Evaluation of Rural Poverty Indicators and Its' Affecting Factors in Iran

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• E. Pishbahar ¹
• Sh. Bagherpour ¹
• M. Ghahremanzadeh ²

¹ Tabriz

² Tabriz university

https://doi.org/10.22067/jead2.v0i0.73388

Abstract

Introduction: Poverty is prevalent in majority of the world's nations. If a country is not on the path of eliminating or reducing poverty, it will not be on the path of growth and development. Undoubtedly, the first step in planning of anti-poverty and reducing inequality for development of society is a good recognizing of poor people and poverty situations. To do so, it is necessary to define and use poverty indicators for measuring poverty, which can reveal the different aspects of poverty. Indeed, more precisely identifying the number and grade of households below the poverty line in different locations can help policymakers toward better planning. According to the statistics provided by the Statistical Centre of Iran, in recent years, due to the low level of income of villagers, it has been emphasized more on poverty issue in the rural sector than the urban sector, and the size and severity of poverty in rural areas have been more tangible. Income inequalities (using the Gini coefficient) have always been higher in rural areas than in urban areas. So in this regard, the main purpose of this study is to "survey the rural poverty indices and its affecting factors in rural areas of Iran".
Materials and Methods: One of the most important concerns of governments is awareness of poverty and inequality in society to take action to improve the status of poverty and distribution of income. In this regard, it is important to determine the poverty line and poverty measurement indicators. In this study, poverty indicators were categorized into two categories of "Classical indicators", including "Head Quant Ratio", "Poverty Gap index", "Income Gap Ratio", "Kakwani Index", "Kakwani - Sen index", "Sen Index" and "Modern indicators", including "Gini coefficient index", "Atkinson index", "Araar Index", "DER Index", "Foster - Wolfon index", and "Steban Grading Ray Index". It should be noted that the classification of indices is done to simplify the subject, although the basis of this classification is the observance of the two "monotonicity axiom" and "transfer axiom" by the indexes, that is, the use or absence of polarization in the distribution of income (and inequality). The polarization distribution of a variable is the degree of distribution be distributed around a polar group. Many papers and studies have examined the difference between indices of inequality and polarized indicators and concluded that, in general, phenomena such as "middle class disappeared" or "boundary grouping" cannot be estimated by indices of inequality such as "Gini coefficient index". These topics require more robust and complete indicators that can also analyze the polarity of the data.
Results and Discussion: the aim of this research is examining the situation of poverty and distribution of income “inequality”. Indicators of poverty measurement include modern and classical indicators then  the impact of some macroeconomics variables on poverty  has been investigated using data of income plan for households in rural areas in years 1987-2016, with Stata software and DASP package calculating classical indicators which includes: "Head Quant Ratio", "Poverty Gap", "Income Gap Ratio", "Kakwan index", "Severity Poverty of Sen", "Sen Poverty index" and modern indicators which includes: "Gini index", "Atkinson index", "Arrar index", "DER index", "Foster - Wolfson index, "Steban Gradin Ray index. In order to investigate the factors affecting poverty, firstly, between two linear and logarithmic functional forms, logarithmic forms are used as the appropriate form for running regression. In addition, White's powerful variance has been used to solve the heterogeneity variance problem. The results of regression estimation for factors affecting poverty indicators show that economic growth, fertility rate, unemployment, household size, time trend, rural population, agricultural producer price index, net capital agriculture and agricultural value added affect all six modern indicators of poverty.
Conclusion: The result of indicators using income plan data for households in rural areas  for years 1987-2016, with Stata 14.0 software  and DASP 3.0 package shows that poverty increased in years 1987-1992 and 2012-2016 but decreased in 1993 till 2011. Reducing unemployment, controlling inflation and controlling the growth rate of rural populations are important factors affecting poverty. Increasing agricultural producers' prices will improve rural incomes and improve poverty, as well as increase in agricultural investment and increase in agricultural value added, which can have a major impact on rural welfare and poverty. It is also recommended that supportive policies based on spatial and regional differences should be developed and applied based on the difference in income deciles.
 

