الگوی ساختاری– تفسیری عوامل مؤثر بر توسعه پایدار تعاونی‌های تولیدی کشاورزی (مطالعه موردی: استان آذربایجان شرقی)

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• فرامرز نوری ¹
• سعیده صمدزاد ²
• جاوید قهرمانی نهر ³

¹ دانشگاه تربیت مدرس

² دانشگاه تبریز

³ دانشگاه خوارزمی

https://doi.org/10.22067/jead2.v33i3.77644

چکیده

تعاونی‌های کشاورزی اهرمی مناسب برای توسعه‌ اقتصادی، اجتماعی و ابزاری برای گردآوری نیروها و منابع توسعه به شمار می‌آیند. در این راستا هدف کلی پژوهش حاضر تدوین مدلی ساختاری– تفسیری جهت تحلیل عوامل موثر بر توسعه پایدار تعاونی­های تولیدی کشاورزی است. بدین منظور جامعه آماری تحقیق مدیران، کارشناسان و خبرگان مربوط به امور تعاونی­های تولیدی کشاورزی و مدیران عامل شرکت­های تعاونی بوده و برای تعیین حجم نمونه از روش نمونه­گیری هدفمند استفاده‌شده است. همچنین پایایی پرسشنامه با استفاده از آلفای کرونباخ (971/0) و روایی آن با اخذ دیدگاه­های کارشناسان و خبرگان تائید گردید. در نهایت جهت تحلیل یافته­های تحقیق و ارائه الگوی توسعه پایدار تعاونی­های تولیدی کشاورزی نیز از رویکرد معادلات تفسیری (ISM) استفاده‌شده است. بر اساس یافته­های حاصل از تحلیل اطلاعات و شناسایی عوامل مؤثر در توسعه تعاونی­ها (عوامل اقتصادی، اجتماعی– فرهنگی، زیست­محیطی، حقوقی، آموزشی، مدیریتی، بازاریابی، زیرساختی– نهادی، شخصیتی– فردی و خوشه‌بندی)، متغیرها در 5 سطح مختلف طبقه­بندی شدند و با توجه به روابط، گراف ISM ترسیم شد. پس از تحلیل MICMAC متغیرها در سه گروه متغیرهای نفوذی، خودمختار و وابسته قرار گرفتند. از آنجایی که با توجه به نتایج، عوامل اقتصادی، زیرساختی – نهادی و زیست­محیطی از اساسی­ترین و زیربنایی­ترین عوامل در توسعه پایدار تعاونی­های تولیدی کشاورزی در استان آذربایجان شرقی می­باشند، لذا پیشنهاد می­شود اقدامات راهبردی لازم برای بهبود وضعیت موجود عوامل انجام گردد. دولت نیز باید با نقش نظارتی و برنامه­ریزی، شرایط و امکانات لازم را در این راستا فراهم نماید. همچنین تعیین روابط بین متغیرها و درجه نفوذ و وابستگی آنها می­تواند به درک بهتر موضوع و اتخاذ تصمیمات مناسب برای مدیران و سیاستگذاران منجر گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• الگوی ساختاری – تفسیری
• توسعه پایدار
• تعاونی‌های تولیدی کشاورزی

20.1001.1.20084722.1398.33.3.5.5

عنوان مقاله [English]

Structural-interpretative Patterns of Factors Affecting the Sustainable Development of Agricultural Production Cooperatives (Case Study: East Azerbaijan Province)

نویسندگان [English]

• F. Nouri ¹
• S. Samadzad ²
• J. Ghahremani nahr ³

¹ Tarbiat Modarres university

² Tabriz university

³ Kharazmi university

چکیده [English]

