Water Shortage Risk Assessment Using an Interactive Two-stage Stochastic Programming Model (Case Study: Marand Basin)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• J. Hosseinzad
• M. Raei

Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jead.2021.69061.1017

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years, the problem of water scarcity is becoming one of the most challenging issues with the economic development and population growth that have involved many sectors due to its importance and economic status and has received increasing attention from governments and international research organizations. This emphasizes the need for optimal allocation of mentioned resources to balance socio-economic development and save water. Therefore, the aim of this study is to develop an uncertainty-based framework for agricultural water resources allocation and calculate the amount of water shortage after allocation and also risk evaluation of agricultural water shortage. The developed framework will be applied to a real case study in the Marand basin, northwest of Iran. Perception of the amount and severity of risk on the system can be a good guide in the optimal allocation of resources and reduction of damage.
Materials and Methods: Since various uncertainties exist in the interactions among many system components, optimal allocation of agricultural irrigation water resources in real field conditions is more challenging. Therefore, introduction of uncertainty into traditional optimization methods is an effective way to reflect the complexity and reality of an agricultural water resources allocation system. Among different methods, inexact two-stage stochastic programming (ITSP) has proved to be an effective technique for dealing with uncertain coefficients in water resources management problems. ITSP is incapable of reflecting random uncertainties that coexist in the objective function and constraints. Considering the risk of violating uncertain constraints and the stochastic uncertainty of agricultural irrigation water availability on the right hand side of constraints and uncertainties related to economic data such as the revenue and penalty in the objective function which are expressed as probability distributions, the CCP method and Kataoka’s criterion are introduced into the ITSP model, thus forming the uncertainty-based interactive two-stage stochastic programming (UITSP) model for supporting water resources management. A set of decision alternatives with different combinations of risk levels applied to the objective function and constraints can be generated for planning the water resources allocation system. In the next step, on the basis of results of UITSP agricultural irrigation water shortage risk evaluation can be conducted by using risk assessment indicators (reliability, resiliency, vulnerability, risk degree and consistency) and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method.
Results and Discussion: A series of water allocation results under different flow levels and different combinations of risk levels were obtained and analyzed in detail through optimally allocating limited water resources to different irrigation areas of Marand basin. The results can help decision makers examine potential interactions between risks related to the stochastic objective function and constraints. Furthermore, a number of solutions can be obtained under different water policy scenarios, which are useful for decision makers to formulate an appropriate policy under uncertainty.
The results show that the dry season, i.e., July, August and September are the peak periods of water allocation and demand in Marand basin, which in these months, despite the higher water demand, the amount of water allocation in the current situation is less, which leads to more water shortages in these months. However, the results show that by increasing the efficiency of irrigation and water allocation using the developed framework, the amount of agricultural water allocation and demand is almost balanced and in addition to reducing water shortages, it leads to control over extraction from wells. Also, the goals of the regional water organization, which is reducing the amount of water allocated in the agricultural sector, will be achieved. Comparison with actual conditions shows that the allocation of water resources using the developed framework reduces water shortages while allocation becomes more efficient. Furthermore, the net system benefits per unit water increase which will demonstrate the feasibility and applicability of the developed framework. Results of evaluation of agricultural irrigation water shortage risks indicate that the water shortage risks in the Marand basin are in the category of serious or critical risk level. Therefore, if the current trend of allocation and exploitation of water resources continues, with the population growth, climate change, increasing demand for agricultural products and changing the probability of available water in the future, the water shortage risk would increase to the unbearable risk level. The continuation of this process threatens all investments and economic foundations of this study area. Therefore, the risk of water shortage in the future should be managed by improving the water-saving technologies and also changing the cultivation pattern to drought resistant crops.
Conclusion: In this study, an uncertainty-based framework for agricultural water resources allocation and risk evaluation was developed, including model optimization of agricultural water and risk evaluation of water shortage. The developed framework is capable of fully reflecting multiple uncertainties. The developed framework will be helpful for managers in gaining insights into the tradeoffs between system benefits and related risks, permitting an in-depth analysis of risks of agricultural irrigation water shortage under various scenarios. The assessment of agricultural water shortage risk based on the results of the optimization model helps decision makers to obtain in-depth analysis of agricultural irrigation water shortage risk under various scenarios. In application of the developed framework to Marand basin, series of results of agricultural water resources allocation expressed as intervals, and agricultural water shortage risk evaluation levels under different flow levels and also different combinations of risk levels are generated. Comparison between optimal results and actual conditions of agricultural irrigation water allocation demonstrates the feasibility and applicability of the developed framework. Results of evaluation of agricultural irrigation water shortage risks indicate that the water shortage risks in the Marand basin are in the category of serious or critical risk level. Therefore, effective risk management measures should be taken first for different irrigation areas of Marand basin.

