با همکاری انجمن اقتصاد کشاورزی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه تبریز

چکیده

رعایت نکردن اصول صحیح مدیریتی، نداشتن برنامه مناسب مالی و عدم کنترل عملیات مالی در تولید مرغ و همچنین نوسانات قیمت نهاده‌ها موجب شده است که واحدهای مرغداری کشور، کارایی مالی لازم را نداشته باشند. این مسائل موجب کاهش کارایی و عملکرد مالی واحدهای تولیدی در صنعت مرغداری شده است. نتیجتا قابلیت رقابت‌پذیری محصولات این واحدها نسبت به رقبا کاهش یافته است. در این راستا بررسی کارایی مالی می‌تواند یک تصویر کلی از وضعیت و عملکرد مالی این واحدها را ارائه نموده و مدیران و برنامه‌ریزان مالی را در اتخاذ تصمیمات مناسب راهنمایی نماید. بر همین اساس در مطالعه حاضر، سعی شد این مهم در مورد واحدهای مرغداری شهرستان تبریز که جایگاه خاصی در تأمین پروتئین کشور و استان آذربایجان‌شرقی دارد، انجام بگیرد. جامعه آماری این تحقیق واحدهای مرغداری گوشتی شهرستان تبریز می‌باشد که به‌صورت سرشماری تحت بررسی قرار گرفت. در این مطالعه برای ارزیابی کارایی مالی از نسبت‌های مالی و رهیافت تحلیل پوششی داده‌ها استفاده شد. نتایج نشان دادند که میانگین کارایی مالی مرغداری‌ها برابر 66/63 درصد می­باشد و یک شکاف حدوداً 36 درصدی تا حصول کارایی مالی حداکثر (100 درصد) وجود دارد. صرفه­جویی و استفاده منطقی از نهاده­ها به خصوص نهاده­های تغذیه­ای و انرژی در کاهش هزینه واحدهای مرغداری و افزایش سود آن‌ها تأثیر مهمی خواهد داشت. همچنین ایجاد ثبات در قیمت نهاده­های اصلی مرغداری­ها می­تواند بستر مناسبی را برای برنامه­ریزی منظم و ارتقاء کارایی مالی این واحدها فراهم سازد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of Financial Efficiency of Poultry Farms in Tabriz County

نویسندگان [English]

