ارزیابی اثرات تغییر اقلیم و سیاست‌های دولت بر عملکرد و سطح زیر کشت محصول ذرت در ایران: رویکرد داده‌های ترکیبی

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• نیلوفر اشک تراب ¹
• قاسم لیانی ¹
• غلامرضا سلطانی ²

¹ دانشگاه شیراز

² دانشگاه آزاد مرودشت

https://doi.org/10.22067/jead2.v0i0.37268

چکیده

سطح زیر کشت و عملکرد محصولات کشاورزی متأثر از عوامل مختلفی است که برخی از آن‌ها قابل کنترل و برخی دیگر غیر قابل کنترل می‌باشد. از جمله موارد غیر قابل کنترل می‌توان تغییرات اقلیم را نام برد. در بین غلات، ذرت هم از نظر تولید و هم از نظر سطح زیر کشت جایگاه ویژه‌ای در جهان دارد. لذا با توجه به اهمیت این محصول و تغییرات اقلیم در طی سال‌های اخیر، در این مطالعه به بررسی اثرات تغییر اقلیم بر عملکرد ذرت دانه‌ای با استفاده از روش داده‌های ترکیبی در استان‌های عمده تولید کننده این محصول در ایران پرداخته شد. داده‌های بکار رفته مربوط به استان‌های فارس، خوزستان، کرمان، کرمانشاه و ایلام برای دوره زمانی 1390-1372 می‌باشد. هم‌چنین اثر سیاست‌هایی همچون خودکفایی گندم و قیمت تضمینی نیز بر سطح زیر کشت ذرت مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که تمامی متغیرهای وارد شده در الگو ازجمله قیمت تضمینی، سطح زیر کشت گندم دیم و آبی، بارندگی، وقفه سطح زیر کشت ذرت، اثر معنی‌داری را بر سطح زیر کشت در استان‌های تولید کننده عمده ذرت دانه‌ای کشور داشته‌اند. در این بین بیش‌ترین ضریب برآوردی مربوط قیمت تضمینی این محصول بوده لذا انتظار می‌رود اثر قابل توجهی بر سطح زیر کشت این محصول داشته باشد. هم‌چنین برآورد مدل ریکاردین حاکی از آن است که بارندگی بر خلاف دما بر عملکرد ذرت اثر معنی‌داری داشته و افزایش بارندگی و به عبارتی افزایش عرضه آب می‌تواند به افزایش سطح زیر کشت ذرت منجر شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• ذرت دانه‌ای
• بارندگی
• دما
• مدل ریکاردویی
• سطح زیر کشت
• داده‌های ترکیبی

20.1001.1.20084722.1394.29.1.3.1

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluating the Effects of Climate Changes and Government Policies on Yield and Cultivation Area of Maize in Iran: Panel Data Method

نویسندگان [English]

• N. Ashktorab ¹
• Gh. Layani ¹
• Gh.R. Soltani ²

¹ Shiraz University

² Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht Branch

چکیده [English]

Introduction: The area under cultivation and yield of crops are affected by various factors, some of which are controllable and some others are uncontrollable. Controllable factors are divided into two types of price and non-price factors. Among the price factors, prices of agricultural products and inputs play an important role in expanding the cultivation area. Uncontrollable factors also have great effects on increasing the cultivation area of agricultural products. Two of the most important factors that affect yield are weather and climate conditions. The agricultural sector that is one of the sectors that is most vulnerable to climate changes has often been used for political debates and research projects. In the agricultural sector, cereal and especially maize, have a special place in the world both in production and in the area under cultivation. Therefore, given the importance of this product, investigating the effects of climate changes on cultivation area and yield of maize needs careful examination.
Material and Method: Panel data in econometrics has many advantages over using cross-sectional data and time series. The Hausman test is used to determine the fixed and random effects in the panel data. Also panel data unit root tests will be necessary. In this study, several price and non-price factors are considered:
(1) Cit = f(Wit, RPit-1, Rit, Tit, Cit-1)
where Cit: maize cultivation area in province i in year t
Wit : wheat irrigated area and dry area in province i in year t
RPit-1: relative imposed price of maize and wheat in t-1.
Rit : rainfall in province i in year t
Tit : temperature in province i in year t
Cit-1: maize cultivation area in province i in year t-1
(2) Cit = α1 Wit + α2 RPit-1+ α3Rit+ α4 Tit+ α5 Cit-1+ uit
In addition, in this study the Ricardian model was used to examine the impact of climate change on maize yield.
(3)
: Yield per hectare of maize in province i in year t
: Temperature in province i in year t
: Rainfall in province i in year t
: Latitude and height above sea level, respectively.
The data used in this study were for the provinces of Fars, Khuzestan, Kerman, Kermanshah and Elam for the period 1993-2011.
Results and Discussion: According to Table 1, all variables are significant at the one percent level of confidence. Therefore, all of the variables are stationary.
Table 1- Results of stationary test for variables
variables Levin-Lin & chow stat. Pesaran& Shin stat. Stationary state
Cultivation area of maize 2.51*** ***1.13 I(0)
Cultivation area of Irrigated wheat 2.45*** 2.89*** I(0)
Cultivation area of Dry wheat 5.02*** 3.76*** I(0)
rainfall 8.74*** 6.09*** I(0)
Temperature 5.78*** 3.40*** I(0)
Relative imposed price of maize to wheat 2.74*** 1.36*** I(0)
Source: Research calculations
Based on the results shown in Table 2, all variables are significant. The highest and the lowest estimated coefficient is for the relative imposed price of maize to wheat (6.68) and cultivation area of dry wheat (0.01).

