Iranian Agricultural Economics Society (IAES)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

Introduction: The dairy industry is one of the main subsectors of Iran's food and beverage industries, since dairy consumption is essential for people's health and dairy consumption reduces health concerns about the spread of diseases such as osteoporosis and Diabetes intensifies. According to the World Food Organization (FAO) in 2014, per capita milk consumption in Iran is about 66.12 kilograms per year, which is a very low comparing to the global average. The global average per capita consumption of milk is 150 kg and Iran's per capita consumption is about one third of the global average per capita consumption of milk. For two main reasons, it can be argued that dairy buyers prefer brand names to not-so-famous brands. First, they are not familiar with the classification of products of unknown brands. Secondly, the disadvantages of dairy products create many health problems for shoppers. Hence, the brand is a capital for dairy companies because customer experiences from these products can help reduce the uncertainty and perceived risk associated with new products. Therefore, the brand image is decisive for better acceptance of products. The main goal of this study is to examine the effects of simultaneous purchases of various dairy products in Mashhad. The importance of this research is that dairy producers gain a higher profitability from various products by knowing the key factors affecting the simultaneous purchase of their own brand products, while respecting consumers and meeting their basic needs. Another goal of the study is to determine the effect of the total marketing mix on the probability of simultaneous purchases of dairy products from Kaleh, Pegah and Razavi brands (ie, checking the complementary and substitute relationship between brands).
Materials and Methods: The statistical population in this study is dairy consumers in Mashhad, which simultaneously and individually buy dairy products from major brands including Kaleh, Pegah, and Razavi. Simultaneous purchases mean that consumers buy their products at the same time at a single purchase. For example, at a purchase meeting, consumers buy Pegah milk, Kaleh Doogh and Razavi yoghurt. In this research, the interactions and simultaneous purchases of the dairy brands associated with marketing mixes and the brand loyalty effect, the time elapsed since the last purchase meeting, the average purchase price, the number of products purchased in the current session and the number of dairy purchases on the probability of buying each brand per week is reviewed.
In this study, stratified random sampling method is used and the categories considered in this study are divided into five categories according to the levels of stability and development in Mashhad. Finally, the questionnaires were completed randomly by visiting the supermarkets and hypermarkets in Mashhad. For summarizing and analyzing the data extracted from questionnaires and estimating regression models, Stata14 software was used. In this study, the Multivariate Logit and Multivariate Probite Models (MVL and MVP) have been used to achieve the research objectives. For those consumers who buy at the same time (or multiple choices), these types of models are more realistic than multinomial Logit and Probit models (MNL and MNP).
Results and Discussion: The results of the calculations showed that the time elapsed since the last session of the purchase for all brands is significant. The effect of this variable on the probability of purchasing Kaleh, Pegah and Razavi brand products is negative, ie, the more time elapsed since the last shopping session, the chances of buying Kaleh, Pegah, and Razavi brand products will be reduced. The variable number of products purchased in the present session has been positive and significant for the likes of Kaleh, Pegah and Razavi brands, but it is not significant for other brands. In other words, the higher the number of products purchased, the greater the likelihood that the customer will buy the products of Kalhe, Pegah and Razavi. The loyalty variable also has a positive and significant effect on the likelihood of purchasing the products of Kaleh, Pegah, Razavi and other brands. That is, the more buyers are more loyal to a brand, the more likely they are to buy their branded products. The results of Multivariate Logit on the impact of marketing mix on the simultaneous purchase of Kaleh, Pegah, Razavi and other brands showed that taking into account the total marketing mix, there is a bilateral complementary relationship between Kaleh and Razavi brands. Moreover, between Kaleh and Pegah, Pegah and Razavi, other brands and Kaleh, and other brands and Pegah there is a mutually complementary relationships. Indeed, when companies generally use these marketing tools, they can increase the demand for their products. Simple effects for marketing mixes for Kaleh, Razavi, and other brands indicate that with the increasing use of marketing mixes for each brand's products, the likelihood of buying products from the company increases.

