با همکاری انجمن اقتصاد کشاورزی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی رامین خوزستان

2 دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان

چکیده

خرما به دلیل نقش به‌سزایی که در تولید ناخالص ملی، اشتغال‌زایی و صادرات دارد، یکی از درختان باغی استراتژیک و اقتصادی ایران است. لذا بررسی کارایی تولیدکنندگان خرما و تلاش جهت بهبود کارایی و استفاده‌ی بهینه از منابع، از اهمیت ویژه‌ای برخوردار است. در مطالعه‌ی حاضر، جهت در نظر گرفتن شرایط عدم حتمیت در برآورد کارایی نخلستان‌های شهرستان اهواز، از مدل تحلیل پوششی داده‌های استوار (RDEA) استفاده شده است. برای این منظور 85 نفر از نخل‌کاران این شهرستان با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده انتخاب و داده‌ها مورد نیاز از طریق تکمیل پرسشنامه در سال 1397 گردآوری شدند. میانگین کارایی فنی برای این دسته از کشاورزان 90 درصد برآورد شده و این نتیجه نشان دهنده سطح نسبتاً بالای دانش فنی کشاورزان در استفاده از فناوری‌های نه چندان پیشرفته کنونی با توجه به منابع موجود می‌باشد. مهمترین نهاده‌ای که باعث عدم کارایی در نخلستان‌های ناکارا شده شامل ماشین‌آلات، کود، آفت‌کش و آب آبیاری بوده که با استفاده بهینه از این عوامل تولید به ترتیب 56، 34، 33 و 23 درصد کاهش در مصرف این نهاده‌ها ایجاد خواهد شد. نتایج حاصل از ارزیابی توانایی مدل RDEA در مقابل داده‌های نامطمئن که با استفاده از مدل شبیه‌سازی مونت‌کارلو انجام پذیرفت نشان داد که  این مدل انعطاف‌پذیری قابل توجهی در محافظت از مدل برای این نوع از داده‌ها دارد. بنابراین، استفاده از نتایج قابل اعتماد این مدل برای مدیران تصمیم‌گیر در سازمان‌های متبوع توصیه می‌گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluating Uncertainty of Palm Trees Efficiency in Ahvaz County: Application of Robust Data Envelopment Approach and Monte Carlo Simulation

نویسندگان [English]