Table2- Results of the factors affecting the maize cultivation area in selected provinces
Variables coefficient Standard deviation T-statistics
Constant -2.49* 1.23 -2.03
Imposed price ratio with a lag 6.68*** 1.32 5.06
Cultivation area of Irrigated wheat -0.42* 0.22 -1.88
Cultivation area of Dry wheat -0.01* 0.006 -1.98
Cultivation area of maize with a lag 0.66*** 0.06 10.28
Rainfall 0.17*** 0.06 2.86
R-squared 0.97 Durbin-Watson stat 1.84
Adjusted R-squared 0.96 F-statistic 184.5
Source: Research calculations
Table 3 indicates the results of the Ricardian model by using the panel data method. R2 in this model is equal to 86 % and it shows that %86 of the variation of maize yield is explained by variables. According to the results,the rainfall altitude, the rainfall height above sea, the square of rainfall and latitude have significant effects on maize yield.

Table 3- Results of climatic factors on maize yield in selected provinces
Variables coefficient Standard deviation T-statistics
Constant 12.73*** 2.55 4.99
Temperature -0.11 0.20 -0.52
Rainfall 0.002*** 0.0002 7.32
Height above sea level -0.0004*** 0.0001 -3.51
Square of temperature 0.001 0.005 0.17
Square of rainfall -2.62*** 2.45 -10.71
Latitude -0.07*** 0.02 -3.05
R-squared 0.86 Durbin-Watson stat 1.59
Adjusted R-squared 0.81 F-statistic 5.15
Source: Research calculations

Conclusions: In this study, the factors affecting maize cultivation area and yield as a plant that uses a lot of water in Fars, Khuzestan, Kerman, Kermanshah and Elam provinces were investigated. The results showed that non-price factors such as rainfall and temperature have a significant impact on the cultivation area of maize. Due to the emphasis placed on the policy of self-sufficiency in wheat, irrigated and dry cultivation area of wheat and imposed price of wheat, mentioned by Garshasbi et al., have a significant impact on the cultivation area of maize in the selected provinces. The results indicated that according to specific climatic conditions in these provinces, irrigated wheat can be a proper alternative product for maize. Due to Vaseghi and Esmaeili, climate changes could have adverse effects on maize yield and can lead to a reduction of maize cultivation area. Due to the inevitability of global warming, further investigation of this issue is very important.

Keywords: Maize, Rainfall, Temperature, Yield, Cultivation area, Ricardian model, Panel data method

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Maize
• rainfall
• temperature
• yield
• Cultivation area
• Ricardian model
• Panel data method

مراجع

1- Alexandrov V.A. and Hoogenboom G. 2000. The impact of climate variability and change on crop yield inBulgaria. Agriculture and Forest Meteorology, 140: 315-327.

2- Asad Falsafizadeh N. and Sabouhi Sabouni M. 2013. Investigation of Climate Change Phenomenon on Agricultural Production. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 26(4): 272-286. (in Persian with English abstract)

3- Bezaz F. and Sambrok V. 2002. The effects of global climate change on agricultural production, (translation: Nassiri Mahalati M., Kochaki A.R. and Rezvani Moghadam P.) First edition, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad publication.

4- Breitung J. 2000. The Local Power of Some Unit Root Tests for Panel Data. Advances in Econometrics, 15: 161–177.

5- Chang C.C. 2003. The potential impact of climate change on Taiwan s agriculture. Agricultural Economics. 27: 51-64.

6- Cheng H.T. and Capps O.J. 1988. Demand Analysis of Fresh and Frozen Finfish and Shellfish in the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 70: 533-42.

7- Chow G.C. 1960. Tests of Equality between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions. Econometrica. 28: 591–605.

8- Crawford I. 1998. Food and Agricultural Marketing Management. FAO Publishing.

9- Deressa T., Hassan R. and Poonyth D. 2005. Measuring the impact of climate change on south African agriculture: the case of sugarcane growing regions. Agrekon, 44: 524-541.

10- FAO. 2013. Food and Agriculture Organization.

11- Finger R. and Schmid S. 2008. Modeling agricultural production risk and the adaptation to climate change. Agricultural Finance Review, 40: 25-41.

12- Garshasbi A., Yavari K., Najarzadeh R. and Homayounifar M. 2012. Effect of Price and non-price factors on the cultivation area of wheat in Iran’s provinces using panel data. Agricultural Economics. 6: 189-204. (In Persian)

13- Gbetibouo G.A. and Hassan R.M. 2005. Measuring the economic impact climate change on major south African field crops: a ricardian approach. Global and planetary change, 47: 143-152.