Keywords

1- Aaker D. A., and Equity M. B. 1991. Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. New York.
2- Asadollah H., Hamidi Zadeh M., Dari B., and Karimi M. 2011. Developing a Communication Model between Brand-Oriented Brand Value with Brand Performance in the Market; Case Study of Dairy Brands in Tehran Market, Trade and Economic Bulten, 16. P 52.
3- Aurier P., and Mejia V. 2014. Multivariate Logit and Probit models for simultaneous purchases: Presentation, uses, appeal and limitations. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition), 29(2), pp.75-94.
4- Boztuğ Y., and Hildebrandt L. 2006. A market basket analysis conducted with a multivariate logit model. In From Data and Information Analysis to Knowledge Engineering (pp. 558-565). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
5- Cochran W. 1963. Sampling Techniqes. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York.
6- Dadras Moghadam A., Ghorbani M., Karbasi A., and Kohansal M. 2016. Modeling the Impact of Dairy Product Diversification on the Share of Brands in the Mashhad Market, Agricultural Economics Journal, 10(4): 23-38.
7- Dehdashti S. Z, Jafarzadeh Kaneari M., and Bakhshi Zadeh A. 2011. A Survey on Brand Identity Views and Its Impact on Brand Loyalty Development (Case Study: Calais Dairy Products Company).Modern Marketing Research, 2 (2), 87-105.
8- Ebrahimzadeh A., Hossein Sarai M., and Eskandari Thani M. 2011. Analysis and Measurement of Urban Development Levels, Case study: Mashhad City. Quarterly Journal of Geographic Research. (771) 95. 15963-15988.
9- Kartono B., and Rao V.R. 2005. Linking consumer-based brand equity to market performance: An integrated approach to brand equity management. Johnson School Research Paper Series, pp.30-36.
10- Kapferer J.N. 2008. The New Strategic Brand Management: Creating and Sustaining Brand Equity.
11- Khalatbari-Soltani S., and Marques-Vidal P. 2016. Not as bad as you think: a comparison of the nutrient content of best price and brand name food products in Switzerland. Preventive Medicine Reports, 3, pp.222-228.
12- Kwak K. 2007. Price response in multiple item choice: spillover effects of reference price. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Iowa.
13- Hamza-Golnakari E, Ghorbani M., Varidi M., and Shahnoushi N. 2014. Investigating the behavioral patterns of the acceptance of the risk analysis system at critical control points in the food industry of Khorasan Razavi province. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 9 (3): 15-36.
14- Hosseini M.H., and Perazaee M. 2011. Factors Affecting Brand Loyalty in Dairy Products Market. Business Management Perspective, 10 (5), 57-79.
15- Ma Y., Seetharaman PB., and Narasimhan C. 2012. Modeling dependencies in brand choice outcomes across complementary categories. Journal of Retailing, 88(1), pp.47–62.
16- Mehta N., and Ma Y. 2012. A multicategory model of consumers’ purchase incidence, quantity, and brand choice decisions: Methodological issues and implications on promotional decisions. Journal of Marketing Research 49 (August), pp.435–451.
17- Rezvani M., and Mehrnia Q. 2014. Modeling of customer-centric brand value based on mixed promotion elements (case study of dairy companies in Tehran market). Journal of Research in New Marketing Research. 4 (13).
18- Sharif Sheikholeslami J., Yousefi A., and Rahmani Samani A. 2015. Evaluation of Factors Affecting Brand Expansion in the Dairy Market (Case Study: Dairdar Company). International Conference on Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering.
19- Shahyaki Tash M., Gholi Pour E., and Mohammad Zadeh A. 2015. Considering market structure and market power of food and beverge industries in Iran using Leo and Bersnahan approach., Agricultur and Development Journal, 29(2), p:204-215.
20- https://amar.mashhad.ir
21- http://fao.org.
22- Industry Newsletter. www.myindustry.ir
CAPTCHA Image