  • M. Mardani 1
  • A. Abdeshahi 2

1 Khuzestan Agriculture Sciences and Natural Resources University

2 Khuzestan Agriculture Sciences and Natural Resources University

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Date is one of the strategic and economic horticultural products in Iran due to its important role in gross domestic product, employment and export. Therefore, investigating the efficiency of date producers and trying to improve their efficiency through optimum use of resources have special importance. Several techniques are used to evaluate efficiency of decision making units (DMUs). Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is recognized as a methodology, widely used to evaluate the relative efficiency of a set of DMUs. Although, DEA is a powerful tool for measuring efficiency, there are some restrictions to be considered. One of the important restrictions involves the sensitivity of DEA to uncertainty of the data in analysis. In this research, the linear robust optimization framework of Bertsimas and Sim (2004) was applied in DEA with uncertain data.
Materials and Methods: Data envelopment analysis (DEA) traditionally assumes that input and output data of different DMUs are measured with precision. However, in many real applications, inputs and outputs are often imprecise. This paper applied a robust data envelopment analysis (RDEA) model using imprecise data represented by uncertain set in estimating the efficiency of date producers. The method is based on the robust optimization approach of Bertsimas and Sim (2004) to seek maximization of efficiency under uncertainty (as does the original DEA model). In this approach, it is possible to alter the degree of conservatism to let decision maker know the trade-off between constraint’s protection and its efficiency. The method incorporates the degree of conservatism in maximum probability bound for constraint violation. 85 date producers were selected by simple random sampling and necessary data were collected by completing a questionnaire.
Results and Discussion: In this section, the results of evaluating date producers are presented which consists of eight inputs and one output. For denoting input and output data uncertainty, ten given maximums of constraint’s violation probability were considered with respect to nominal values: 10%, 20%,…100% (i.e. we used Γ = 0.10, 0.20,…1.00). The results revealed that Gamma value decreases as the probability of constraint violation increases. The RDEA model result showed how efficiency declines as the level of conservatism of solution increases or as the constraint violation probability decreases. According to the method, if all Gammas equal 0, then robust and original DEA models are the same. The most difference between mean of optimal and actual amount of inputs is related to four inputs including machinery, fertilizer, pesticide, and irrigation water in both DEA and RDEA models. In this regard, the government and other relevant authorities should provide producers with extension services to help them optimize inputs. The average technical efficiency for this category of producers is estimated at 90%, and this result indicates a relatively high level of technical knowledge of farmers in using current technologies. In simulating violation probabilities ranging from 0.1 to 1.0 (at a constant the level of ε), percentages of average conformity are quite high.
Conclusion: Evaluating the performance of many activities by a traditional DEA approach requires precise input and output data. However, input and output data in real-world are often imprecise or vague. To deal with imprecise data, this study used a robust optimization approach as a way to quantify imprecise data in DEA models. It is shown that the Bertsimas and Sim (2004) approach can be a useful tool in DEA models without introducing additional complexity into the problem (we called robust data envelopment analysis (RDEA)). A case study of Ahvaz county date producer is presented to illustrate reliability and flexibility of the model. The problem was solved for a range of given uncertainty and constraint violation probability levels using the GAMS software. This case suggests that our approach identifies the tradeoff between levels of conservatism and efficiency. As a result, efficiency decreases as the constraint violation probability increases. Additionally the RDEA approach provides both a deterministic guarantee about the efficiency level of the model, as well as a probabilistic guarantee that is valid for all symmetric distributions.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Robust data envelopment analysis
  • Uncertainty
  • Monte Carlo Simulation
  • Date product
1- Abdpour A., Asadabadi E., and Fami H.S. 2017. Analysis Factors Affecting Date Production Efficiency in Bam County: With DEA Approach. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research 48: 507-518.
2- Ahmad Z., and Jun M. 2015. Agricultural Production Structure Adjustment Scheme Evaluation and Selection Based on DEA Model for Punjab (Pakistan). Journal of Northeast Agricultural University (English Edition), 22: 87-91.
3- Banker R.D., Charnes A., and Cooper WW. 1984. Some models for estimation technical and scale efficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30: 1078-1092.
4- Bartlett J.E., Kotrlik J.W., and Higgins C.C. 2001. Organizational Research: Determining Appropriate Sample Size in Survey Research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal 19: 43-50.
5- Bertsimas D., and Sim M. 2004. The price of robustness. Operations Research 52: 35–53.
6- Boubacar O., Hui-qiu Z., Rana M.A., and Ghazanfar S. 2016. Analysis on Technical Efficiency of Rice Farms and Its Influencing Factors in South-western of Niger. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University (English Edition) 23: 67-77.
7- Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Golany B., and Seiford L. 1985. Foundation data envelopment analysis of Pareto–Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. Journal of Econometrics 30: 91–107.
8- Despotis D.K., Maragos E.K., and Smirlis Y.G. 2006. Data envelopment analysis with missing values: An interval DEA approach. European Journal of Operational Research 140:24–36.
9- Dupacova J., Growe-Kuska N., and Romish W. 2003. Scenario reduction in stochastic programming: an approach using probability metrics. Mathematical Programming Series A 95:493–511.
10- Han Y., Geng Z., Zhu Q., and Qu Y. 2015. Energy efficiency analysis method based on fuzzy DEA cross-model for ethylene production systems in chemical industry. Energy 83:685-95.
11- Hoseini Y, Mohebbi A, Pouzeshnezhad M, Basirat M, Rejali F. 2017. Integrated management of soil fertility and nutrition of palm plants, Ministry of Agricultural Jihad, Agricultural Research, Education and Promotion Organization, Soil and Water Research Institute 1: 45-55.
12- Hory M., and Haghayeghi A. 2010. Effects of irrigation interval and depth on fruit quantitative and qualitative characteristics of Barhee date palm Phoenix dactylifera Uarterly Journal of Water and Soil Conservation (Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources) 18: 101-117.
13- Karimifard S., Abdeshahi A., and Moghdasi R. 2010. Investigating the issues of marketing and export of dates in Khuzestan province. Journal of Agricultural Economics Researches 4: 153-169.
14- Khuzestan Agricultural Jihad Organization.2014. Statistical Yearbook. 2014. Management of Horticultural Affairs.
15- Lertworasirikul S., Shu-Cherng F., Joines J.A, and Nuttle H.L.W. 2003. Fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA): A possibility approach. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 139: 379–394.
16- Mardani M., Sargazi A., and Sabouhi M. 2013. Determination of the Efficiency of Sistan Wheat Farms Using Incorporation Optimization Model with Degree of Conservatism Control Parameters and Data Envelopment Analysis (RDEA) Agricultural Economics & Development 27: 180-187.
17- Mardani M., and Ziaee S. 2016. Determining the Efficiency of Irrigated Wheat Farmsin Neyshabur County under Uncertainty Agricultural Economics & Development 30: 136-147.
18- Moheban P., Mousavi S.N., Najafi B. 2015. Efficiency of Agricultural Processing Industry in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research 8: 79-100.
19- Ohadi N., Akbari A., and Shahraki J. 2015. Data envelopment analysis method usage for efficiency determination of pistachio growers in Sirjan. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research 46: 51-60.
20- Pask F., Lake P., Yang A., Tokos H., and Sadhukhan J. 2017. Sustainability indicators for industrial ovens and assessment using Fuzzy set theory and Monte Carlo simulation. Journal of Cleaner Production140: 1217-1225.
21- Sabouhi M., and Mardani M. 2017. Linear robust data envelopment analysis: CCR model with uncertain data. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management 22: 262-280.
22- Shokouhi A.H., Hatami-Marbini A., Tavana M., and Saati S. 2010. A robust optimization approach for imprecise data envelopment analysis. Computers and Industrial Engineering 59:387-397.
23- Toma E., Dobre C., Dona I., and Cofas E. 2015. DEA Applicability in Assessment of Agriculture Efficiency on Areas with Similar Geographically Patterns. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 6: 704-711.
24- Tsionas E.G. 2003. Combining DEA and stochastic frontier models: An empirical Bayes approach. European Journal of Operational Research 147: 499-510.
25- Yu J.R., Tzeng Y.C., Tzeng G.H., Yu T.Y., and Sheu H.J. 2004. A fuzzy multiple objective programming to DEA with imprecise data, International Journal of Uncertainty. Fuzziness & Knowledge-Based Systems 12: 591-600.
CAPTCHA Image