Keywords

• : Poverty
• Poverty Index
• rural areas
• Household
• Justice

20.1001.1.20084722.1398.33.1.4.0

References

1- Abdelkrim A. 2009. The Hybrid Multidimensional Index of Inequality Cahiers de recherche 0945.

2- Atkinson A. 1987. On the measurement of poverty, Econometrica, 55, pp. 749-60.

3- Araar D. 1970. Poverty & equality measurement, policy & estimation with DAD.

4- Atkinson A. 1970. On the Measurement of Inequality. Journal of economic Theory 2(3): 244-63.

5- Arabmazar A., and Hosseininezhad M. 2004. Estimation of poverty and its severity in various occupational groups of rural households. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development 12(45): 113-141.

6- Central Bank of Iran. 2016. Data of Economic time series for years 1997-2011, are available on the site: http://www.tsd.cbi.ir. (Received at 26 October 2017).

7- Duclos J., Esteban J., and Ray D. 2004. Polarization, Concepts, Measurement, and Estimation. Econometrica 72(17): 37-1772.

8- Esteban J., and Ray D. 1991. On the Measurement of Polarization, Boston University, Institute for Economic Development, Working Paper 18. Esteban, J., C. Gradin and D. Ray 1998, Extensions of a Measure of Polarization, with an Application to the Income Distribution of Five OECD countries, Institute of Analisis Economic.

9- Foster J., and Wolfson M. 1992. Polarization and Decline of the Middle class Canada and the U.S mimeo, Vanderbilt University.

10- Hasanzadeh A. 2001. Factors Affecting poverty. Master thesis of economics. Islamic Azad University of science and research Tehran. (In Persian)

11- Hosseini Sh. 2007. Study of distribution measurement indicators, vice-chancellor of the expediency council, Tehran.

12- Iranian center for statistics, statistical yearbooks for years 1986-2015 and the population and housing census of 1956-2011 are available on the site: http:// www.amarmag.org .(received at 26 October 2017).

13- Kakwani N., and San H. 2006. Pro-Poor Growth and Social Programmers' in Brazil, December 2006.

14- Khodadad Kashi F., and Colleagues. 2002. Measuring poverty indicators, Economin research group.

15- Khodadad Kasha F., and Colleagues. 2003. The study of the poverty trend of income distribution and the determination of the required classes of the guardians in terms of social and economic characteristics. Institute for Economics studies and research.

16- Mohammad A.M., Vedadayer A.A., Seifi A., and Mushtagh R. 2012. Meta-analysis of Poverty Studies in Iran. Journal of Social Welfare 12(45): 7-48.

17- Omrani and Colleague. 2009. Determinants of poverty and Welfare changes in rural households in sistan province. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research 1(2): 21-42.

18- Parvin S. 2010. Impact of price on poverty. Quarterly Journal of Economics 7(2): 95-117.

19- Rashidi P., and Naji A. 2013. The survey of poverty indicators in urban areas of khorasan razavi, during 2006-2012. Journal of Economics and Modeling, Shahid Beheshti University.

20- Shoushtarian A. 2007. Investigating institutional determinants of rural poverty with emphasis on women's cooperatives in Fars province, sixth conference on agricultural economics.

21- Sen A. 1976. Poverty: An ordinal approach to measurement Econometrica 44: 219-231.

22- Sen A. 2006. Conceptualizing and Measuring Poverty In: Grusky D. Kanbur R Poverty & Inequality Stanford University Press.

23- Souri D. 2001. Poverty and inequality and economics growth in Iran, research institute for development planning: 65-320.

24- Salmani mogaddam and Colleague. 2017. Investigating the factors affecting poverty in urban areas of Iran, fourth international conference on environmental planning and management, faculty of environment university of Tehran.

25- Torabi T. 1999. Measuring poverty indicators and inequality of income distribution in Iran during 1986-1996. Statistical center of Iran, Tehran.

26- Zahedi M. 2005. Rural Poverty, its Trend and Measurement in Iran (Explaining Methods and Critique of Approaches). Journal of Social Welfare 17: 289-326.