با همکاری انجمن اقتصاد کشاورزی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه تبریز

چکیده

در طی سال‌های گذشته با توسعه و گسترش واحدهای پرورش مرغ گوشتی و افزایش تولید آن، گوشت مرغ به یک کالای ضروری در سبد غذایی خانوارها تبدیل گردیده و به عنوان یکی از مهمترین منابع تأمین پروتئین خانوارها مطرح شده است. در سال‌های اخیر قیمت بازار گوشت مرغ و همچنین تلاطم نرخ ارز در کشور به یکی از مشکلات این صنعت تبدیل شد. یکی از عوامل عمده ایجاد این ریسک در بازار قیمت گوشت مرغ، نوسانات نرخ ارز می‌باشد که با تأثیر بر بازار نهاده‌های وارداتی، بازار این محصول را تحت تأثیر قرار می‌دهد. در این راستا در مطالعه‌ی حاضر به بررسی اثر سرریز ریسک نرخ ارز بر قیمت گوشت مرغ و نهاده‌های عمده‌ی وارداتی آن و همچنین سرریز ریسک بین دو بازار نهاده‌ها و گوشت مرغ کشور طی دوره زمانی 94-1374 با استفاده از رهیافت ارزش در معرض ریسک (VaR) و به طور خاص خانواده‌ی مدل‌های MVGARCH پرداخته ‌شده است. نتایج حاکی از وجود ریسک‌های فراسو و فروسوی برای معامله‌گران تمامی بازارهای مذکور وجود دارد و سرریز ریسک معنی‌دار بین بازار نرخ ارز و بازار نهاده‌های تولیدی و بازار گوشت مرغ وجود داشته و شدت این سرریز برای ریسک فراسوی نرخ ارز بیشتر از ریسک فروسوی آن می‌باشد. همچنین بین بازار نهاده‌های تولیدی و بازار مرغ سرریز ریسک معنی‌داری وجود دارد و در هر دو سطح اطمینان 95 و 99 درصد، در تمامی وقفه‌ها سرریز ریسک فراسوی و فروسوی چشمگیری مشاهده می‌شود. بنابراین با توجه به تأثیرپذیری بالای بازار نهاده‌ها از ریسک نرخ ارز، پیشنهاد می‌گردد تا جای ممکن و به شرطی که اصل مزیت نسبی اجازه دهد به تولید بیشتر نهاده‌های استراتژیک مانند ذرت و سویا پرداخته شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Risk Spillover Effect of Exchange Rate on Chicken Market and its Major Inputs in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • F. Vajdi
  • M. Ghahremanzadeh
  • J. Hosseinzad

University of Tabriz

چکیده [English]