Introduction: cooperatives play a pivot role in creating sustained society. The objective of cooperative movement in developing countries is not only to renew old economical methods, but also to create fair economic and social conditions. For example, in the agriculture sector of most of these countries, small and even moderate agricultural units do not have acceptable productivity and efficiency and are not able to have production with reasonable prices. Therefore, one of the most effective ways for reaching to a successful agriculture development pattern and finally realizing the large-scale objectives of development is to organize people in groups known as “agricultural production cooperatives (APCs)”. Hereby, economic growth, production increase and fair distribution of incomes can be achieved by practical cooperation of rural population in various civil and social activities. Indeed, these cooperatives pave the way for boosting the production and fair distribution of interests by providing a favorable ground for institutionalizing the cooperation of rural population. All the cooperatives do not act in the same way even if they are located in the same country and are governed by the same laws. Studies showed that successful Iranian cooperatives have longer organizational history and more members, grant greater credits and inputs to their individual members, earn greater income, get more benefits, and incorporate more small scale farmers.
Materials and Methods: in this study, Questionnaire has been used for information collection. The questionnaire is validated after some revisions following consulting with professionals and experts. The reliability of the questionnaire is confirmed by Cronbach's Alpha (α = 0.971) and its validity is confirmed by professional and experts view. Finally, an interpretative equation (ISM) is used to analyze the results of the findings and presenting a sustainable development model for agricultural production cooperatives. ISM is an interactive learning process. In this technique, a set of different directly and indirectly related elements are structured into a comprehensive systematic model. The so formed model portrays the structure of a complex issue or problem in a carefully designed pattern implying graphics as well as words. In other words, interpretive structural modeling (ISM) is a well-established methodology for identifying relationships among specific items, which define a problem or an issue8. For any complex problem under consideration, a number of factors may be related to an issue or problem. However, the direct and indirect relationships between the factors describe the situation far more accurate than the individual factor taken into isolation. Therefore, ISM develops insights into collective understandings of these relationships.
Results and Discussion: Based on the findings and factors affecting development of cooperatives (economic, social-cultural, environmental, legal, educational, managerial, marketing, infrastructure, individual and cluster characteristics), variables are classified in 5 different levels and according to relationships, the ISM chart is drawn. After analyzing the MICMAC, the variables are divided into three groups: intrusive, independent and dependent variables. Since the definition of relationships between variables and types of variables can lead to better understanding of the subject and appropriate decision, it is recommended to managers of agricultural production cooperatives to pay attention to each component in order to create sustainable cooperatives.
Conclusion: Based on the findings from theoretical literature and interviews with managers and experts of cooperatives, components that affect sustainable development of agricultural production cooperatives are identified. Then, by using expert opinion and structural-interpretation equation approach, 10 components as the main objectives for sustainable development of agricultural production cooperatives are selected. The results of the analysis show that economic, social-cultural, environmental, legal, educational, managerial, marketing, institutional-infrastructural, personality-individual and clustering factors are effective on sustainable development of agricultural cooperatives. Also, it is important to specify the exact relationship between variables and their ranking in order to provide a model for sustainable development of agricultural production cooperatives. In this regard, structural-interpretive equations have been used. The results show that economic, socio-cultural, environmental and infrastructure-institutional factors are classified as intrusive variables. Legal factors and clustering cooperatives are classified as independent variables. Finally, marketing, educational, managerial, and individual factors are classified as dependent variables. According to the results, economic, institutional- infrastructural, and environmental factors are among most basic factors in the sustainable development of agricultural production cooperatives in East Azerbaijan province. Therefore, it is suggested that strategic action be taken to improve the status quo.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Structural - Interpretative Model
• Agricultural production cooperatives
• Sustainable development

مراجع

1- Abdel-Rahman A.T. 2017. Factors Affecting Farmers’ Benefits from Agricultural Cooperatives Services: The Case of Kafrelsheikh Governorate, Egypt, International Journal of Economic Research 14(10): 129-144.

2- Agha Safari H., Hosseini S.M., and Karbasi A.S. 2014. Identify and formulate appropriate strategies Development of Agricultural Cooperatives in Iran, Cooperative and Agricultural Quarterly 3(10): 84.25.

3- Balali H., Movahedi R., and Nazari Kamroudi J. 2017. Evaluation of Effective Factors in Improving the Performance of Rural Production Cooperative Companies in Savadkooh County, Quarterly Journal of Rural Studies 8(4): 580-590. (In Persian)

4- Brandao J.B., and Breitenbach R. 2019. What are the main problems in the management of rural cooperatives in Southern Brazil, Land Use Policy 88: 121-129.