Keywords

• Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
• Interactive two-stage stochastic programming
• Risk evaluation
• Uncertainty
• Water management

20.1001.1.20084722.1400.35.2.5.7

Main Subjects

• Environment and Natural Resources Economics

References

1- Askew A.J. 1974. Chance-constrained dynamic programming and the optimization of water resource systems. Water Resources Research 10(6): 1099–1106.

2- Bohle C., Maturana S., and Vera J. 2010. A robust optimization approach to wine grape harvesting scheduling. European Journal of Operational Research 200(1): 245–252.

3- Chen C., Huang G.H., Li Y.P., and Zhou Y. 2013. A robust risk analysis method of water resources allocation under uncertainty. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 27(3): 713–723.

4- Chung G., Lansey K., and Bayraksan G. 2009. Reliable water supply system design under uncertainty. Environmental Modelling and Software 24(4): 449–462.

5- Dai Z.Y., and Li Y.P. 2013. A multistage irrigation water allocation model for agricultural land-use planning under uncertainty. Agricultural Water Management 129: 69–79.

6- Gu W.Q., Shao D.G., and Jiang Y.F. 2012. Risk evaluation of water shortage in source area of middle route project for South-to North water transfer in China. Water Resources Management 26(12): 3479–3493.

7- Guo P., Huang G.H., He L., and Zhu H. 2009. Interval-parameter two-stage stochastic semi-infinite programming: application to water resources management under uncertainty. Water Resources Management 23(5): 1001–1023.

8- Haiyan W. 2002. Assessment and prediction of overall environmental quality of Zhuzhou City, Hunan Province, China. Journal of Environmental Management 66(3): 329-340.

9- Hashimoto T., Stedinger J.R., and Loucks D.P. 1982. Reliability, resiliency and vulnerability criteria for water resources system performance evaluation. Water Resources Research 18(1): 14–20.

10- He L., Huang G.H., and Lu H.W. 2008. A simulation-based fuzzy chance-constrained programming model for optimal groundwater remediation under uncertainty. Advances in Water Resources 31(12): 1622–1635.

11- Homayounifar M., and Rastgaripour F. 2010. Water allocation of Latian dam between agricultural products under uncertainty. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development 24(2): 259-267. (In Persian with English abstract)

12- Huang G.H. 1996. IPWM: An Interval Parameter Water Quality Management Model. Engineering Optimization 26: 79-103.

13- Huang, G.H., Loucks, D.P., 2000. An inexact two-stage stochastic programming model for water resources management under uncertainty. Civil Engineering Systems 17(2): 95–118.

14- International Water Management Institute. 2000. World water supply and demand. International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

15- Kataoka S. 1963. A stochastic programming model. Econometrica 31(1): 181-196.

16- Li M., and Guo P. 2015. A coupled random-fuzzy two-stage programming model for crop area optimization—a case study of the middle Heihe River basin, China. Agricultural Water Management 155: 53–66.

17- Li Q. Q., Li, Y. P., Huang G. H., and Wang C.X. 2018. Risk aversion-based interval stochastic programming approach for agricultural water management under uncertainty. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 32(3): 715-732.

18- Li W., Wang B., Xie Y.L., Huang G.H., and Liu L. 2015. An inexact mixed risk-aversion two-stage stochastic programming model for water resources management under uncertainty. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 22(4): 2964–2975.