Introduction: over the previous years, with development and expansion of broiler breeding units and its increasing production, chicken meat has become an essential commodity in the household food basket and has been attributed as one of the most important sources of protein supply for households. Recently, the chicken market pricing as well as exchange rate volatility has become one of the issues in that industry. One of the main sources of this risk in the chicken market is the exchange rate volatility, which affects the imported inputs markets.
Materials and Methods: The current analysis is based on 21 years of monthly data on exchange rate, chicken price, corn price, soybean meal price and fish powder price over the period 1995-2016 obtained from the Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of IRAN and Livestock Support Company of Iran. In present study, the risk of overflow between the exchange market and the chicken market and its major import inflows are examined. Estimation has been carried out using GARCH-type models, based on the multi variation GARCH (MV-GARCH), for both the extreme downside and upside Value-at-Risks (VaR) of exchange rate volatility risk and chicken market and its major inputs markets. It depicts market risk by means of the probability distribution of a random variable and evaluates the risk with a single real number. While the VaR method is used to measure extreme market risk, as the risk interaction and spillover effect among different markets is apparent. Furthermore, according to a new concept of Granger causality in risk, a kernel-based test is proposed to detect extreme risk spillover effect between two mentioned markets. The methodology used is Granger causality in risk provided by Hong (2001) and Hong et al. (2003). It requires that the time-varying VaR to be evaluated for each return, and then it should be determined if the historical information about risk in one market increases one's ability to forecast its occurrence in another market in terms of Granger causality concept.
Results and Discussion: According to the results of the Dickey-Fuller unit root test, all variables are stationary at first difference, and based on the results of the seasonal unit root test, seasonal behavior pattern in variables has been found. Then volatility clustering was confirmed by testing heterogeneity of conditional variance. Since the results showed cluster fluctuations in the variables, we evaluated the MGARCH and TGARCH models and then we used VaR to estimate the value series at risk for all variables. The result of VaR section showed that the upside risk of chicken and Fish powder is the highest, and soybean meal and exchange rate having the least risk. In the downside risk chicken and fish powder were known as the most risky markets, corn and exchange rate as least risky. But it is fascinating about the exchange rate that it has a higher upside risk than the downside risk. In other words, there is a greater risk for an increase in the exchange rate market. Finally, the relationship between risks of markets was investigated using risk granger causation. The results indicated that there are over and over additional risks for traders in all of these markets and there is a significant risk spillover between the exchange market and the chicken market and its major inputs markets, the severity of upside spillover is higher than the falling price of the exchange rate. There is a significant risk spillover between the chicken market and its major inputs market at the 95% and 99% confidence levels and in all interruptions, there is a spillover of upside and downside risk.
Conclusions: The exchange rate as a key variable, influences many of the government's policies and economic decisions. Any volatility in the exchange rate will have an adverse impact on both micro and macro levels. Given its impact on the imported input market, it is recommended that a coherent program of foreign exchange market management and stabilization to be developed by the central bank and the government. taking into account the high impression of the input market from volatility and exchange rate risk, it is suggested that, as far as the principle of comparative advantage allows, more strategic inputs such as corn and soybeans to be produced. Considering impressionability of Chicken markets from its inputs market in order to provide consumer welfare and prevent the imposition of additional costs, it is recommended a duplicate effort to be made to implement the policies of market regulation of inputs and reduce volatility in these markets.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Chicken Market
  • imported inputs
  • Exchange Rate
  • VAR
  • MVGARCH
1-Behrad A.M., and Zamanian Gh. 2015. Effect of exchange rate uncertainty on the import demand of Iran Application of ARDL and EGARCH Methods. Quarterly Journal of Applied Economics Studies in Iran, 12(3): 129-148. (In Persian with English abstract)