5- Biset Amene T. 2017. Assessment of factors affecting performance of agricultural cooperatives in wheat market: The case of Gedeb Hasasa District, Ethiopia, African Journal of Business Management 11(16): 393-414.

6- Bozarjmehri K., and Hadizadeh Bazaz M. 2013. Investigation and analysis of effective structures in the development of rural production cooperatives in Khorasan Razavi province, Experts 8: 85-100. (In Persian)

7- Çelik A., Metin D., and Çelik M. 2012. Taking a photo of Turkish fishery sector: a SWOT analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 58: 1515-1524.

8- Frese M., and Gielnik M.M. 2014. The psychology of entrepreneurship”. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav 1(1): 413-438.

9- Garnevska E., Liu G., and Shadbolt N.M. 2011. Factors for successful development of farmer cooperatives in Northwest China”. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 14(4): 69-84.

10- Haji L., Chizari M., and Choobchian S. 2016. Structural Analysis of Effective Components on the Sustainable Development of Agricultural Production Cooperatives in Rural Areas of Naghadeh, Quarterly Journal of Rural Studies 7(1): 195-216. (In Persian)

11- Hazrati M., Majidi B., and Rahmani B. 2010. Identification of Factors Affecting the Success of Agricultural Cooperatives in the Development of the Rural Economy of the Central District of Khodabandeh, Cooperative 21(3): 90-111. (In Persian)

12- Hadizadeh bazaz, M., Buzarjomehri, K., Shayan, H., Noghanidokhte Bahmani, M. 2015. Performance evaluation of rural production cooperatives on the sustainable agricultural development (Case study: Nishabour county, Journal of Research and Rural Planning 4(2): 111-125. (In Persian)

13- Herbel D., Rocchigiani M., and Ferrier C. 2015. The role of the social and organizational capital in agricultural co-operatives’ development Practical lessons from the CUMA movement. Journal of Co-Operative Organization and Management 3(1): 24–31.

14- Heydari Saraban V. 2015. An analysis on the effective factors on success rural production cooperatives in Iran, the case study – Ardabil province”, International Journal of Community and Cooperative Studies 3(3): 50-55.

15- Hong H.N. 2017. Factors Affecting Sustainable Development of Agricultural Cooperatives in the Mekong River Delta, Vietnam”, American Journal of Applied Sciences 14(10): 1005-1010.

16- Hosseini S.M., Aghasfari H., and Karbasi A. 2014. Identification and Development of Strategies for the Development of Agricultural Cooperatives in Iran, Cooperatives and Agriculture 3(10): 84-65. (In Persian)

17- Ji C., Jia F., and Xu X. 2018. Agricultural co-operative sustainability: Evidence from four Chinese pig production co-operatives, Journal of Cleaner Production 197: 1095-1107.

18- Joneydi M.S. 2012. Factors affecting in sustainability of agricultural production systems in Iran. Scholars Research Library. Annals of Biological Research 3(9): 4578-4583.

19- Kalkan M., and Kaygusuz C. 2012. The Psychology of Entrepreneurship”. Edited by Thierry Burger-Helmchen, 1, 3-27.Retrieved from/ www. intechopen.com.

20- Karami S., and Ali Beygi A. H. 2014. Identification and Prioritization of Factors Influencing the Development of Rural Cooperative Cooperatives, Cooperatives and Agriculture 10: 112-143. (In Persian)

21- Karim M.H. 2015. Challenges of Rural Cooperative Networks of Iran, Quarterly Journal of Rural Space and Rural Development 4(3): 173-196. (In Persian)

22- Koksal K., Yakup Erdal E., and Okan D. 2016. Farmers’ Attitudes towards Agricultural Cooperatives: the Case of IGDIR Province of Turkey, Can J. App Sci., 6(3): 1-7.

23- Liebrand C.B., and Charles Ling K. 2014. Member Satisfaction with their cooperatives: Insights from dairy farmers. USDA rural development. Rural Business-Cooperative Service. RBS Research Report 229.