19- Li Y.P., Liu J., and Huang G.H. 2014. A hybrid fuzzy-stochastic programming method for water trading within an agricultural system. Agricultural Systems 123: 71–83.

20- Lu X., Li L.Y., Lei K., Wang L., Zhai Y., and Zhai M. 2010. Water quality assessment of Wei River, China using fuzzy synthetic evaluation. Environmental Earth Sciences 60(8): 1693-1699.

21- Maqsood I., and Huang G.H. 2003. A two-stage interval-stochastic programming model for waste management under uncertainty. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 53(5): 540–552.

22- Maqsood I., Huang G.H., and Yeomans J.S. 2005. An interval-parameter fuzzy two-stage stochastic program for water resources management under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research 167(1): 208-225.

23- Mardani M., Abdeshahi A., and Shirzadi Laskookalayeh S. 2020. Determining the Optimal Cropping Pattern with Emphasis on Proper Use of Sustainable Agricultural Disruptive Inputs: Application of Robust Multi-Objective Linear Fractional Programming. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 30(1): 241-256.

24- Mardani M., Ziaei S., and Nikouei A. 2018. Optimal cropping pattern modifications with the aim of environmental-economic decision making under uncertainty. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development 8(3): 365-375.

25- Nafarzadegan A.R., Vagharfard H., Nikoo M.R., and Nohegar A. 2017. Application of interactive interval linear programming for optimal water and crop area allocation considering virtual water content and socio-economic factors (Case study: Dorudzan-Korbal Plain). Iranian Journal of Ecohydrology 4(2): 601-613. (In Persian with English abstract)

26- Onkal-Engin G., Demir I., and Hiz H. 2004. Assessment of urban air quality in Istanbul using fuzzy synthetic evaluation. Atmospheric Environment 38(23): 3809-3815.

27- Regulwar D.G., and Gurav J.B. 2011. Irrigation planning under uncertainty-a multi objective fuzzy linear programming approach. Water Resources Management 25(5): 1387–1416.

28- Ruan B.Q., Han Y.P., Wang H., and Jiang R.F. 2005. Fuzzy comprehensive assessment of water shortage risk. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 36(8): 906–912.

29- Sabuhi Sabouni M., and Mardani M. 2013. Application of robust optimization approach for agricultural water resource management under uncertainty. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 139(7): 571-581.

30- Sabuhi Sabuni M., Rastegari F., and Kahkha A. 2009. Optimal allocation of Torogh dam water between agricultural and urban sectors by an interval parameter fuzzy two stages stochastic programming under uncertainty. Economics and Agriculture Journal 3(1): 33-55. (In Persian with English abstract)

31- Safavi H.R., and Golmohammadi M.H. 2016. Evaluating the water resource systems performance using fuzzy reliability, resilience and vulnerability. Iran-Water Resources Research 12(1): 68-83. (In Persian with English abstract)

32- Singh A. 2015. Land and water management planning for increasing farm income in irrigated dry areas. Land Use Policy 42: 224–250.

33- Tabriz Regional Water Organization, Department of Equipment and Development of Agricultural Irrigation Networks. (2019). Selected Water Resources Data, Unpublished result. Tabriz, Iran.

34- Wang Y.Y., Huang G.H., Wang S., Li W., and Guan P.B. 2016. A risk-based interactive multi-stage stochastic programming approach for water resources planning under dual uncertainties. Advances in Water Resources 94: 217-230.

35- Yang L., Li A., and Bai H. 2011. Using Fuzzy Theory and Principal Component Analysis for Water Shortage Risk Assessment in Beijing, China. Energy Procedia 11: 2085-2092.

36- Zhang C., Yue Q., and Guo P. 2019. A Nonlinear Inexact Two-Stage Management Model for Agricultural Water Allocation under Uncertainty Based on the Heihe River Water Diversion Plan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(11): 1884.

37- Zhang N., Li Y.P., Huang W.W., and Liu J. 2014. An Inexact two-stage water quality management model for supporting sustainable development in a rural system. Journal of Environmental Informatics 24(1): 52-64.