2-Bonato M., Caporin M., and Ranaldo A. 2011. Hedging risk spillovers in international equity portfolios, working paper.
Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of IRAN. 2014. Economic Time Series Database. Available at http://tsd.cbi.ir/Display/Content.aspx.
3-Dourandish A., and Arzandeh N. 2014. The study of volatility spillover effects of the exchange rate on agricultural industry index listed on the stock exchange. Agricultural Economics & Development, 28(2): 177-184. (In Persian with English abstract)
4-Frances, P. H., and Hobijn, B. 1997. Critical values for unit root tests in seasonal time series, Journal of Applied Statistics. 36: 305-310.
5-Ghahremanzadeh M., and Salami H. 2008. Chicken price prediction model in Iran: Case study of Tehran province .Iranian Journal of Agriculture Science, 39(1):1-17. In Persian.
6-Ghahremanzadeh M., Rasouli Z., Dashti G., and Rezayi R. 2016. Price Volatility and Conditional Correlation of Livestock and Poultry Vertical Market Levels in Iran: Using Constant and Time varying Conditional Correlation Models. Journal of AgriculturalEconomics, 10(3): 19-46. (in Persian with English abstract)
7-Heidari Kamalabadi R., and Shahnoushi N. 2012. Price Transmission from World Markets to Iran's Domestic Markets for Poultry Imported Inputs (Case Study: Soybean Meal and Fish Powder). Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 20(79): 135-154. (in Persian with English abstract)
8-Hong, Y. M. 2001. A Test for Volatility Spillover with Applications to Exchange Rates, Journal of Econometrics, 103.
9-Hong Y. 2003. Detecting Extreme Risk Spillover between Financial Markets, Department of Economics & Department of Statistical Science, Working paper, Cornell University.
10-Hong Y.M. 2009. Granger Causality in Risk and Detection of Risk Transmission between Financial Markets, Working paper, Cornell University. Journal of Econometrics, 150:271_287.
11-Hossein Dolat Abadi S.M., and Taherifard A. 2014. The Positive Shock Effects of Exchange Rate on GDP. Quarterly Journal of Majlis & Rahbord, 81(22):171-186. (in Persian with English abstract)
12-Islamic parliament Research center of The Islamic Republic of Iran. 2009. Exchange rate with export and import .Infrastructure Studies Office, code: 220.1-47.
13-Islamic parliament Research center of The Islamic Republic of Iran.2009 The situation of the livestock and poultry industry. Infrastructure Studies Office, code: 250.1-25.
14-Jimborean Ramona . 2013. The exchange rate pass- through in the New EU Member States. Economic Systems, 37(2), 302- 329.
15-Johnson M., Anderson D., Bryant H., and Herring A. 2011. The Net Effect of Exchange Rates on Agricultural Inputs and Outputs. Poster prepared for presentation at the Agricultural & Applied Economics.
16-Karoro T.D. 2007. An Analysis of Exchange Rate Pass-Through to Prices in South- Africa. Department of Economics and Economic History Rhodes University, Graham’s town: 1-162
17-Limin D., Yanan H. 2015. Extreme risk spillovers between crude oil and stock markets. Energy Economics, 51:455–465.
18-Lin P.C., and Wu C.S. 2012. Exchange Rate Pass-Through in Deflation: The Case of Taiwan. International Review of Economics and Finance, 22(1): 101-111.
19-Livestock Support Company. 2014. Monthly Prices of Corn, Soybean Meal, Powdered Meat. Budget and program management, report years 1814-2014. Available at http://www.iranslal.com/index.php
20-Reboredo J.C., Ugolini A., Rivera-Castro M. 2016. Downside and upside risk spillovers between exchange rates and stock prices. Journal of Banking & Finance, 62:76-96.
21-Sajadi Z., and Fathi S. 2014. Explaining the Four-Step Process of Calculating Value at Risk as a Metric for Risk Measurement and implementing it in an Investment Optimization Model. Journal of Financial Knowledge of Securities Analysis,20(6):1-13.in Persian
22-Shajeri H., Tayebi S.K., and Jalali S.A. 2004. Exchange rate analysis in Iran. Journal of Science and Development, 15(16): 76-16.
23-Shakibayi A., and Teymouri A. 2012. Risk spillover effect of US dollar exchange rate on oil prices. Journal of Economics Research,45(12):99-121. (in Persian with English abstract)
24-Seyyedkolaee A.M . 2016. The Impact of Exchange Rate Pass-Through via Domestic Prices on Inflation in Iran: New Evidence from a Threshold Regression Analysis. International Journal of Business and Development Studies, 8(1): 77-69.
25-Wei Y., Fan Y., Zhang Y.J and Tsai H.T. 2008. Estimating ‘Value at Risk’ of crude oil price and its spillover effect using the GED-GARCH approach. Journal of Energy Economics, 30:1356-1371.
26-Pedram M. 2012. The Effect of Exchange Rate Volatility on the Iran Stock Market Exchange. Journal of Financial knowledge of securities Analysis, 5(15): 83-96.
27-Yang L., Peng W., Hu Sh., Chen W., Zeng Y.F. 2018. Modeling the joint dynamic value at risk of the volatility index, oil price, and exchange rate. Journal of International Review of Economics and Finance, 13-1.
28-Zakoian J.M. (1994). Threshold Heteroskedastic Models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18: 931-55.
CAPTCHA Image