24- Mahmoodzadeh J., and Sabouri M.S. 2014. Factors affecing farmers’tendency to estabilish production cooperetives by factor analysis in Mahabad (west Azarbaijan province, Iran). International Journal of Plant, Animmal and Environmental Science 4(2): 245-250.

25- Mahazril A., Hafzah H.A.K., and Zuraini Y. 2012. Factors affecting cooperatives’ performance in relation to strategic planning and members’ participation, Social and Behavioral Sciences 65: 100–105.

26- Mohammadzade Chali M., Sharifzadeh M.M., Abdollahzadeh G.H., and Kuseh-Gharavi Y. 2015. Assessment the performance of the pasture cooperatives unions in Golestan Province, Persian, and paper presented at The International Conference on Sustainable Development with a focus on Agriculture, Environment and Tourism, Tabriz, Iran. (In Persian)

27- Montes N.D., and Madamba J.A.B. 2013. A review of alliances and cooperative business models in contemporary cooperativism: Strategic implications for sustaining Philippine cooperative enterprises. Comme morative book. Cooperative Enterprise Development 44-51.

28- Nekoo Naeini S.A., Ali Beyghi A.H., and Zarafshani K. 2009. Examining the Effective Factors on the Success of Rural Cooperatives in Kermanshah, Journal of Village and Development 12(4): 1-22. (In Persian)

29- Nkhoma A.T. 2011. Factors affecting sustainability of agricultural cooperatives: lessons from Malawi. A thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of AgriCommerce at Massey University. New Zealand, March, 2011. (Doctoral dissertation)

30- Pirouz E., and Gholipour S. 2018. Factors Affecting the Development of Agricultural Cooperatives in Shabestar, Cooperatives and Agriculture 7(26): 104-127. (In Persian)

31- Sariannidis N., Galani D., and Xanthos G. 2011. A new cooperative model of micro and small enterprises (MSEs) for sustainable development. Archives of Economic History 1(1): 57-70.

32- Savari M., Dorani M., and Shaban Ali Fami H. 2015. Examining the Role of Agricultural Production Cooperatives in Achieving Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Cooperatives and Agriculture 4(13): 120-138. (In Persian)

33- Shirdel A., Ghaffari A., and Bagheri A. 2014. Perceptions of agricultural production members regarding cooperatives performance in Ardabil town ship, Cooperation and Agriculture 3(11): 119-142. (In Persian)

34- Singhal D., Tripathy S., Kumar Jena S., Nayak K.K., and Dash A. 2018. Interpretive structural modelling (ISM) of obstacles hindering the remanufacturing practices in India”, 2nd International Conference on Materials Manufacturing and Design Engineering, Procedia Manufacturing 20: 452-457.

35- Taleb M., and Bakhshi Zadeh H. 2012. Rural Cooperatives and Rural Governance in Iran, Rural Development (Social Sciences Letter) 2: 25-46. (In Persian)

36- Tadesse Abate G. 2018. Drivers of agricultural cooperative formation and farmers’ membership and patronage decisions in Ethiopia, Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management 6(2): 53-63.

37- Waring G.E. 2010. The Element of Agriculture, New York: Publisher Cornell University.

38- Yuliando H., Erma K.N., Cahyo S.A., and Supartono W. 2015. The strengthening factors of tea farmer cooperative: Case of Indonesian tea industry. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 3: 143–148.

39- Zaccai E. 2012. Over two decades in pursuit of sustainable development: influence. Transformations, limits. Journal of Environmental Development 1: 124-136.

40- Zare Abadi A., Hajizadeh Miyandi M., and Mire Khalaj H. 2015. Socio-cultural factors related to the success of manufacturing cooperatives in Yazd, Journal of Social Development (Human Development) 10(1): 127-156. (In Persian)

41- Zarifan S., and Bahadori Ghezeljeh M. 2014. Performance analysis of autonomous rural production cooperatives in Hamadan province according to SWOT model, Iranian Journal of Agri cultural Economics and Development 45(1): 163-174. (In Persian)

42- Zheng S., Wang Z., and Song S. 2011. Farmers’ behaviors and performance in cooperatives in Jilin Province of China: A case study”. The Social Science Journal 48(3): 449–457.