14- Gerald S. 1974. Supply elasticities for Sao Paulo coffee, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56: 117-131.

15- Gojarati D. 2004. Basic Econometrics. Translation: Hamid Abrishami. Volume II. Tehran University Publication. Tehran. (In Persian)

16- Hadri K. 2000. Testing for Stationarity in Heterogeneous Panel Data. Econometrics Journal. 3: 148–161.

17- Hausman J. A. 1978. "Specification Tests in Econometrics." Econometrica, 46: 1251–1271.

18- Hayat Gheibi F., Shahnooshi N., Mohammadzadeh R. and Azarinfar Y. 2009. Study of Wheat Supply Reaction Model in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research 2(1): 91-106. (In Persian)

19- Hope C. 2005. Integrated assessment models. In D. Helm (Ed.), climate change policy: 77-98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

20- Huiliu X.L., Fischer G. and Sun L. 2004. Study on the impacts of climate change on china’s agriculture. Climatic change, 65: 125-148.

21- Im K.S., Pesaran M.H. and Shin Y. 2003. Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115: 53–74.

22- IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

23- Iran’s Meteorological Organization. Available at http:// www.weather.ir.

24- Iran Statistical Center, the Census of Agriculture. Available at http:// http://www.amar.org.ir/Default.aspx?tabid=133.

25- Kemfert C. 2009. Climate protection requirements- the economic impact of climate change. Handbook Utility Management.

26- Lashkari A., Alizadeh A. and BanayanAval M. 2011. Investigate the possible Reduction effect of climate parameters change on maize production in the North East of Iran. Journal of Soil and Water (Agricultural Science and Technology), 25(4):926-939. (In Persian)

27- Levin A., Lin C.F. and Chu C. 2002. Unit Root Test in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108: 1–25.

28- Li X., Takahashi T., Suzuki N. and Kaiser H.M. 2011. The impact of climate change on maize yields in the United States and China. Agricultural System, 104: 348-353.

29- Mendelsohn R., Nardhaus W. and shaw D. 1994. The impact of global warming on agriculture. A Ricardian analysis. Am. Eco. Rev. 84:753-771.

30- Ministry of agriculture. 1997. Agriculture statistic. Publications of Statistics and Information Technology office, Ministry of Agriculture, Tehran. (In Persian)

31- Ministry of agriculture. 2012. Agricultural Information Bank, Planning and Budget assistance: General office of Statistics and Information. (In Persian)

32- Moameni S. and Zibae M. 2013. Potential impacts of climate change on Agriculture in Fars Province. Journal of Economics and Agricultural Development, 3:169-179. (In Persian)

33- NasiriMahalati M., Kochaki A.R., Kamaei GH.A. and Marashi H. 2006. Effect of climate change in agro-climatic indices of Iran. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 7:71-82. (In Persian)

34- Nerlove M. 2000. An Essay on the History of Panel Data Econometrics, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2000. Available at: http//:www.arec.umd.edu.

35- Ranjan R. and Tapsuwan S. 2008. Exit timing decisions under land speculation and resource scarcity in agriculture. Selected paper prepared for presentation as a Poster at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL, July 27-29.

36- Reidsma P., Ewert F., Boogaard H. and Diepen K. 2009. Regional crop modeling in Europe: The impact of climatic conditions and farm characteristics on maize yields. Agricultural Systems, 100, 51-60.

37- Ricardo D. 1817. The Principles Economy and Taxation. John Murray Pub., London.

38- Salehnia N. and Falahi, M.A. 2010.Evaluating Eco-Climatic Variables on Wheat Yield Using Panel Data Model. Journal of Water and Soil. 24(2): 375-384. (In Persian with English abstract)

39- Shephard R.W. 1970. Theory of Cost and Production Functions. Princeton University Press. Princeton, N. J.

40- Taghadosian H. and Minapour R. 2003. Climate change, what we need to know. Published by the Center of Environmental research of Environmental Protection Agency, the National Weather Office, Tehran. (In Persian)

41- Tavakoli A.R. and Alizadeh A. 2014. The role and function of altitude and latitude of the productivity of rain-fed barley. Iran’s Dry Cultivation 3: 85-101. (In Persian)

42- Tol R., Downing T., Kuik O. and Smith J. 2004. Distributional aspects of climate change impacts. Global Environmental Change (special edition on the benefits of climate policy part A): 259-272.

43- Vaseghi E. and Esmaeili A.K. 2008. Evaluation the Effect of climate change on agriculture sector in Iran: The Ricardian (Case study: Wheat). Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 45:685-695. (In Persian)

44- Watanabe T. and Kume T. 2009. A general adaptation strategy for climate change impacts on paddy cultivation: special reference to the Japanese context. Paddy Water Environment, 7, 313-320.

45- Zara Nezhad M. and Anvari A. 2005. Application of panel data in Econometrics. Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics, 4: 21-53. (In Persian)

46- Zarghani H., Mofidi A. and Shafienia M. 2012. Climate Changes and its role in sustainable security. Proceedings of the National Conference of Applied geopolitics. Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran. (In Persian)