Analysis of the Farmers Economic Behavior to Reduce the Environmental Effects of Agricultural Chemical Inputs (a Case Study of Kashaf- Rood Basin in Mashhad)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• H. Aghasafari ¹
• M. Ghorbani ²
• A. Dourandish ²

¹ Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

² Agricultural Economics Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

https://doi.org/10.22067/jead2.v0i0.32467

Abstract

The purpose of this study is the analysis of the farmers economic behavior to reduce the adverse environmental effects of agricultural chemical inputs by using contingent valuation approach and Tobit model by Heckman's two stage. To achieve the desired goal, 100 questionnaires collected by a random sampling from farmers of Kashaf- rood basin in Mashhad city in 2013. Results showed that variables of age, education, type of agricultural activity, index 2 (farmers agree with the adverse effects of overuse of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, index 5 (farmers agree with investments to protect the soil and water), Sex, number of households employed in agriculture, experience in the use of soil and water conservation practices, total area under cultivation and index 4 (farmers agree with well being of available soil and water) have a significant impact on the farmers financial participation to reduce the adverse environmental effects of chemical fertilizers. also, variables of age, education, total amount annual consumption of chemical pesticides per year, sex, main job, number of households employed in agriculture, type of agricultural activity, net savings of agriculture, land ownership status, total amount annual consumption of fertilizer per year, index 1 (farmers agree with benefits of preventing soil washing), index 4 (farmers agree with well being of available soil and water) and index 5 (farmers agree with investments to protect the soil and water) have a significant impact on the farmers financial participation to reduce the adverse environmental effects of chemical pesticides. According to the study results, Suggestions is presented for reducing the adverse environmental impacts of chemical inputs.

Keywords

• Chemical Inputs
• Contingent Valuation
• Kashaf- rood Basin
• Tobit model

20.1001.1.20084722.1394.29.1.1.9

References

1- Anabestani A.A. 2008. Comprehensive plan to reduce water pollution Sabzevar city. Department of Environmental Protection of Razavi Khorasan, Iran. (in Persian)

2- Asrat P., Belay K., and Hamito D. 2004. Determinants of farmers’ wilingness to pay for soil conservation practices in the southeastern highlands of Ethiopia. Journal of Land Degradation and Development, 15: 423-438.

3- Boyle K.J., Johnson F.R., McCollum D.W., Desvousges W.H., Dunford R., and Hudson S. 1996. Valuing public goods: Discrete versus continuous contingent-valuation responses. Journal of Land Economics, 72:381-396.

4- Brookshire D.S., Eubanks D.S., and Randall A. 1983. Estimating option price and existence values for wildlife resources. Journal of Land Economics, 59:1-15.

5- Choe K.A., Whittington D., and Lauria D.T. 1996. The economic benefits of surface water quality improvements in developing countries: A case study of Davao, Philippines. Journal of Land Economics, 72:107-126.

6- Desvousges W.H., Johnson F.R., Dunford R.W., Boyle K.J., Hudson S.P., and Wilson N. 1993. Measuring natural resource damages with contingent valuation: Tests of validity and reliability. P. 91-164. In J.A. Hausman. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. Amsterdam, North Holland.

7- Garming H. and Waibel H. 2008. Willingness to pay to avoid health risks from pesticides: A case study from Nicarague. In 46th Annual Meeting of the German Association of Agricultural Economists, 4-6 Oct. 2008. Giessen, Germany.

8- Ghorbani M., Nemati A., Ghorbani R., and Liaghati H. 2010. Economic behavior of wheat farmers to reduce externalities of herbicides on environment in Khorasan Razavi province: Application of Contingent Valuation. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 41(3): 257-266. (in Persian)

9- Greene W.H .1993. Econometric Analysis. Macmillan, New York.

10- Hanemann M.W., and Kanninen B. 2001. The statistical analysis of discrete-response CV data. p. 302-441. In I.J. Bateman, and K.G. Willis. Valuing Environmental Preferences. Part 2. Oxford University, USA.

11- Heckman J. 1976. The common structure of statistical of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement. 5: 475-492.

12- Hossein zad J., Shorafa S., Dashti G., Hayati B., and Kazemiyeh F. 2010. An economic evaluation of the environmental benefits from pesticides reduction program in Khuzestan province. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Production Science, 20(4): 101-112. (in Persian with English abstract)

13- Kochaki A., Dehghanian S., and Kolahi Ahari A. 2008. An Introduction to Agricultural Geography. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad. (in Persian)

14- Lashkaripour Gh., Ghafouri M., Mousavi Maddah S.M., Babaei M., and Afshar S. 2009. Assessment of the source and factors affecting pollution surface and subsurface water resources in Kashaf-rood River (plain Mashhad). 12 p. In 1st National Conference on Hydrogeology, 28 Nov. 2009. Islamic Azad University Behbahan Branch, Khuzestan, Iran. (in Persian)

15- Lohr L., Park T., and Higley L. 1999. Farmer risk assessment for voluntary insecticide reduction. Journal of Ecological Economics, 30: 121-130.

16- Mcdonald J.F., and Moffitt R. A. 1982. The Uses of Tobit Aanalysis. Journal of the Review of Economics and Statistics, 62:318-321.

17- Mitchell R.C., and Carson R.T. 1989. Using surveys to value public goods: The Contingent Valuation method. Resource for the Future, Washington.

18- Niklitschek M., and Leon J. 1996. Combining intended demand and yes/no responses in the estimation of Contingent Valuation models. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31:387-402.

19- Pearce D., and Turner R.K. 1990. Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

20- Portney P.R. 1994. The Contingent Valuation debate: Why economists should care. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8: 3-17.

21- Rahmani H.R. 2010. Sustainable Agriculture and Challenges of Producing Healthy. Nasouh, Isfahan. (in Persian)

22- Siadat S.A., and Moradi Talavat M.R. 2011. Practical Aspects of Organic Farming. Agricultural Extension Education, Tehran. (in Persian)

23- Weldesilassie A.B., Frör O., Boelee E., and Dabbert S. 2009. The economic value of improved wastewater Iirrigation: A Contingent Valuation study in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 3: 428–449.