 34, International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
30. Starkloff, R. 2001. Farmers’ perception of the social mobilization of water user organization in the Sindh, Pakistan. Working Paper 33, International Water Management Institute, Lahore, Pakistan.
31. Vermillion, D.L. 1997. Management devolution and the sustainability of irrigation: results of comprehensive versus partial strategies. Presented at the FAO/World Bank, Technical Consultation on Decentralization and Rural Development, 16-18 December 1997, Rome.
32. Yercan, M. 2003. Management turning-over and participatory management of irrigation schemes: a case study of the Gediz River Basin in Turkey. Agricultural Water Management, 62: 205–214.
33. Zhai, L., and Scheer, D. 2004. Global perspectives and attitudes toward cultural diversity among summer agricultural students at the Ohio State University. Journal of Agricultural Education, 45 (2): 39-51.