  • J. Hosseinzad
  • M. Faraji

University of Tabriz

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Broiler poultry units are among the most important units in the agricultural sector. In most developing countries, there are a lot of investments in these units. By examining the state of industry in the last few years, which has been declining, it seems that there is no efficient and optimal utilization of these units. Due to lack of proper management, appropriate financial programs and financial operations control in chicken production and main inputs price fluctuation, poultry farms do not have the necessary financial efficiency. These issues have reduced the financial efficiency of production units in the poultry industry. Consequently, the competitiveness of products of these units has decreased compared to their own competitors. In this regard, the review of financial efficiency can provide a general picture of the financial situation and performance of these units and can instruct managers and financial planners in making appropriate decisions. Accordingly, present study tries to review the financial efficiency of poultry farms in Tabriz County which has a special place in supplying protein of country and East Azerbaijan province, Iran.
Materials and Methods: In this study, financial ratios and data envelopment analysis (DEA) approaches were used to evaluate financial efficiency. DEA is a nonparametric method in operations research and economics for the estimation of production frontiers. It has been used to empirically measure productive efficiency of decision making units (or DMUs). Although DEA has a strong link to production theory in economics, the tool is also used for benchmarking in operations management, where a set of measures is selected to benchmark the performance of manufacturing and service operations. In the circumstance of benchmarking, the efficient DMUs, as defined by DEA, may not necessarily form a “production frontier”, but rather lead to a “best-practice frontier. Non-parametric approaches have the benefit of not assuming a particular functional form/shape for the frontier, however they do not provide a general link (equation) relating output and input. There are also parametric approaches which are used for the estimation of production frontiers. These require that the shape of the frontier be guessed beforehand by specifying a particular function relating output to input. One can also combine the relative strengths from each of these approaches in a hybrid method where the frontier units are first identified by DEA and then a smooth surface is fitted to these. This allows a best-practice relationship between multiple outputs and multiple inputs to be estimated. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a linear programming methodology to measure the efficiency of multiple decision-making units (DMUs) when the production process presents a structure of multiple inputs and outputs. The statistical population of this research was 45 poultry farms in Tabriz County which were surveyed by census.
Results and Discussion: By studying the economic characteristics of poultry farms in Tabriz it is revealed that the minimum and maximum capacity of studied poultry units is 6000 and 100,000 pieces, respectively; with an average capacity of 30,000 pieces. According to the results, mean production of units is 66 tons at each period and about 56 percent of units are producing below the average production. Results indicate that the average of financial efficiency of poultry farms is 63.66 percent. Also, among 45 studied units, only 5 of them have 100 percent efficiency and rest of them suffer from lack of this important factor. Therefore, there is a gap of about 36 percent to maximize financial efficiency (100 percent). Results reveal that the units which their efficiency are more that 70 percent, have higher production capacity than the other ones.
Conclusion: Economic and logical use of inputs, especially nutrient inputs and energy will have a significant impact on reducing the costs of the poultry farms and increasing their profit. Furthermore, the existence of inflationary situation in economy and the volatility of prices, including the price of inputs for poultry units, have led to a significant increase in production costs in poultry farms; as a result stabilizing the price of the main inputs can prepare a suitable base for regular planning and enhance financial efficiency of units. One of the problems with this type of studies is the lack of financial information of economic units. Given that the results of this type of studies can be applied to better planning of their economic units, therefore establishing and maintaining financial information by economic units will help to better and accurately conduct these kind of studies.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • .Data Envelopment Analysis
  • Financial Performance
  • Financial Ratios
  • Poultry Farms
1- Adeli O. 2012. Measurement of the efficiency of the joint investment fund. Journal of Research Operations and its Applications 35(9): 27-41. (In Persian with English abstract)
2- Amiri M., Backy Hoskuei M., and Biglari Kami M. 2003. Ranking of manufacturing companies in Tehran stock exchange using decision-making models with multiple criteria and artificial neural network. Quarterly Journal of Investment Knowledge 7(2): 73-84. (In Persian with English abstract)
3- Azizi H. 2012. Efficiency measurement in data envelopment analysis using the efficient and inefficient boundaries. Journal of Management Researches in Iran 3: 153-173. (In Persian with English abstract)
4- Bayraktar A., Dursun D., and Zaim S. 2012. Measuring the efficiency of customer satisfaction and loyalty for mobile phone brands with DEA. Expert Systems with Applications 39: 99-106.
5- Daneshian B., Sadeghpour J., Kafi A., and Dehganneghad P. 2007. Data envelopment analysis and statistical analysis. Journal of Applied Mathematics of Lahijan Unit 12(4): 11-20. (In Persian with English abstract)
6- Dashti Gh., Yavari S., Pishbahar E., and Hayati B. 2011. Effective factors on technical efficiency of broiler chickens in Saqez and kolyae. Journal of Animal Science Research 21(3): 83-95. (In Persian)
7- Dastgir M. 2011. Priinciples of financial management. First volume. Publishing Aiej-Man Graphic. (In Persian)
8- Emami Meybodi A. 2001. Principles of measuring efficiency and productivity. Institute for Business Studies and Research, Tehran. (In Persian)
9- Eskandari K. 2011. Performance audit. Accounting Magazine. Auditor 52: 80-89. (In Persian)
10- Eslami Beedgoli GH., and Kashanipour M. 2005. Comparing and evaluating methods of measuring the efficiency of bank branches and providing a suitable model. Journal of Accounting and Auditing Reviews 38(11): 3-28. (In Persian with English abstract)
11- Feizabadi Y., and Yazdani S. 2009. Determining of inputs effect on production risk in the poultry industry. Case study of Sabzevar County. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research 3(1): 63-75. (In Persian with English abstract)
12- Halkos G.E., and Salamouris D.S. 2004. Efficiency Measurement of the Greek Commercial Bank with the use of financial ratios: A data envelopment analysis approach. Management Accounting Research 15: 201-224.
13- Khajavi Sh., Ghayouri Mogaddam A., and Ghaffari M. 2010. Data envelopment analysis technique complementary for traditional financial ratio analysis. Journal of Accounting and Auditing 60(17): 41-56. (In Persian with English abstract)
14- Lilienfeld A., and Asmild M. 2007. Estimation of excess water use in irrigated agriculture: A data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of Agricultural Water Management 94: 73-82.
15- Mahmudi M., Badeae H., and Rezazadeh R. 2013. Study of the relationship between profitability ratios and performanceat the nongovernmental higher education institutions using data envelopment analysis techniques. Journal of Financial Engineering and Bonds Management 16: 1-22. (In Persian with English abstract)
16- Ministry of Jihad E Keshavarzy. 2011. Deputy of animal affairs, Tehran, Available in www.dla.agri-jahad.ir
17- Mossadeqkhah M., Ezadikhah M., Hosseini A., and Mollaie Azadeni M. 2012. Evaluation of the performance of university departments using internal data envelopment analysis. Third national conference on data envelopment analysis. Islamic Azad University of Firoozkooh, 1-11. (In Persian)
18- Nasiri M., and Khanzadeh K. 2015. Relationship between profitability ratios and productivity among the stock companies. Tht Fourth National Accounting, Finantial Managmene and Investment Conference, Azadshahr Islamic Open University.
19- Ondereg M. 2014. The Relalationship between financial performance and total factor productivity evidence from the Czech agricultural sector. International Journals of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies 2(6): 57-67.
20- Paramasivan C., and Subramanian T. 2005. Financial management. New Age International Publisher.
21- Raymond P N. 1985. Fundamentals of managerial finance, Published by Thomson South-Western, Hardcover.
22- Sancho H., Molinos-Senante M., and Sala-Garrido R. 2011. Energy efficiency in Spanish wastewarter treatment plants: A non-radial DEA approach. Science of the Total Environment 409: 2693-2699.
23- Seyyed Mostafavi M. 2012. Callenges of the poultry industry of Iran and solutions to them. Deputy of Economic Researches. Strategic report 148. Code 4-8-91-10. (In Persian)
24- Statistical center of Iran. 2009. Available in www.amar.org.ir
25- Sueyoshi T., and Goto M. 2011. DEA approach for unified efficiency measurement: Assessment of Japanese fossil fuel power generation. Energy Economics 33: 292-303.
26- Wang Y., and Chin K. 2010. A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extention. Expert Systems with Applications 37: 3666-3675.
27- Zhu J. 1999. Super-Efficiency and DEA sensitivity analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 129: 443-455.
CAPTCHA Image